I don't think the intent is to deny her white genes. In fact, Halle has never been bashful about her lineage. The rule i'm referring to is the 1 drop rule which was created during slavery in an effort to not taint the white race. Basically, if a person had as little as 1 drop of black blood that person was considered black...sad, but true and it is still applied and practiced today.ETA: when a biracial child is born, the race is checked as black. The race of the parents are listed, black and white, but the childs race is listed as black. True.

It totally makes sense that someone would hold on to that idea.![]()

Society will see her as black, look at Obama- our first "black" president, even though he is biracial. I don't disagree with Hallie's view but I think its sad that she doesn't acknowledge her dd's fathers part in making her.
yes she is. she's such a little cutie too.
but what really gets me, and not just with Halle Barry and her situation is that she too is the child of an interacial couple. her mother, who I have read she is very close too, is white. so WHY deny one side of your heritage? can't you embrace both? must we DEFINE our children that way. IMO, this is exactly how hate and lack of tolerance develop.
whooo, wait a minute guys. Halle nor the President make up these rules. for the most part this is pretty much how White america has made the rules for the last say 200 years.
This hate and lack of tolerance did not just suddenly developed. heck there was a big uproar when the census was changed to say biracial.
Now you get all shocked and shaken that it's like that? the president is a little younger than me and as far as I know if either one of your parents is black the child is black.
Believe me, we did not come up with these rules.
I doubt that anyone in this thread knows enough to classify either parent in any substantive way. All we ever see is what the media chooses to show us, and often that's shaped both a combination of what celebrities choose to share with them (typically the positive), and what the media itself can fabricate from incomplete "facts" (typically the negative). The vast majority of all reality is actually more neutral than anything else, so the one thing we can be sure about is that we rarely hear anything more than a very very small portion of reality.
I do think that a lot of folks feel that it is fun to traffic in disparging perceptions of celebrities, without much regard to whether it really is firmly based on reliable and comprehensive understanding. I don't think it really serves any constructive purpose - more likely it is significantly destructive.
It totally makes sense that someone would hold on to that idea.![]()
What?? This is the culturally accepted norm(by both Black and White peoples) and the one set down by law as well when it comes to birth certificates and the U.SA. Census. Why don't you know that and why would you try to turn it into racism?
Unless maybe you think it's 'better to be one or the other??? Would THAT be your issue? In other words, why do you care?



I always thought the "one drop rule" was put in place by bigots to keep black people "in their place" sort of speak. Why anyone would continue this baffles me.![]()
I think you're directing blame in the wrong direction: It is the people who care about celebrities' private lives that are the underlying fuel for the fire.I wish celebrities would keep their private lives, private. The rest of the world does not need to know the details of this custody battle.
whooo, wait a minute guys. Halle nor the President make up these rules. for the most part this is pretty much how White america has made the rules for the last say 200 years. Last time I checked a history book, President Obama pretty much is the first and only black president we've had. what's the issue with that?
This hate and lack of tolerance did not just suddenly developed. heck there was a big uproar when the census was changed to say biracial.
Now you get all shocked and shaken that it's like that? the president is a little younger than me and as far as I know if either one of your parents is black the child is black.
Believe me, we did not come up with these rules.
I do not understand why the 'rule' which was used to classify people so that they could be discrimated against would some that anyone would continue to embrace. ME!! I don't get it.
Pretty darn sure that doesn't make me a racist.
I also do not understand why in 2011 if a child MUST be classified, why this rule would still apply. Seems to be a new classification would be more appropropriate.
Or maybe let's just not classify ourselves by race.![]()
You said it better than I did. That's exactly what I was thinking.
Yes very true. We almost always only hear one side of the story, and we can almost always safely assume that nothing presented is balanced view of the actual situation being discussed.I think you can say this about a lot of threads on here. Many times we don't know the whole situation, just what is being told to us.
Indeed, including equal consideration of all the alternative explanations for the situation.That doesn't mean that we can't have a discussion or opinion on what we do know or are being told.
Not always. I am white and my DH is mixed, but considers himself black. When both of our children were born, the race checked was white. Maybe they go by what the child looks like? Or maybe what race the mother is? My children are very light, especially my son. I don't think the average person would think they were black or maybe even mixed.ETA: when a biracial child is born, the race is checked as black. The race of the parents are listed, black and white, but the childs race is listed as black. True.
Who said there was an issue with Obama being black? Maybe I missed something, but I didn't see anyone posting that had an issue with it.
I didn't think anyone was shocked and shaken about it.