One of the best resources I know of for great insights into cooking equipment (among other cooking topics) is America's Test Kitchen. Here's their recommendations on cookware:
http://www.americastestkitchen.com/...document_activeCategoryName_2_3_0_mv=Cookware
Their recommendations include All Clad (though expensive), Lodge (though heavy), and Wearever Premium Hard Anodized.
The folks at Cooks Illustrated recently reviewed cookware and also recommended the brand
walmart carries, tramontina as the "best value". All Clad was the overall winner, but for that price it is not budget friendly.
http://www.cooksillustrated.com/equ...d=19463&frtk=SS3aM30hAqcl0h6FbBhiDG3iGUdGrc5u
Here is the link (that may or may not work) to their findings.
These are actually the same people as America's Test Kitchen, I believe. And I think the OP was looking for nonstick, so this link might be useful:
http://www.cooksillustrated.com/equipment/overview.asp?docid=25947
(They also reviewed some nonstick cookware back in 2006.)
I got a few pots/pans for my wedding 10 yrs ago that were calphalon, and they seemed to all lose their inner coating over time.
Calphalon has always had a few different grades of non-stick cookware. You get what you pay for, so the low-end cookware will be just like most mainstream cookware for sale at that price-point: Crap. If you want quality and longevity, you want a higher grade of cookware. If I understand correctly, Calphalon sells four grades of cookware, now. They are
- Simply Calphalon (this is the stuff you want to avoid)
- Calphalon Contemporary (this is good stuff, which may be good enough for you)
- Calphalon Unison (this is the stuff you want to buy)
- Calphalon CS (overpriced for the typical home cook)
I've had both Calphalon and Analon, and the cheap Calphalon lasted the shortest period of time, then then Analon, then the better Calphalon - which is actually still in service, some pieces for quite a while now.
I'm looking for excellent pots and pans that will go in the dishwasher...
Knowing what goes on in a dishwasher, I would be shocked to learn that they've come up with cookware that cooks things well, is convenient to use, is effectively cleaned in the dishwasher, and that lasts a long time. It is one of those "Four Criteria: Pick Two" to satisfy situations. For me, I pick the first and last criterion, and compromise on the other two. YMMV.
Make sure you don't get anything too heavy - you might want to go to the store and check them out before buying.
Someone once explained the physics of cooking to me in some detail, and from what I recall, there was a pretty strong, positive correlation between weight and why great cookware works well. Frustrating.
We have wonderful All-Clad and Le Crueset pots and pans but some of the pieces are really heavy even when empty. If your mom is older / getting older, she probably wouldn't appreciate that - my mom always comments on that when she's visiting us - that they are too hard to lift.
Very good point. Sometimes the cookware that cooks "best" may not be the best cookware for a specific cook.
Seems to me like stainless holds up the best, esp. with hand washing.
Yes, definitely, but the reason why many folks consider nonstick is because of the comparative difficulty with cleaning stainless steel. They're really not interchangeable for folks who place a high value on the convenience that nonstick provides them. However, it should be noted that that convenience clearly comes with a price, the fact that there is almost no way to compete on ground of longevity. However, that might be changing. Some of the hard anodized cookware is remarkably nonstick, and remarkably long-lasting.