- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 45,036
Agree it sold better, but at the time, RIV had better incentives that made it cheaper than VGF. We waffled between VGF or RIV but went with VGF. I think ultimately for many buyers it comes down to initial buy-in cost. VGF had its initial run, then slowed. RIV is better built resort than the VGF cheap hotel refurb. But VGF original was a home run. Curious about the new poly tower. I tend to think they just might add it to the original poly. It will still get in 40 years - which is all BCV had when new and it sold out fast. I think if RIV is not sold out by the time poly goes on sale - they may reassess the restrictions. If DVC wanted to bite into resale market, the blue card and extras are okay - but trading policies within the same system?? I don't own any other time share but as far as I know no other does that.
It then proves that price and other factors are much more important to buyers than the restrctions…that was more my point.
So, DVD knows that restricted resorts can sell against non restricted ones as long as they price it well.
And, even the current numbers put the two pretty even. But, it also shows that a non restricted resort doesn’t sell well either if it isn’t priced to high. VGF sales, other than the first few months, have not been good and they don’t have restrictions.
That is why I think they will stick with restrictions. RIV had a lot of points to sell and the pandemic and current economic conditions are not helping tings.
I don’t think RIV needs to sell out prior to Poly tower because the data doesn’t support it is restrictions that are impacting the sales. If they were that big of a deal, it would have never had done so well against VGF…double the points sold…when the price difference wasnt that huge on an average 200 point contract.