I guess this is a bit off subject, but there is a disconnect between real estate agents and sellers in traditional real estate.
They are both right in my opinion. 6% is outrageous for a seller...Paying $12,000 of your equity on a $200,000 sale. Many times it erases any gains on the investment.
But the Realtor isn't getting rich either. 6% is traditionally split with the agent who brings a buyer - leaving the Listing agent with 3%.
That 3% is split again with their Broker...usually in half again, leaving 1.5%. So about $3,000 on the sale minus expenses.
I am the last one to defend realtors as I feel there are many who are less than fantastic. I just think we should all consider the real numbers.
6% is liked being robbed while sleeping if you are a Seller, and $3,000 to put up with average Seller and sell a home in this market isn't exactly winning the lottery.
The reason traditional real estate does not sell FSBO is because most Buyers use a Realtor to show them homes. And Realtors work for commission. And If I was on commission, I would only show homes that had guaranteed commission for me if I brought a Buyer. Thats why 90% of FSBOs fail.
I think 10% to the person selling a
DVC feels like a ton. Especially if they are selling it because of drastic life changes, or financial needs. On the flip side again, 10% isn't going to get the resale agent into the Forbes 500.
If both feel like they are getting the bad end of the deal - it's probably the right number.
My two cents. Of which my agent gets 10%
