Academic struggles of girls often go undetected for years
01:24 AM CST on Monday, November 10, 2003
By KENT FISCHER / The Dallas Morning News
THINKING ABOUT EDUCATION
Where are the girls?
At Dallas' Shelton School, one of the nation's largest for children with learning disabilities, preschoolers carved jack-o'-lanterns and scooped up pumpkin guts with their tiny fingers. Three-fourths of the children gathered around the table are little boys.
The Winston School, another area school that caters to the learning disabled, graduated 30 seniors last spring. Twenty-five were boys.
In public schools, the numbers aren't much different. Boys make up 75 percent of the state's special education population.
The Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children is one of the premier centers in the Southwest for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslexia. Yet the center evaluates three times as many boys as girls.
All this flies in the face of what researchers proved long ago: that learning disabilities are blind when it comes to gender. Independent studies in three states and three foreign countries all found that learning disabilities occur with nearly equal frequency in boys and girls.
So when it comes to diagnosing learning disabilities such as dyslexia, where are all the girls?
In a word: invisible.
This is not new. Educators and researchers have known for decades that the numbers are overwhelmingly skewed toward boys. Yet little has changed for girls.
"You bet, I think we're missing some girls," said Gladys Kolenovsky, the administrative director of child development at Scottish Rite.
Why?
The conventional wisdom seems to be that when a boy struggles in class he becomes disruptive. He interrupts his teacher. He hits his neighbors. He pitches a fit. The chaos often results in a "referral" a recommendation that he be evaluated by a learning specialist.
Not so with girls.
When little girls struggle they withdraw, educators say. They fake it. They pretend to read, to understand, to keep up. Secretly, though, they're falling behind.
It's cliché, but the squeaky wheel gets the grease. And girls don't squeak as often, or as loudly, as boys. As a result, only about one-third of girls who struggle get the help they need.
"Parents and teachers are more inclined to say with their daughters 'She's just quiet,' or 'That's just her learning style,' " said Ann Harris, a learning specialist at Ursuline Academy, an all-girls school on Walnut Hill Lane. "It behooves us to pay attention to our daughters and not just sweep it under the rug."
If a girl's learning disability is noticed, it's often not until late elementary or middle school, after it becomes too hard for them to keep their struggles hidden.
"Kids don't grow out of reading problems," said Dr. Patricia Mathes, the Texas Instruments Endowed Chair of Reading at SMU. "We can identify this kind of stuff in kindergarten."
Texas has in place a tool that could help solve this problem. It's called the TPRI Texas Primary Reading Inventory and it's a reading assessment that is given to all children up to five times during their first three years of school. Think of it as checkup, designed to catch struggling readers early in their academic careers. And because it's given to every student, there should be no good reason for quiet, struggling girls to continually slip by.
Trouble is, nobody can say whether schools are using the TPRI information to get girls the help they need.
For starters, there's a big difference between identifying a struggling reader and doing something about it, said Dr. Jack Fletcher, who developed the TPRI assessment at the medical school at the University of Texas-Houston. Secondly, when districts report their TPRI data to the state, they do not disaggregate it by sex, Dr. Fletcher said, and so the TPRI's impact on girls may be impossible to track.
Until that changes, many educators say, struggling girls will remain out of sight and, sadly, out of mind.