But being able to book 2 or 3 rides in advance,like the old FP+ system, for onsite guests would be awesome, even if we need to pay for it. We could work around our table service meals instead of having everything pop up and having to keep an eye on the phobe while we're trying to ejoy a bit of quieter time. And that should apply to ALL onsite guests, not just DVC. It is almost like Disney values the people at offsite cheap motels as much as their onsite guests when we're forced to get out up early just to book a ride or join a virtual queue. *** far as park reservations in general...I'm OK with that, as we always planned our table servioce meals in advance, which really is the same thing, as you have to choose a park to do that. Just be smarter about how you treat your onsite guests, Disney.
Agree 100%. Being able to reserve 3 rides was HUGE for my family, since we would often only have 3 or 4 rides we really care about per park. In this way, we were able to arrange to sleep in, know we were going to see the few rides we really needed to, grab our ADR and go back to the resort, and that was a day for us. We did not have to fight huge crowds. As you say, park reservations do not bother me since I had a plan anyway because I picked by ADR and my FP+. So my park reservations were a gimmie.
But back in the day I remember being frustrated when Disney started the good neighbor program. In fact, at the time I posted that I felt Disney was eroding the benefit of staying on site and that it was only going to get worse. It feels like they have continued on that path, and for those of us who enjoyed the benefits of staying on site as part of the argument for buying into DVC - I kinda feel a little slighted on that.
For those DVCers that are all talking jumping ship. Is it solely the loss of AP access? If one goes once a year for extended time, a 10dy really isn't more than AP. I can see those going 2-3 a year it really affects, but not the yearly.
I think that's what Disney is trying to figure out the sweet spot with DVCers too; offer APs vs encourage yearly visits instead and concentrate the spending and boost the per person spend in park to address overcrowding
Actually, the loss of AP's have not hit me. We bought them during the short window they were open and we maintain them - so for us, we still have ours. What is driving me from Disney are the choices the company is making in non park areas such as their programming and IP properties, the crowding at the parks (this is a big problem for me), erosion of benefits to staying on site, SOME park changes (Genie alone isn't enough, but it doesn't help when I compare it to FP+)...
Brand loyalty matters. They have significantly eroded my loyalty. I don’t feel valued as a dvc member, so that’s that.
This is what stresses it for me. I can deal with a lot of small negatives. I have been known many times on here as a Disney apologist, and I make no excuses. I have often said "give them time. Things go from good to bad, back to good", "it's cyclical", and things like that.
What I can't say enough is that it's about brand loyalty to me. If I love Disney and I love the company and I love everything Disney, then I am so proud to be an "exclusive member" of that company that I will put up with a lot I do not like. I can forgive
Genie+ and I can deal with crowds with the smart strategies I have had to use over the many years, and I can deal with some short term missing services. But that's because I AM A MEMBER OF
DISNEY VACATION CLUB. Not Marriott. Not Hilton. Not Joes Vacation Extravaganza. No, this is
DISNEY. The Big D. The Mouse House. The greatest showmanship company in the world.
But WHY do I feel that way? Why do I not feel that way about Sandles, which is certainly a good destination resort? It's because of the IP. It's the stories that I love and the characters that I treasure. I want to see and meet those people whose lives I care about (as fake and made up as they are), to interact with them and see their stories come to life.
The problem is that the latest IP - the latest stories - they are not exciting to me. I do not connect with these characters. WORSE, the characters I do connect with are being systematically destroyed and replaced by different visions. I do not understand why there can not be room for both the characters I love and new characters with new stories and new backgrounds. Walt famously said
“There's enough land here to hold all the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine." So, why then is there not enough room for both? Instead we have to change the backgrounds of existing characters into something that no longer resembles the ones I know.
I know I have gotten into an off topic rant here, but it's part of the package to me. If I do not care about the stories that Disney tells, then it's no longer important to feel a part of that culture. Know what I mean?