Guess we should always keep in mind that for
DVC it is a business. Suppose we might accept that they will always lean to what they consider best for the business, but also need to respect the fact that they also have to keep the customers (DVC owners) happy.
One of the main things they will do in that regard is place restrictions on resale in order to create what might be considered a premium value on direct. I'm a resale owner, but have been solicited by DVC for a direct purchase. To this date I have not responded to a solicitation, but suppose that if I do I'd want to ask the sales person about the future value of the direct purchase. Why do they think it is in their favor to take restrictive actions against a direct owner should their family situation create a need to sell their direct DVC? That is certainly not in the favor of the direct owner. Their restriction action immediately devalues the direct ownership.
And please understand, I know all this is a balancing act. As a resale owner I was able to take advantage of their actions to devalue the resale purchase, but then must suffer the consequences of the cold shoulder, or elbow to the ribs, if I try to take advantage of certain DVC benefits. Must accept that in the DVC family a resale owner will still get the happy welcome home greeting, but face the cold shoulder in other ways (i.e. a resale home is not equal to a direct home). Must accept that as a resale owner you are actually 2nd class member of the family. If you can accept that, then there are financial benefits to becoming a 2nd class member.