justhat
<font color=teal>DC DISer<br><font color=red>pick
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 7,449
You are of course right that family is about compromise, and we will also be making do with what is offered while we are crusing, but if what is offered isn't working for us shouldn't we let Disney know that it is a bad idea to schedule a 4 hour open house right after dinner because the club was overcrowded and our kids were not haivng fun??? How can they fix it if they don't know guests are not happy with the situation??
Oh I agree, if that is the case, totally complain. I would too. I'm just saying, before we all start ranting and raving, maybe try it out first and see how it goes. Maybe it will all be fine and the complaints would be baseless. We just don't know yet, each of us, till we try it.
The thing about scheduling open houses while it is a potentially crowded time of day, maybe on that cruise it wasn't expected to be so bad? The after dinner thing is rough cause some have early dining, some late dining, so people leave their kids in the clubs for dinner, etc. So maybe they based it on many people having early dinner and not being in the clubs at those times? Or more people with kids in late dinner? I just doubt they would purposely plan open houses for a time they know would make one club or the other packed.
Oh, and as to why they would build the clubs larger than they need to, I would assume they sort of have to do this in case of emergencies like I mentioned. Like the toilets backing up in the Club. Then what? They'd need a place for those kids to go. Or some other fluke event. I mean, it's a ship, not like they'd have anywhere to go, they'd need to have extra secured space.
I'll respond to this one since you quoted me, LOL. I view things a little differently, in that I don't want my son to spend 2 hours of his vacation miserable in the place that is designed for him to have a good time. We chose DCL, largely in part, based on the superior children's programming.
My son would love to do the discover scuba excursion with my DH and DD (he already practices in our pool and is comfortable with the equipment). But he is too young for that excursion and will instead remain on the ship with me while DH and DD go. He would love to join his sister in the Tween club to check out the video games, etc (he and his older sister, surprisingly, get along really well most of the timeand like to do things together). But again, he is too young to be in that space and knows he can't go.
But what does he have that he can do...the Lab. And with this new policy, his space, the one designed for him...is going to be more restricted (either requiring a parent or filled with twice as many kids)for large chunks of time. His sister doesn't have to worry about Open Houses in the Tween club. She can go whenever she wants. I can go to the Adult pool whenever I want. But now we have to check navigators the night before to see if he can go and enjoy the space that was designed (and marketed) for him.
That is what I am not happy about. I have no problem with a set schedule for Open Houses like on the Magic (3 - 6 pm every day). We can plan on it. I can make sure that we are available to join him if there is something he wants to do during the Open House. We can book Palo, spa appointments, etc around those times. But the way it is currently being done on the Wonder is a huge disappointment to parents and kids that want to use the Lab as it was intended.
Would your child truly be miserable for just 2 hours? I mean, other kids his age would be in whichever club, not like he'd be the only 10yo (or whatever the age may be) in there. Each kid will have peers and I am sure DCL has activities planned to accommodate the ages. My own kids have preferences on clubs, so while they might be disappointed that one club is closed the night I am in Palo, they'd still have fun in there for the 2 hours I'd be gone and when I came to check on them after dinner, they'd likely want to stay, even though it wasn't the club of their choice. My older one (will be 8yo on our cruise in March) prefers the club, and my 5yo prefers the lab. But they'd still find friends their age in either side (if one side was closed) and have a good time in my absence.
It's nearly impossible to respond to you point by point as you have done because the original quotes don't show up when I quote you, but one clarification that I would like to make is this - it is completely incorrect and untrue that children ages 3-10 have ALWAYS been allowed to move freely between the Club and the Lab. The Club was originally built and used a space for children aged 3-6, and the Lab was for 7-10. This is information that is readily available and that has already been confirmed. The system was changed in 2009 (and YES, there were probably "exceptions" made prior to that because we all have seen how prevalent those are on DCL) to accommodate requests from families with multiple children of varying ages to stay together. This is not my opinion. It is a fact. Hence, neither space was built for both age groups. To say that is like saying that Edge and Vibe can accommodate all the children aged 10-18 and that is simply untrue.
