All professionals pay or borrow to put themseleves through school. Granted doctors go for longer, but still they know what they are getting into. I agree that doctors deserve to be paid a good salary, but I believe they already are. It is true that insurance pay doctors less than they bill for, but doctors also bill higher knowing that they will not get it.
I should also add that my doctor is in a large practice with several doctors. Overhead is shared amongst all doctors, so overhead is much lower than a one doctor operation.
I undestand that a doctor's office is a business and as such they should make a "fair" profit. The problem is that what they consider "fair" is not always what everyone else considers fair. IMHO, charging your patients a retainer fee is not the way to get more revenue. Doctors should band together and petition the insurance companies.
What I'm saying is that since Medicare/Medicaid is a government run program and the government issues the licenses to the doctors, the doctors should not have the right to refuse to take it. This does not mean that they should have to take every Medicare/Medicaid patient, but they should be required to take some.
Trust me, not everyone graduates college with potentially up to $200,000+ in student loans. You can't seriously believe physicians entering an undergrad program know exactly what they are getting into. And does that argument really justify forcing physicians to take significant pay cuts? Float that idea with an attorney and see how far it goes with him or her.
What difference does it make if doctors bill higher than they will collect? They are paid what the insurance determines they will be paid and that's it. Physicians have "banded together" in large practices BECAUSE of the overhead costs. People lose jobs in that scenario...office people...billing people. As far as physicians banding together, I think they call that the American Medical Association. You don't really think they're not trying to do something about malpractice premiums? Oh wait, there's the topic of lawyers again. No tort reform this year either.
I don't subscribe to the position that states issue physician licenses and, as such, should be able to mandate physicians to accept a given number or percentage of Medicare/Medicaid patients. Physicians pay biannully to renew those licenses; they aren't free either. Most patients are "grandfathered" into a practice. Oh sure, I suppose there are some physicians that would cut them from their clientele.
Aside from that, physicians are already engaged in the socialism of medicine since it is the government who makes the determination the percentage that they will "cut" Medicare reimbursement each year, just as the government decided that seniors are not eligible for SS increases either this year or next. Physicians are already forced by the government to accept lower reimbursements by the government.