Great Society: Part 2?

There's a lot of sore loser talk going on around this place. Why not try and relax a little? Let the new team fix things for ya. Lord knows your guy has made a huge mess of it. :thumbsup2



:thumbsup2 Now now now, it's much easier not to wait and see and give Obama a chance. And goodness knows it must be better for the human spirit. :goodvibes
 
I don't know. Do you know?

What I DO know is that putting our citizens back to work will feed money back into our economy. The same economy that is struggling right now. The same citizens who are struggling right now.

I agree 100% I don't understand how trying to get people back into jobs is a bad thing. Of course some people will never be happy with anything Obama does.
 
I'm really surprised that more people don't see the parallels between now and the original "New Deal". The original "New Deal" wasn't all that great a deal.

And it didn't work. In fact, in may have prolonged the depression. What worked was WWII.
 
I agree 100% I don't understand how trying to get people back into jobs is a bad thing. Of course some people will never be happy with anything Obama does.

See post #40.
 

There's a lot of sore loser talk going on around this place. Why not try and relax a little? Let the new team fix things for ya. Lord knows your guy has made a huge mess of it. :thumbsup2

Actually, I was planning a consistent and principled stand on the issues once President-elect Obama takes office........

just like the Democrats did after the 2000 election (lest we forget). /s :rotfl:

& having failed that (like they did), I plan to trademark "I told you so" and sell bumperstickers to cover my enormous tax burden.

:)
 
I agree 100% I don't understand how trying to get people back into jobs is a bad thing. Of course some people will never be happy with anything Obama does.

Of course, it isn't. Who said it was? But... do we really want all those people working for the (all ready) bloated government? Directly or indirectly.
 
Why can't some posters just state their opposing views? Why must they personally attack those who don't agree with them?

Because it is easier to attack someone personally and maybe they can't defend their views because they know it is flawed.
 
"Putting people back to work" in a bunch of government work programs paid for with tax dollars won't help a thing. See, it's a funny thing about government workers: THEY DON'T PAY ANY TAXES. Oh, sure, they get the usual deductions out of their paychecks like everyone else does, but since their ENTIRE paycheck is taxpayer money, they are simply sending a little of it back. Government workers make NO CONTRIBUTIONS whatsoever to the tax coffers, so increasing their numbers without a serious pro-business agenda is economic suicide.

If Barack Obama wants to "put people back to work" and "save the economy" he'll make sure it's private enterprise that thrives by lowering business taxes, limiting costly regulations, keeping energy costs down by drilling for oil while also seeking alternative energy, and keeping the capital gains tax (which represents an investment in private enterprise) as low as it is or lower. If he doesn't do those things, then he either doesn't understand economics or isn't serious about jobs growth and wants a nation of dependent people instead. Government jobs — and bloated social welfare programs — only last as long as private businesses and their employees continue paying taxes.

I totally agree.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom