Full out abductions are rare because the molesters know getting out of the park is problematic. Much more likely is the 'toucher' or picture taker. Taking simple, zero-effort precautions against these people is neither paranoid, nor is it counter-productive. How exactly does it distract my attention from other dangers?
While you're protecting your children, are you also teaching the children how to protect themselves? Are you preparing them for the dangers they will inevitably face in the real world when they finally do go out on their own? Are you building their
confidence in their own abilities, or are you building their
fears of the unknown into a debilitating paranoia?
Some precautions may be
zero-effort, but they are not always
zero-consequence. Increased safety is not the only consequence of paranoid hyper-vigilance; it's prudent to evaluate ALL consequences of any action before taking the action.
When I post questions like this, many parents say that I am being ridiculous or stupid, and they either get angry with me for my criticism, or laugh it off as they totally ignore me for being a "fool", or question my own experience with raising children as being inadequate. "You don't understand!" they often say in that angry, condescending manner. "It's not the same world any more! There are sickos everywhere! Everywhere is dangerous! Trust no-one! If it saves even ONE child, isn't it worth ANY effort? MY child's safety is more important than YOUR discomfort! You don't know what you're talking about!"
As I said before, I'm not saying that no parents should ever bring youngsters into opposite-sex public restrooms as a safety precaution. I just think it's important to keep the actual dangers in perspective, and not to over-react to a danger that's serious, but not nearly as prevalent as some people think.
Well, be prepared to hear! These are just over the past couple of months:
http://bit.ly/15FFlR
not read about the molester at the water park last week?
Apples to rutabagas. I'm talking about theme parks, you're talking about water parks. Five incidents in the Orlando water parks this summer - any in a theme park bathroom in that time? Or any part of a theme park?
Water parks are a completely different environment than theme parks, with hundreds of semi-nude strangers mixing in waist-deep (or deeper) water, often with waves or turbulence that make it impossible to see what's happening under the water. The water offers anonymity that even a theme park crowd can't match, and the close proximity and skimpy clothing offer more opportunities for "accidental" contact. And those "accidental" contacts are more likely to be dismissed as real accidents by those in the water.
The lowlife scumbags who have been caught fondling children in the water parks lately were caught because they were stupidly brazen. Fortunately, most of those pervs are also morons, and eventually get caught because they can't think clearly enough to get away with it.