Sydnerella
enough is as good as a feast
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,469
First - FP enforcement "doom and gloom" did occur UNCFanatik - touring in Spring Break 2012 was far less easy/enjoyable than previously. We rode fewer rides, missed some FP times and generally criss crossed more. And I knew and planned for the change well in advance. That is just a fact - it was not better for us, it was worse.
Second - I think all would agree that attending a party and eating all the cupcakes before the other guests arrive is rude Mousemerf. And it is not remotely the same as attending a paid for venue and soaking up as much as you can early to avoid the lines and maximize your dollars/time/fun. As many guide books and websites have promoted. Heck we do this everywhere - State Fair, we book the first b-day parties of the day at venues, get to the waterpark before it is crowded, etc... This is not rude - it is what works for our family.
Third - It is indeed "OK" or dare I say natural to be pretty disappointed by the thought of riding your favorite rides fewer times, waiting more in longer lines and spending just as much money to enter the parks if not more than you did before FP+. I don't get why there is any disagreement around this fairly obvious point.
If there are no same day FP available, the mid-day and beyond touring for our family will be changed significantly. And, yes, believe it or not, I am actually disappointed by that. Shocking and almost presumptuous of me to be disappointed in such a touring downgrade at a place we love so much.
It's particularly vexing when the premise is to get me to spend even more money than I already do under the guise of trying to "deliver the best possible experience for our guests" When it is crystal clear that they are indeed not going to deliver to me nor the thousands of other "smart park goers" a better experience. Fair to be bummed about that IMO.
I can feel a paranoid comment coming but in a strange way, it's like enforcing socialism to promote increased capitalism.... Mandate fair distribution so Disney can make even more money. Bizzare, probably genious, and likely will be a money-maker for them...
Sydnerella's Mama
Second - I think all would agree that attending a party and eating all the cupcakes before the other guests arrive is rude Mousemerf. And it is not remotely the same as attending a paid for venue and soaking up as much as you can early to avoid the lines and maximize your dollars/time/fun. As many guide books and websites have promoted. Heck we do this everywhere - State Fair, we book the first b-day parties of the day at venues, get to the waterpark before it is crowded, etc... This is not rude - it is what works for our family.
Third - It is indeed "OK" or dare I say natural to be pretty disappointed by the thought of riding your favorite rides fewer times, waiting more in longer lines and spending just as much money to enter the parks if not more than you did before FP+. I don't get why there is any disagreement around this fairly obvious point.
If there are no same day FP available, the mid-day and beyond touring for our family will be changed significantly. And, yes, believe it or not, I am actually disappointed by that. Shocking and almost presumptuous of me to be disappointed in such a touring downgrade at a place we love so much.
It's particularly vexing when the premise is to get me to spend even more money than I already do under the guise of trying to "deliver the best possible experience for our guests" When it is crystal clear that they are indeed not going to deliver to me nor the thousands of other "smart park goers" a better experience. Fair to be bummed about that IMO.

I can feel a paranoid comment coming but in a strange way, it's like enforcing socialism to promote increased capitalism.... Mandate fair distribution so Disney can make even more money. Bizzare, probably genious, and likely will be a money-maker for them...

Sydnerella's Mama