A post for the others that visit our thread from time to time and won't be happy when Kerry wins:
By Glenn Reynolds
"In seven days we will have an election. If there is a merciful Higher Power, we will also have a winner and a loser. Although this has been a long and bitterly partisan campaign, it will be important for both sides to reach out to each other in the aftermath. We dont know who will win, but it may be worth reflecting on what to do if a non-victorious scenario develops (the word lose is banished from the vocabulary until Nov. 3).
As an unrelenting Republican, I have what I hope is helpful advice for folks on my side who may feel a bit lost as they try to come to terms with what might yet become a Kerry Presidency. Think of this as a little preparation to help ease the shock of transition.
First, the Recovering Republican needs to be able to come to terms with The Other. Do you have a friend or colleague whose endless praise of Michael Moore has left the two of you estranged? I recommend being the first to extend the olive branch. Then, when the other fellow extends his hand in friendship, you have a good, solid object with which to smite him. Hah! But that can only provide a fleeting satisfaction. For the longer term, you must focus on the positives of a Kerry victory. Let me help you find them.
Kerry didnt win, Hillary lost! Thats right. Hillarys plans will be on hold until 2012 if Kerry is successful. True, Recovering Republicans dont expect Kerry to be successful, but really, what is our track record here lots of people thought Clinton did fine, right? Well, lots of other people thought he did fine, anyway. And you had better be rooting for Kerry to succeed there is a war on, and failure is not an option.
These times demand the Times, and you can go back to reading it. Admit it the Times is a great paper, but it has been so anti-Bush that you can only look at it after you take two aspirin and duct tape your mouth. Under Kerry, those days will be but a grim memory. Now, you can smile each morning as the Times tries to undo two years of bias in two months by putting Kerry under the microscope. Enjoy!
Did we lose the White House? Its only a flesh wound! With a Republican Congress, Kerry cant do too much harm. Our hopes are pinned on Frist and DeLay now. Sorry, I was trying to be upbeat with that lets go on.
Relax while someone else tries to spin the latest outrage. Putting a Democrat in charge might actually make their party take a little bit of responsibility for the events of the day. This might be bracing for them, and amusing for the rest of us.
The Washington Post has a fair and balanced endorsement of John Kerry. David Broder highlights the strengths and flaws of each candidate but does not pick one. Daniel Drezner tilts for Kerry, with reservations; Gregory Djerejian makes the long case for Bush, also with reservations.
The upshot yes, this election may decide the fate of Western Civilization. But smart and concerned citizens are finding good reasons to be on either side. Trust the people to decide. And remember to exhale."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3395977/