Sure. Pull me into this debate.
Okay ~ more important things first. (Yes Sher, something IS more important than the great debate about edit-quette.)
Steph - great start. Strangely, as much as I post elsewhere, I really tend not to post too much on trip reports. But I am enjoying yours muchly.
Now, here are the actual "rules" as set forth in the Rulebook:
Rule 2: An edit is required for every post.
Rule 2.13.7: Upon failure to comply with Rule 2, said offender will be "flagged." The keeper of the flags will usually (exclusively, really) be Sheridac. It is in her sole descretion whether such flags shall be issued.
Rule 2.13.7.1: Appeal of decisions under Rule 2.13.7:
If any member wishes to appeal a flag issued under Rule 2.13.7, then s/he shall be required to do the following, in no particular order: beg, grovel, plead, compliment the thrower of the flags, complement the shoes of the thrower of the flags, complement the legs and feet contained within the shoes that you are complimenting being worn by the thrower of the flags, offer alcohol to the thrower of the flag who has gorgeous feet in gorgeous shoes, that you should complement.
As the keeper of the Rulebook, I have to say that the rule regarding edits does not specify whether such edits should be ONLY for the "Maelstrom" or for all posts. It is a Rulebook for "Maelstromers." So, I think the question then is, are you only a "Maelstromer" when posting on M2 (currently) or in all posting?
If you are in the camp that once a Maelstromer, always a Maelstromer, then I think the rulebook somewhat dictates edits ALWAYS.
If you are in the camp that Maelstroming should be somewhat confined to certain areas, like M2 and
perhaps threads started by other Maelstromers, then the question of whether edits are required is a little fuzzier. I point out that our origins are the Trip Report board. So, if there is to be an extension beyond M2 about where to edit, then I think the logical next place of invasion would be on the Trip Report Board.
BUT,and this is a big
BUT,
I also do not think that any of us wish to cause others to feel alienated or as outsiders,
SO, I think that as a policy, the flagging should be confined to M2, which is not to say that I think that there is anything stopping the enforcer from flagging THERE for infractions which may occur HERE.
That's my interpretation of the rules.
For those that are not familiar with this crazy bunch of Vikings, the debate about the flags is about whether some pithy edit should be attached to each post. In case you care. Which you probably don't. But, you should try it, it's FUN!