"Connecting the dots" is not the same as proving something -- it is projecting assumptions. The difference between "4 years" and "more than 4 years" (which is all that I said) is pretty small... I cannot understand why you'd think that they're so far apart, just based on your "connecting the dots". As it is, my point stands: Most electronics has characteristics along the lines you've outlined, with regard to how they amortize warranty service and facilitate upgrades and such. My point was along the lines of this -- given that routers have no moving parts, and DVRs do, and that routers are relatively low-power devices while plasma displays are not; and given that both DVRs and televisions have far more complex protocols that apply to their inter-operability with the services they use -- that other electronic equipment is much more likely to hold to that 4 year timeframe, and fail, or fail to live up to evolving needs, much more consistently shortly after that 4 year timeframe, than routers will. So my point was more about how this problem is to be yet even more so expected with regard to other high-tech devices.
Given that I'm going to claim that you are actually substantially agreeing with me, despite your protestations to the contrary, I'll invite you to join in a related discussion to which, perhaps, your unique perspective might be quite an interesting addition. http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=showbiz&msg=4642.3 I think it would be interesting to see you have a discussion about this with the poster of message #3 in that thread, who said, "I am not used to replacing TVs that often, so to pay hundreds of dollars for something that will be obsolete in a few years makes very little sense. I may keep what I have now for as long as I can, given that new information."
Given that I'm going to claim that you are actually substantially agreeing with me, despite your protestations to the contrary, I'll invite you to join in a related discussion to which, perhaps, your unique perspective might be quite an interesting addition. http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=showbiz&msg=4642.3 I think it would be interesting to see you have a discussion about this with the poster of message #3 in that thread, who said, "I am not used to replacing TVs that often, so to pay hundreds of dollars for something that will be obsolete in a few years makes very little sense. I may keep what I have now for as long as I can, given that new information."




