Snape
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2010
- Messages
- 354
I'm betting that with the current management, if people stop going to Disney parks and resorts, all they will do is cut more corners.
I agree. I really don't think they care.
I'm betting that with the current management, if people stop going to Disney parks and resorts, all they will do is cut more corners.
This is what we've done. While we still buy park tickets, we stay offsite and refuse to give Disney the money until they fix some of the things that have drastically slipped.
We skipped disney this year and most of it has to do with price increases and quality slipping,also lack of new attractions.Las Vegas will be getting our vacation dollars and if disney doesn't improve it may be a few years till we come back.I must admit there will be alot of things I will miss! When we do go back I would venture to say disney will get a least one day less as we will go to universal for a day to see potter and alot of the other newer rides they have installed the last few years.If it is true what one poster said on here about disney quarterly profits, the company should be embarassed(assuming they are just for the magic kingdom.) If true they need to put some money back into the place and try to remedy the situation.Just my two cents!This is what we've done. While we still buy park tickets, we stay offsite and refuse to give Disney the money until they fix some of the things that have drastically slipped.
We skipped disney this year and most of it has to do with price increases and quality slipping,also lack of new attractions.Las Vegas will be getting our vacation dollars and if disney doesn't improve it may be a few years till we come back.I must admit there will be alot of things I will miss! When we do go back I would venture to say disney will get a least one day less as we will go to universal for a day to see potter and alot of the other newer rides they have installed the last few years.If it is true what one poster said on here about disney quarterly profits, the company should be embarassed(assuming they are just for the magic kingdom.) If true they need to put some money back into the place and try to remedy the situation.Just my two cents!
We go a couple times a year and have a good time.Comp rooms and a vast choice of food suit us to a tee.Staying at the luxor, kinda reminds me of the contempoary with an egyptian feel.Seen better rooms in vegas but they are livable.*
Hi! I haven't been to VEGAS since 04. I think though, you can get some great deals on hotels and food (buffets). It's always a fun place to visit. I highly recommend the Mandalay Bay and Bellagio resort, their both top notch!
I love this post!What ever you want to call it, greed or not investing in the business, apparently 3/4 of a billion dollars profit every quarter isn't enough for Disney. They continue to make cuts and changes that negatively affects the Disney that we had all loved for so many years.
Putting finance people in key corporate positions will change a company every time.
They need some dreamers to balance out the bean counters. Walt and Roy had their problems but they balanced each other out and built a business that people from all over the world fell in love with and that other companies admired.
Bill
What ever you want to call it, greed or not investing in the business, apparently 3/4 of a billion dollars profit every quarter isn't enough for Disney. They continue to make cuts and changes that negatively affects the Disney that we had all loved for so many years.
Putting finance people in key corporate positions will change a company every time.
They need some dreamers to balance out the bean counters. Walt and Roy had their problems but they balanced each other out and built a business that people from all over the world fell in love with and that other companies admired.
Bill
Precisely: Disney responds to what guests actually think overall, not what some guests on online forums try to imply that guests think overall. Disney, like all consumer service providers, care a great deal about how their customers perceive their offerings - the issue is that, despite all the doom-and-gloomers that abound online, customers perceive that the value of a Disney vacation has increased over time, not decreased.From what I see, there just aren't enough people who are dissatisfied enough to do that, and so it's unlikely that Disney will fix the things so many complain about.
I'm sorry but that assertion doesn't make sense. Disney invested a large amount of money to create a Disney-quality facility. I can understand being frustrated that it costs more than you'd like to pay - it's natural for consumers to wish they could pay less for things - but there is no notion by which the construction of this facility could be conceived as matter of reducing costs. If that was their concern, they'd stick with the old kennel or closed the kennel down entirely and tell guests with pets to leave them at a kennel in LBV or at home.The new kennel idea is expensive and inconvenient. NO thought to guests, just to reducing costs.
You shouldn't. You should only concern yourself with what they offer and whether it is worth purchasing or not. If it is worth it, then vacation at WDW. If it isn't worth it, then don't vacation there. ZeroMyHero hit on something last night: A rational person's appraisal of something should match their actions. If Disney wasn't worth what they were offering, then we wouldn't have all the threads clamoring about how hard it is to get this-or-that ADR; we wouldn't have any threads about "What happens when they close the Magic Kingdom due to capacity?" ... and so on.I would be more forgiving if they were having problems with profitability.
I think this really hits on a major aspect of this discussion: I think guests are just sad that Disney knows how much what they're offering is worth to guests, and that Disney is charging what their services are worth, instead of Disney operating as a charity to its guests.
