lurkyloo
The Attic was just perfect!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2006
- Messages
- 15,682
Tracy will have great answers to these questions, but I'd like to chime in too!
Standard will be grainy-looking on a hi-def TV and at large sizes. Well, not so much grainy as blurry-pixel-y. I mean, it's not terrible, but once you get used to seeing everything in HD, regular looks a little lackluster. On the other hand, HD reveals everything, so if the videographer zooms in for a closeup, you're gonna see every line and blemish the makeup artist couldn't cover.
Exactlyplus, it means that you'll have every possible recorded moment instead of just an edited "story" version of the day. Your videographer will make judgments about what to cut out to enhance the flow of your final video (as s/he should), but that means you won't see every single moment of your day. Some people like to have the raw footage just so they can see it all.
Book as many hours as you need to capture all the main events. If you aren't having a big reception with some spectacular surprise at the end (like confetti cannons), you can probably send the videographer home after the cake-cutting. If you don't need lots of getting-ready footage or a "first look," you could probably start videography 30 minutes before the ceremony.
As for features, a lot of what's included in videographers' packages is needless bells and whistles: special title graphics, cheesy special effects, engraved DVD cases, credits sequencesthat's all just window-dressing if all you want is a simple record of the day. We'll see what Tracy says, but I think most of the budget should go shooting hours, toward multiple camera operators and plenty of editing time.
1. What would the differences be between standard or high def? Would standard be grainy looking?
Standard will be grainy-looking on a hi-def TV and at large sizes. Well, not so much grainy as blurry-pixel-y. I mean, it's not terrible, but once you get used to seeing everything in HD, regular looks a little lackluster. On the other hand, HD reveals everything, so if the videographer zooms in for a closeup, you're gonna see every line and blemish the makeup artist couldn't cover.

2. What would getting the raw footage mean, exactly? Getting a copy of everything that was shot, in addition to the edited video? Would the advantage of that be having the option to "redo" the final video later if I wasn't happy with it?
Exactlyplus, it means that you'll have every possible recorded moment instead of just an edited "story" version of the day. Your videographer will make judgments about what to cut out to enhance the flow of your final video (as s/he should), but that means you won't see every single moment of your day. Some people like to have the raw footage just so they can see it all.
I don't know what features I should be sure to get and what I could do without, I haven't a clue how many hours I would need to book in order to have a good representation of the day, and I have no idea what kind of price is reasonable for good quality.
Book as many hours as you need to capture all the main events. If you aren't having a big reception with some spectacular surprise at the end (like confetti cannons), you can probably send the videographer home after the cake-cutting. If you don't need lots of getting-ready footage or a "first look," you could probably start videography 30 minutes before the ceremony.
As for features, a lot of what's included in videographers' packages is needless bells and whistles: special title graphics, cheesy special effects, engraved DVD cases, credits sequencesthat's all just window-dressing if all you want is a simple record of the day. We'll see what Tracy says, but I think most of the budget should go shooting hours, toward multiple camera operators and plenty of editing time.