bookgirl2632
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- Messages
- 2,022
I'm just seeing this. Have there been any firm dates mentioned for this ride closure? We're going in late September/early October, so I'm hoping we get to ride it one last time.
Yeah I wish they would just update it rather than get rid of it. Leave a couple scenes but change our others.Hubby and I rode this 2 weeks ago since we knew it wouldn't be around for long. We also wanted to remind ourselves on our opinion of it. We both agree it's a very well done ride. We also noticed that a lot of people seemed very bored. I always get roasted when I say this stuff, but it's not relevant to younger generations. Our 15 year old only knew about the Indiana Jones movies. He's never seen a lot of the movies that were portrayed in this ride. As the demographics change so must the entertainment, imo. Disney has to appeal to its audience.
Yeah I wish they would just update it rather than get rid of it. Leave a couple scenes but change our others.
No if GMR closes it will close for good for something new and different.Oh, that's not what they're doing?
ETA: for some reason I thought they were just going to redo it. I don't know where I got that from. Maybe because like you, I wish they'd do that.
I think it would be sorta cool to end the stunt show and put in the Indiana Jones ride.
Hubby and I rode this 2 weeks ago since we knew it wouldn't be around for long. We also wanted to remind ourselves on our opinion of it. We both agree it's a very well done ride. We also noticed that a lot of people seemed very bored. I always get roasted when I say this stuff, but it's not relevant to younger generations. Our 15 year old only knew about the Indiana Jones movies. He's never seen a lot of the movies that were portrayed in this ride. As the demographics change so must the entertainment, imo. Disney has to appeal to its audience.
Oh, that's not what they're doing?
ETA: for some reason I thought they were just going to redo it. I don't know where I got that from. Maybe because like you, I wish they'd do that.
I think it would be sorta cool to end the stunt show and put in the Indiana Jones ride.
I hope this doesn't sound like roasting b/c that's not my intent.Just wanted to mention that most kids haven't seen these movies if they weren't exposed to them at home, so naturally those kids are gonna be bored during this ride. Doesn't mean we have to tailor Disney to only their exposure and interests (not that that is what you are implying). I agree, though, as demographics change so must the entertainment be expanded to include them but not at the expense of forgetting other demographic groups that appreciate the older classic rides at Disney, like this one.
My DD is 14 and has had a love for older movies (and new ones too) since she was little b/c she was exposed to it... Wizard of Oz, Bedknobs & Broomsticks, White Christmas, ET, Mary Poppins, Sound of Music, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, the original Parent Trap, etc. My husband even got her to watch Dirty Harry for the first time a few weeks ago and at the start she thought it was lame and then she ended up really liking the movie and Clint Eastwood's character, lol.
I guess it's just like I mentioned earlier, classic movies are just like classic books, they are classics for a reason. It's neat when my DD reads a classic book in her honors Language Arts class and we can share our thoughts with each other on it. Same with the movies... It's cool to see her take on a movie I loved as a kid and as I got older. It's a way to bring the generations a little closer together.
As I also mentioned earlier, I hope the new ride will have staying power and become a new classic with new technology but sad to see TGMR go instead of being updated a bit to include newer classics.
So new ride system with perks!!!Hmm... LPS, Preshow rooms, queue extension will be needed, load is in load, this is the Cousin of Alcatraz, a happy balance of screen and set... Yeah, I think that is all I can give away at the moment... Oh right, you get animatronics!
I hope this doesn't sound like roasting b/c that's not my intent.Just wanted to mention that most kids haven't seen these movies if they weren't exposed to them at home, so naturally those kids are gonna be bored during this ride. Doesn't mean we have to tailor Disney to only their exposure and interests (not that that is what you are implying). I agree, though, as demographics change so must the entertainment be expanded to include them but not at the expense of forgetting other demographic groups that appreciate the older classic rides at Disney, like this one.
My DD is 14 and has had a love for older movies (and new ones too) since she was little b/c she was exposed to it... Wizard of Oz, Bedknobs & Broomsticks, White Christmas, ET, Mary Poppins, Sound of Music, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, the original Parent Trap, etc. My husband even got her to watch Dirty Harry for the first time a few weeks ago and at the start she thought it was lame and then she ended up really liking the movie and Clint Eastwood's character, lol.
I guess it's just like I mentioned earlier, classic movies are just like classic books, they are classics for a reason. It's neat when my DD reads a classic book in her honors Language Arts class and we can share our thoughts with each other on it. Same with the movies... It's cool to see her take on a movie I loved as a kid and as I got older. It's a way to bring the generations a little closer together.
As I also mentioned earlier, I hope the new ride will have staying power and become a new classic with new technology but sad to see TGMR go instead of being updated a bit to include newer classics.
With all the land they own, I never understood why they just don't refurb older rides instead of completely gutting them and turning them into something different. I get that they must do that sort of thing at Disneyland because of the lack of space, but why at WDW? As a previous poster said, they could replace a couple of scenes with newer films, and freshen up the existing ones with their latest tech, but I don't think they need to be replacing existing rides (Ellen's/Norway/etc...). More rides means more crowd distribution.
Just my two cents.
With that said, GMR is a people eater and DHS needs that. The new ride would not have that aspect.Agreed, but more rides also equal more operational cost and maintenance. The older the ride, the harder it is to maintain.
Here's the problem with tacking on an age thing with this broad "younger folk" thought-process....I'm 28 will be 29 next month. My husband is 27 will be 28 in July. We enjoy GMR-it's not our favorite but it's not unliked either. I assure you as be under 30 (even right at the cutoff) those classics are what I grew up with. My iffiness with GMR is usually the inconsistencies I felt when it came to the CMs doing our tour not with the lack of interest in the theming.I understand what you are saying about exposure, but exposure to old movies is harder nowadays. I grew up in the 1980s and 1990s. We had cable sometimes, we eventually had a VHS player.
Anyhow, my point is that if we wanted to watch something, we either saw it in the theater, waited for it to come on tv, or maybe went to the video store to rent (as I got a little older). Some of us had video game systems and eventually PCs, but many of us did not have those as options all the time. I watched a lot of reruns. I know when my mom was younger (60s and 70s), they would even re-release movies often in the theater.
My kids, though, when they want to watch something or are allowed to watch something...have infinite choices on demand. Not to mention all the good shows and movies that have come out in the last 20 years. And not to mention the things the apps, video games, videos that aren't movies, etc. that they can watch (I mean how can Wizard of Oz compete with watching some guy play Minecraft or a lady opening Easter eggs on YouTube? lol).
Anyhow, long story shorter, I can see how people under say 30 might not be as interested in the classics, and I think it is more of a whole cultural/technological shift than just exposure.