I think that it's possible that people in general will put up with less value from Disney due to the fact that it is Disney. I don't necessarily agree that the public thinks that a Disney vacation has increased in value but is instead still valuable enough.Precisely: Disney responds to what guests actually think overall, not what some guests on online forums try to imply that guests think overall. Disney, like all consumer service providers, care a great deal about how their customers perceive their offerings - the issue is that, despite all the doom-and-gloomers that abound online, customers perceive that the value of a Disney vacation has increased over time, not decreased.
And a rather prejudicial way of wording it, at that. However, the contention is utterly self-contradictory. Maybe, as a frustrated consumer, it feels good to say something like that, but the fact that it is self-contradictory really highlights how little merit it has.Could not disagree more. Disney doesn't give a flying "poop" about the value of their product....only how much "$$$ they can separate from customers" <--direct quote from a first timer friend....who is also now a "last" timer.
Perhaps a little, but not a significant amount. Guests aren't idiots.I think that it's possible that people in general will put up with less value from Disney due to the fact that it is Disney.
Guests are paying more now than before, even adjusted for vacation. Again, guests are not idiots.I don't necessarily agree that the public thinks that a Disney vacation has increased in value but is instead still valuable enough.
I think that it's possible that people in general will put up with less value from Disney due to the fact that it is Disney. I don't necessarily agree that the public thinks that a Disney vacation has increased in value but is instead still valuable enough.
However this is just conjecture since I'm not aware of any hard numbers that indicate the truth.
I'm sorry but that assertion doesn't make sense. Disney invested a large amount of money to create a Disney-quality facility. I can understand being frustrated that it costs more than you'd like to pay - it's natural for consumers to wish they could pay less for things - but there is no notion by which the construction of this facility could be conceived as matter of reducing costs. If that was their concern, they'd stick with the old kennel or closed the kennel down entirely and tell guests with pets to leave them at a kennel in LBV or at home.
I think this really hits on a major aspect of this discussion: I think guests are just sad that Disney knows how much what they're offering is worth to guests, and that Disney is charging what their services are worth, instead of Disney operating as a charity to its guests.
You shouldn't. You should only concern yourself with what they offer and whether it is worth purchasing or not. If it is worth it, then vacation at WDW. If it isn't worth it, then don't vacation there. ZeroMyHero hit on something last night: A rational person's appraisal of something should match their actions. If Disney wasn't worth what they were offering, then we wouldn't have all the threads clamoring about how hard it is to get this-or-that ADR; we wouldn't have any threads about "What happens when they close the Magic Kingdom due to capacity?" ... and so on.
That boggles my mind.A turkey leg in 2005 cost: $4.99. Today, it's: $7.69.
Great post!! Well said**
Hi Bicker-
I think at the end of the day, you're missing the point. I've read through your many thoughtful posts laced with multi-syllable words and your own subjective conclusions. I take issue with some of your conclusions which you present as factual and "objective". They are not I assure you. They are as subjective as mine or many of the other folks who've responded to this point.
The OP was presented as an opinion and the question directed at asking members what they "think". With all due respect, you are in no position to tell any of these guests that they are wrong in their "opinions". Bottom line, each one of us has a God given right of "free will".
I don't need to be a Rhodes Scholar to know when service I receive is sub-par or when a corporation is taking advantage of it's customers. My basis is my years of experience visiting Disney. All of my own statements, such as the price increases and some less than good experiences with CM's, are real. Other members whom have posted offer similar experiences. You can paint it any way you like but at the end of the day, customers are becoming unhappy with the changes taking place at Disney World.
My DH works in the publishing industry and one facet of his industry, is advertising through 3rd Class Mail. A few years ago, the USPS decided to raise their rates on 3rd Class Mail with the obvious intention, of increasing their revenue by the 12% they raised costs. What they didn't take into consideration however, was the 50% loss in volume they would realize because of their gouging. Most 3rd class customers found other venues or simply went out of business because of it. The USPS later made a statement that "the economy" was responsible for the decrease in volume which at the time, was false as the economy was still growing. We all know now where the USPS stands in terms of profitability.
Point is, you can only increase prices so long and so much. Disney is following that same business model. They will continue to increase prices until they find the breaking point. A turkey leg in 2005 cost: $4.99. Today, it's: $7.69. The price of admission was approximately: $62.00. Today, it's: $82.00. Those increases are considerably above the rate of inflation and there are many more examples of how the prices are going up, inexplicably.
We love Disney and both my DH and I are doing well financially but at this rate, we will not be willing to patronize Disney the same as we have for years. It simply is getting too expensive.