Not to divert this thread into tax policy (but some of us do somehow enjoy doing that

) but I think the only fair way to tax a home if it is based on original purchase price plus any major improvements, completely ignoring market price. This would mean that the person who has been in their house for decades and now has no kids in school would pay the least, while the newcomers, probably younger with school age kids, would pay the most. It would incentive homeowners to put real roots into the community and move the burden to people who can better afford it.
Perfect example of this is some beach towns in NJ, 60 years ago, average blue collar workers bought tiny cape houses across the street from the ocean, for (no exaggeration) $5-20k. Today that home is worth $2M+, how can that retired blue collar couple ever be expected to keep up with the taxes on those gains?
These homestead exemption increases seem to be moving toward my ideal but someone has to explain what happens to the revenue holes it creates for towns and counties (who I'm sure will spend more on ads fighting this than the revenue they will lose

).