We've rented our points for many years via Dave's. This year we used another company for the first time. (We submitted our points availability to both outfits at the same time and the other company found a renter first.) But unlike Dave's, presumably because it is a Canadian business, the other company has requested that we complete and return a 1099 Form. We make it a rule not to disclose our SS# unless absolutely necessary, and in timeshare transactions we've only disclosed it to a licensed escrow company when selling. (We've been asked for the info from newly purchased timeshares' owner services dept, but we've always confirmed that we could omit that info if we didn't finance the purchase, and we don't provide the info.)
The email from the other company says "Your submission is needed by December 31, 2015. We will be required to show 'Would Not Provide' in the social security box of your IRS Form 1099 if not received by this time."
Since we always report our rental profits on our tax returns, we're not concerned about issues on that end. But would having this "Would Not Provide" notation raise a flag for the IRS to audit us? We've never been audited before and would hate for this to be a trigger. Do we have anyone knowledgeable about this here?
I must say that I never considered this as an issue for using an U.S. rental intermediary. In hindsight, if I had known about this, I would have stuck with renting via Dave's and avoided this hassle. The slightly extra $ per point isn't worth the trouble for me.
The email from the other company says "Your submission is needed by December 31, 2015. We will be required to show 'Would Not Provide' in the social security box of your IRS Form 1099 if not received by this time."
Since we always report our rental profits on our tax returns, we're not concerned about issues on that end. But would having this "Would Not Provide" notation raise a flag for the IRS to audit us? We've never been audited before and would hate for this to be a trigger. Do we have anyone knowledgeable about this here?
I must say that I never considered this as an issue for using an U.S. rental intermediary. In hindsight, if I had known about this, I would have stuck with renting via Dave's and avoided this hassle. The slightly extra $ per point isn't worth the trouble for me.