I understand life happens, and i feel for the people who are losing their home due to circumstances beyond their control. However to take a loan you know you can not afford is the same as someone who pays off their credit card every month using the full limit they are granted and amazed when the bill comes and its more than they make in a month. For example say some one has a 30k limit on their credit card but they only have 10k a month income, is its the banks fault for giving them a 30k limit, or does personal responsibility come into play?
Personal responsibility does come into play.
The situation with credit cards and houses are two different things.
Used to be the mortgage loan officer set people down and told them what they could afford using debt to income ratios and made people clean up debt to qualify for a loan.
They had different ratios for different types of loans, ie Va, FHA or Conventional.
Than they all figured out how to do all sorts of things based on what might happen in the future, ie, get another job get a raise get married and have someone to help pay the loan, whatever. Things such as balloon payments and adjustable rates linked to the prime rate.
Then, it got even more scary - with subprime lending and hucksters out there who just wanted your signature on something no matter what. heck they'd find a way to clean things up and market the loan and sell it and they would not ever have to worry about it again. By the time people were making their first payment they were dealing with a different bank.
And back to the little guy with his bride in tow who thought he could afford a 'big' house - most times it was the first time inside a real estate office. Most times they would trust their 'bank' to have their best interests at heart - that littel thing called fiduciary duty. these people were working to help them get their dream house, right? Not. Not any more. Something really major changed. The American Dream became the American ________. Fill in the blank. Nightmare maybe?
Oh yes - there were plenty of greedy consumers! No doubt.
But that doesn't change the fact that the rules changed. And that the picture painted as normal for the times was not real.
Many people rode the wave expecting it to continue, not recognizing that it was an artificially stimulated environment - created to make a few people wealthy.
so where do you place the blame? On the greedy little guy who wanted more house then he could afford? Or on the greedy banking industry that figured a way to move around lots of money without true value? Or on the government for the bailouts? I see everyone pointing fingers at the other guy and nobody shouldering responsibility - just looking for a way out.