DisneyMommyMichelle
A Maelstromer From Way Back...
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
- Messages
- 29,351
I wouldn't trade her for anything!
This is what sums it all up in the end isn't it

I wouldn't trade her for anything!



I remember when I only had 2 - now that I look back, it was so easy!golfgal said:We had our first then twins so we didn't have a choice to stop at 2. My personal observation is that families with 3 kids seem to have kids that get along better then families of 2 or 4. I don't know why but that is just what I have observed personally. We stopped at 3 because we didn't want 5 and since we had one set of fraternal twins the odds were higher of having another set so we stayed at 3.
. It has turned out to be a blessing. They are super close and they always have a playmate. Our older daughter gets along with them surprisingly well also. The only downside to having 3 kids is hotels and amusement parks. Some hotels only allow 4 people per room and most amusement park rides ie roller coasters only allow 2 at a time which means someone will always be riding by themselves. Luckily the twins are only 5 so we have a ways before they are riding roller coasters.
We never really had "the talk". We just said we'd stop when we wanted to. I always said I want to be done by the time I am 30...I'll have as many as I can till then...which for me will hopefully only be 2 more. Then I don't really want to be pregnant anymore after that. But that could change if we have 2 more and still no girls...I mean...can you imagine having 6 boys and NO girls...


so that's no problem.

thanks again!!!
To the point on occasion I have to remind her that *I'M* the mom and not her when she thinks she can also dole out discipline.

