I am beyond angry about this. We used to have Directv and switched back to Cable because we kept losing our signal everytime we had a little shower. I think if this goes on for more than a week I may look into Dish Network.
Just a note about this: There is nothing about Dish Network that will make it any less prone to outage due to interference from weather.
I just checked their rates and they are better than Directv and the equipment is cheaper.
There is a reason for the price difference between Dish Network and DirecTV. Consider Dish Network the "economy" satellite service -- the Wal-mart to DirecTV's Macy's. Depending on your preferences (i.e., price is more important than everything else), Wal-mart may be the best choice.
I will never do Fios as we have had nothing but problems with Verizon on several levels.
FiOS is considered, by most folks who have tried it, the very best of all worlds, with regard to subscription television. (Personally, I'm not sure it is really significantly better, but it surely isn't worse than any of the alternatives.) Verizon is notoriously poor when it comes to billing errors, but other than that, they win every other category when comparisons are made.
In both cases, with DirecTV and Verizon, keep in mind that your past experiences with them should be considered an
advantage. You know those companies. You might even have the names of some people there to whom you've complained before. (That is very very useful in case of future problems!) At the very least, you are much more familiar with their systems and processes. Rest assured, none of the alternative suppliers you have available to you are free from the kinds of problems you've experienced with the companies you've done business with before, and since you've never dealt with them before, you start at Ground Zero if you have a problem with them, trying to figure out who to contact to get satisfaction. You should consider
that a disadvantage of any new supplier.
And this even applies to Cablevision; the fact that you know Cablevision should be considered an advantage. They are in a dispute, now, with Scripps over the price Scripps wants for Food Network and HGTV. Conceptually, Cablevision is trying to protect its status as one of those "Wal-mart" suppliers, focusing on keeping the cost of service low, so there is less upward pressure on prices. What I foresee happening is a further differentiation in the marketplace going forward, with Cablevision perhaps being the cable version of Dish Network, the economy offering, while the price of FiOS, and DirecTV, shoot up markedly, as they become the "Tiffany" service providers. So it may pay off, if price is your major concern, to stick it out with Cablevision, at least long enough to see if they eventually do make a deal with Scripps to get your favorite channels back. It is as likely as not that whoever you switch to would end up taking Food Network and HGTV away, later, when
they have this same rate dispute with Scripps. Either that, or they'll just roll-over and take whatever increase Scripps insists on, and roll it into some price increase, because they'll recognize that providing you uninterrupted service on your favorite channels is a added-value that they deliver to you, and an added-value that they should therefore be compensated for.
I have e-mailed Cablevision AND HGTV about this because they are both to blame.
They're both doing what they're supposed to, even though it dissatisfies us. This sort of thing happens all the time when companies have different owners, and therefore different overriding obligations. It is going to be happening a lot more, in the next few years, because the whole structure of the industry is going to change. We're going to be caught in the middle, and there is nothing to do about it, unless we want to just pay whatever anyone wants to charge us, or basically be stuck watching nothing but shopping channels.
They have to stop trying to see who will give first and come to an agreement.
I wish business was that easy.
