Finger printing etc

I think Rob has hit the nail on the head. A lot of people are moaning because they may be ''inconvenienced'' by the extra time taken at immigration. But I bet the same people are quite prepared to stand in a queue at any of the popular rides in any of the parks just to say they went on it.

You very rarely see people moaning about that!

At the end of the day it is happening whether we like or not. If people feel that strongly about it stay in the UK

Personally nothing will stop me holidaying in the US even an extra 30 minutes or so in immigration.
 
Let me guess Vernon, you are against ID cards in the UK as well!
Because of the possibilities of missuse by any future government of the day I am very much against giving over swingeing powers to our governments. Particularly while those very governments are so busy removing the powers to check up on their activities, bully or smear those that have the temerity to question their actions, they remove the Parliamentary systems that slow down them pushing through bills that are not in the best interests of the people and future of our country and when forced into having a "public hearing" into questionable,immoral or illegal activities they put it in the hands of their cronies who they can be sure will interpret their mandate in such a confined manner that they will pose no threat to the "status quo".

Rob, you've been spending too much time in the "corridors of power" their duplicity can be contagious ;) . Your argument neglects the fact that 9/11 was commited on domestic aircraft, these new "rules" would have done nothing to stop that act and do nothing to address domestic issues. You mention Spain, yet Spain already has ID card. ID cards would not stop an incident like that of Madrid occuring here (or in the US).

The war on terrorism is one that we have to win, but I fear that our governments are using the public's fear to push through legislation that have a greater potential to damage the lifestyles to which we aspire and for which our grandparents fought and died in a number of conflicts.

These moves are about Government control and their ability to keep tabs on it's population. It isn't a case of a succession of hurdles being placed in the way of a terrorist's path, as I've already stated it will just mean that terrorists (or anyone on a "watch list" ) will take a less clumbersome route into America. If America wants to stop terrorists activities it needs to concentrate on travel from Canada, Mexico by road and cross country and on travellers from the Caribbean coming in on boats (both legal and illegal).

To use a simile of themepark rides is disingenuous, it would be much more truthful to ask if there would be an objection if non US citizens had to queue for 90 minutes when those of the US only had to queue for 10. I think people (you as well grumpyJohn) would be howling from the rafters.

I have no objection to waiting in line at immigration for an hour if it would make one iota of difference to my, my family or the nations security, BUT THESE MEASURE MAKE NO DIFFERENCE (and nor would ID cards). As Rob correctly points out they are window dressing.

Will winning the war on terrorism come at the too high (IMHO) cost of losing our civil liberties? I don't believe it has to, but it seems our government believes they can use the situation to their advantage and slide these moves through while the population has been softened up with a load of scare stories and half truths they have peddled about.

This issue is more than just about terrorism, take the blinkers off and see the whole picture.
 
Originally posted by vernon
Rob, you've been spending too much time in the "corridors of power" their duplicity can be contagious ;) . Your argument neglects the fact that 9/11 was commited on domestic aircraft, these new "rules" would have done nothing to stop that act and do nothing to address domestic issues. You mention Spain, yet Spain already has ID card. ID cards would not stop an incident like that of Madrid occuring here (or in the US).

Vernon, I managed to find the escape tunnel, and now spend my time in a University. Not sure that's any closer to the real world but at least the other Profs are a little less self-important than some of my former colleagues ;)

Regards

Rob
 
I agree 100% with Vernon:earseek:

I believe it is about government control.It's about keeping its people in a state of anxiety and fear.This way when people are scared they are far less likely to question a governments operations.For example leading up to the Iraq war various things happened like an airport, can't remember if it was Heathrow or Gatwick, was closed down causing chaos because allegedly they'd seen someone with a hand grenade or something.Then nothing transpired after this.Allegedly 'they' were going to bomb a football match,make ordinary people have fear where they will feel it.All this leading up to the government wanting the electorate to back their war,which people are far more likely to do if they are SCARED.Today a plot was allegedly uncovered to use chemical weapons,call me cynical but I now don't belive a single word I hear from the government or the media.

My objection is not a half-witted moan at the extra time the finger printing/photo will take,it is an objection about this over-the-top reaction to people who want to vist a country innocently as tourists,I doubt they will ever apprehned a single terrorist with even these draconian measures.

The analogy of a the extra queing at immigration being compared with a theme park is emotive! The objections aren't about the extra queuing time for from it.

As I have said, I would love to make a stand and not visit the US,but will over ride my objections and will visit Orlando as usual.But there are many people who WILL stand by their objections and not visit.
 

PS. Thank jeebus,someone agrees with me for once;) ::yes::
 
Originally posted by vernon
There are a lot more constructive and effective things that could be done to increase security, but they won't be done because they will inconvenience Americans travelling domestically. It was afterall, lets not forget, on domestic flights that the deeds of 9/11 were performed.

There were mutterings going on the last time we were across that "if Bush doesn't get in, will they abolish or scale down the TSA" because the US travelling public are getting fed up of the "inconvenience" already, that they cause.:rolleyes:


David
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom