But the need for the data is so much larger there as a result. In WDW they at least have the tens of thousands of resort rooms to give them an indication of how many people are coming. In DL they need to worry about thousands of spontaneous guests showing up out of the blue when the weather is nice, if they made them plan a bit more it would give them much more reliable data.
What I dont like about the NE ticket, as an evil bean counter, is that it can be used at any time in the future, over any span of years. And I dont like it, because I cant forecast when its going to be used, and how. Not until its put in play. Worse, it can be put in play, book fp+'s with it 60 days out, sit like that until the day of use, and not be used at all. The ticket is already purchased, there is no time expirey, and phantom bookings can happen.
Can someone explain to me how this line of thinking works? I see it quite a bit and I can't quite wrap my head around it.
Are we saying when Mine Train opens for instance fewer people will want to ride space mountain so some of the people that would have waited in line at Space will ride at Mine Train instead? Does that assume a constant crowd level? If the new attraction attracts more people doesn't that increase all lines?
Are we saying that it only applies with the park at maximum capacity and that the construction to build the new attraction or area did not impact the capacity figure?
If it is just redistributing people to more attractions in the parks to lower lines how does that help Disney make more money?
So if this system is going to fail, and even we can see how it is going to fail making lines shorter, why are they doing it? Because my friends LINES will be shorter for the newb, the casual visitor, and the infrequent visitor. Not YOU, but THEM.
But if I used to get 6-7 fastpasses a day, and can now only get 3, doesn't that mean I'll be waiting in MORE lines?
But then I guess that I would be balanced out by all of the 80% who used to get NO fastpasses and will now spend less time waiting in lines.
Precisely the point I've been making. Is it worth being able to pre-schedule Space Mountain, Soarin' and TSMM when the trade-off is that I now cannot get a FP for Test Track, Tower of Terror, RnRC, Splash Mountain, BTMRR, and others? If the ability to use FP extensively goes away and we have to wait standby for all rides except those few we have pre-booked, then I'd say the "cost" does not outweigh the benefit for the guest. Whether the "cost" outweighs the benefit for Disney is another matter altogether.
True. But as I said previously, in order to redistribute those FP opportunities to the masses, each guest will be extremely limited, making the benefit very small for everyone.
I've been reading this thread, very interesting...Anyway, had to chime in...I totally agree with this post. The idea is to redistribute the FPs more evenly. Across the entire day and across more guests. I also agree that they don't care so much about the return guests who they think will probably come back regardless, they need to keep a steady flow of new guests coming. When people go home complaining about lines, that's not good for business.
As a disclaimer, I'm excited for the new FP system. It will fit the way we tour nicely, if it is what I think it is anyway.![]()
I can buy a regular EXPIRING MYW ticket and "hold onto it" indefinitely and do the same thing.
Buying a non-expiring ticket and using it over time is no worse, nor better, in curbing "phantom FP+ reservations."
Nobody knows what kind of counter-measures may or may not be put in place if this issue is
problematic for Disney, but no need to drop NE tickets because of it.
I don't think it is fair to say they aren't focused on repeat business just a constant stream of first timers.
If they convert this new stream of first timers into repeat visitors, those repeat visitors will know and be comfortable with the system they learned on when they were new and be better at it, and still happy.
I've been going to WDW for almost 40 years, been dozens of times. I still don't use more than 3-4 fp in a day, the precision needed to get to 6 or 7 would not be enjoyable to me.
I like the look of the new system and look forward to trying it out.
I'm not asking why DL would want the data. But, would this be worth upsetting such a large proportion of their customers? It's been said numerous times that WDW doesn't care about the frequent visitors, and as long as the newbies are happy with FP+, WDW will be OK. They don't care about their current frequent visitors, they'll get new ones.
This attitude clearly won't work in DL. Again, my post that you replied to was in response to Rileygirl's post about how FP+ will work for WDW only because they can target it towards the new/infrequent guest.
We'll have to agree to disagree on this point. I'll readily eat crow if proven wrong, but I maintain that lines will not be shorter for them either. Sure, they will be tossed the bone of a couple of FP+s, but wait times OVERALL will almost certainly be longer for them as well.
But there are probably far fewer tickets being purchased and not used within a reasonable amount of time than NE tickets with entitlements remaining unused for a long time.
Appointment riding Squidgy, ask mom2rtk about it! Its going to be more then 3 during most of the year, and at holiday and peak season, disney will be gettin you to pay for optional stuff!
ok- seriously, gtg!
I can buy a regular EXPIRING MYW ticket and "hold onto it" indefinitely and do the same thing.
Buying a non-expiring ticket and using it over time is no worse, nor better, in curbing "phantom FP+ reservations."
Disneyland tickets expire December 31 each year. You can't buy ahead. It's my understanding that the NE ticket was purely a Walt Disney World model.
One Disney: DisneyParks