I guess you didn't read my post carefully as I specified this was the case for the past 2 years. Yes, there were exceptions prior to that (I know my 8yo niece stayed with my 4yo daughter and 4yo nephew in the club in 2008), but I was just talking about the past 2 years specifically.
It is also untrue that the ONLY time a child is moved from one space to the other is because they request it or because one space has closed for the evening. They WILL move a child for an age-appropriate activity or to even out the child to counselor ratio, even if that child doesn't request the change. Implying otherwise to first-timers is unwise and may create an issue for CM's when confused parents demand to know why their child was moved.
This has never happened to any of my kids, my nieces/nephews, or friends kids on any of our DCL cruises under the newer system (meaning since they have allowed all ages to mingle, so past 2 years). Never once. We asked them every single time we picked them up if they asked to switch clubs or if they were arbitrarily moved. Every time they said they asked to switch. We also asked the CMs when that policy first started and they assured us that kids are only moved if they ask to move. Exceptions being like I mentioned in my earlier post, when they close down one club for the night or when they do boy/girl chill. But those weren't moving by ages, one was by gender and the other was anyone remaining in the club.
Now, what I have seen them do was move counselors to the other club if they needed more supervision on one side. That has happened several times that I saw, and is also what they told us they would do if there was an imbalance in the number of kids on each side.
What you're suggesting is that they have moved kids against their will, causing unhappy kids, sort of like what people are complaining about now. Yet, I have never seen a post here complaining of that, nor, like I said, experienced it myself. I just imagine that would have lead to a ton of kids paging their parents to complain that they were moved to the other side. And then parents would say "Why did you move *MY* child and not some other kid?!?!"
Did this ever happen to you? If so, how did it play out? Cause that's something that would send me to guest services or to meet with the director of kids programming to find out why that happened, since they have stated to me that it would not. Plus I would want to know how they choose the kids to move. I mean, what if an 8yo is participating in an activity in the Club and they say "Oh well, too crowded here, we're moving you!"? My own 8yo would be very upset and would page me, hence me being upset if I was doing something of my own.
And lastly, if you don't have a dog in this fight, why bother coming here to pinpoint our posts and contradict us (and suggest that someone cancel their dinner reservation so your friend can have it - that was a nice touch)? That response was lighthearted in reply to someone who said we should all boycott Palo. Cause that won't work. For everyone who does boycott, there will be people waiting in line for their space. Like my friend. I'm sincerely not trying to be rude, I just don't understand why someone would take the time to tell us that we are basically wrong and worried over nothing - if your kids are going to be happy no matter what. No one said DCL was trying to "ruin anyone's cruise." Of course our children are going to "survive" if they don't get their first choice of location. That doesn't change the fact that DCL has made a significant change to children's programming that has some of us concerned and that we'd like to address - as is our right.
I am commenting here to try to calm down the hysteria that is building over what might not be anything at all. The people who have done it aren't claiming it is as bad as people here are imagining it to be. That is why I "wasted my time", to try to help people calm down and not start cancelling vacations or thinking it will be the trip from hell. Plus, I have 3 kids, so I very much do have a dog in this fight, so to speak. While I likely won't use the open houses with my older kids, cause I'd have to pay for nursery time, I might use them for my 2yo. She'd love playing in the Club during open house hours, so that part works out well for me. But the biggest thing I like about the new policy is that no adults are allowed to hang out in the club. I HATED that in the old system and am so, so glad they changed it.
I'm unsubscribing and done commenting on this thread, as I fear the posts may begin to tend toward intentionally inflammatory. Conservative Hippie - I will send you DCL's response via PM when I get one. I hope that no matter how things shake out, everyone has an awesome cruise! I'm sure the folks at Disney are doing everything they can to see to it that we all do.
I'm not sure why you think anything is intentionally inflammatory nor feel the need to unsubscribe, as nothing I have read, nor written, thus far is intentionally inflammatory. Well, I suppose one could read your 2nd to last paragraph that way, but I didn't as I couldn't care less about message board darts. But I will say phrases like "nice touch" aren't generally well-regarded unless they are sincere.