Hanks says no but Allen says its a go

BRERALEX

That's a wrap.
Joined
Mar 8, 2001
Messages
917
Disney to proceed without Pixar
Weeks after Tom Hanks said he would consider doing Toy Story 3 for Disney without Pixar depending on the creative team, Tim Allen came right out and said he absolutely would do Toy Story 3 under those circumstances, assuming Disney finds a replacement as good as the Pixar team. Should Disney and Pixar split, Disney would own the franchises Pixar created under their distribution deal, including Toy Story and The Incredibles.
“I think I’m totally reliant on whether they have a script, because I’m not really beholden to anybody on that [issue],” Allen said. “I would trust them to do it mechanically, they can recreate those characters. But if they can get the magic that Pixar had, then I don't think anybody’s going to complain about it.”

Pixar board of directors member, and Allen’s Christmas with the Kranks director Joe Roth does not think it’s possible to maintain the integrity of Toy Story without Pixar.


“They don’t have people that are nearly talented enough to do them,” Roth said. “I wouldn’t call that compromise. If I put you up against a 300 lb. Lineman from the New York Giants, I wouldn’t call that compromise, I’d call that slaughter. So comparing John Lasseter, Brad Bird and Pete Doctor to somebody being farmed out of Toronto doing a made for video… these are things that are not made by legions of people. These things are made by artists. Four or five people at Pixar up there who are the creative heads are Picasso to Wal Mart. So I think it’s more than an accident that these movies are as good as they are and as successful as they are. So no, I don't think a machine shop can do work on the Cistene Chapel.’
And Roth is not alone in this assessment. “I think they’re suggesting it,” he continued. “Didn’t Bob Eiger say in an interview in London that Disney was a difficult place for creative people to come to and for creative works to come to the surface? This is not an anti-Disney conversation. This is simply recognizing what Pixar really is, which sometimes it takes people distance to see it. But John Lasseter is as talented as anybody in the storytelling business right now.”

But neither Allen nor Roth have ruled out a reconciliation between Disney and Pixar. “I wouldn’t throw out the reunification of those companies though,” Allen said, “From where I sit, it’s a really good marriage that had a rocky period. I don't think there’s anybody that’s better suited for each other. All the people I still love at Disney, love and admire the bright people of [Pixar]. There’s so much attraction and affection between those two companies.”

Roth concurred. “I wouldn’t rule it out either. Just wait and see who the magic is.” However, Roth implied that Warner Brothers is a strong contender to take over the deal, despite Steve Jobs’ antagonistic comments about The Incredibles beating Warners’ The Polar Express at the box office. “Believe me, I think if Warner Brothers had the opportunity to be the distributor of Pixar in the future, they would probably forgive the statement,” Roth said. “I think they’re considering everything, but I think it’s fair to say Warner Brothers is certainly one of the studios in the forefront.”
 
Maybe I'm not reading this correctly, but where does Hanks so "no"?

I see at as "Hanks says maybe".

Am I wrong (and I sure might be)?
 
Originally posted by BRERALEX
“They don’t have people that are nearly talented enough to do them,” Roth said. “I wouldn’t call that compromise. If I put you up against a 300 lb. Lineman from the New York Giants, I wouldn’t call that compromise, I’d call that slaughter. So comparing John Lasseter, Brad Bird and Pete Doctor to somebody being farmed out of Toronto doing a made for video… these are things that are not made by legions of people. These things are made by artists. Four or five people at Pixar up there who are the creative heads are Picasso to Wal Mart. So I think it’s more than an accident that these movies are as good as they are and as successful as they are. So no, I don't think a machine shop can do work on the Cistene Chapel.’
I guess Roth missed this from the article about Toy Story 3 which is linked in the thread below on this subject:

Andrew Millstein, who headed the company's now-shuttered animation facility in Orlando, also is involved and has begun the process of recruiting animation heavyweights from rival animation studios and effects shops.
 
Originally posted by CarnotaurDad
Maybe I'm not reading this correctly, but where does Hanks so "no"?

I see at as "Hanks says maybe".

Am I wrong (and I sure might be)?
Actually, you're right, and, really, Tim Allen is saying "maybe" also.
 

Personally I don't think a true 3qual will ever happen.
Disney doesn't have the technology and the stars arent' going to jump onto a project like some of the other disasters.

It may be a straight to DVD with B list voices like Aladdin 2 when Robin williams refused to voice the genie.
 
Originally posted by dzneelvr
Personally I don't think a true 3qual will ever happen.
Disney doesn't have the technology and the stars arent' going to jump onto a project like some of the other disasters.
The technology shouldn't be an issue--the technology gap between Pixar and others has narrowed considerably (plus we're talking about a Pixar look originally from several years ago), and Disney has the right to use the digital characters developed by Pixar.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom