But that's not the situation that
*I* was describing. My problem is standing still for long periods of time. Yes, the OP is concerned with people in a "cattle corral" type area and balance issues, but I'm talking about the physical act of standing still. The 40 minutes I spent in the single rider line at Rip Ride Rockit, for example, caused much more pain than spending 18 straight hours walking around IoA/USF/
HHN and not waiting in lines due to the Express Pass and lines for stuff I wanted to see not being long in general (except for RRR, and 40 min is by *FAR* the longest I've ever waited for a single rider line). A wheelchair would do nothing for me, because I wouldn't be able to roll it myself, and an
ECV is an expense that I can't afford. The Universal trip (as well as this upcoming Disney trip I'm taking with the two people with vision disabilities) are through our college, so there's not an option of "shortening the trip" by a night, and TS was *NEVER* a consideration for us (we're all on board the "eat cheap I'm getting kid's meals" plan). The trip is going to be $375 for the weekend, plus food. Adding $150 (40% of the cost of the trip itself ... and $150 is probably more than I would spend on food the entire weekend) for an ECV for 3 days is more than just "skipping a TS meal", and is considerably more than a "drop in the bucket for a Disney vacation". Even $80 for an offsite one for 3 days is more than just one TS meal. I would think a
DAS to allow me to sit on a bench near the loading platform for x amount of time equal to the queue wait time would be a reasonable accommodation, too. Apparently I have a *HUGE* misconception about the ADA.
The way I understand that, requesting a reasonable accommodation (
access to a bench) from Disney and being told "no, you have to rent one of our wheelchairs/EVCs" as similar to going to an airport and being told "you can't bring your
scooter in here, but you can rent one of our wheelchairs", or getting a hotel room and being charged extra because they only have certain rooms available that the service animal would be allowed in. Access to a bench would *NOT* "fundamentally alter the nature of the good, service, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation being offered or would result in an undue burden" to Disney.
Again, to me, that means that *ANY* "aid", if available, must be provided. Since a bench/seated waiting area would be readily available, I understand it to mean that the bench could not be denied, since in my situation it would be the best option.
I don't see being told that a wheelchair is the only option is any different from being provided the assisted listening devices or the verbal description devices to deaf/blind people. They aren't charged to rent them, they only pay a deposit that gets refunded at the end of the day. Same thing with providing a sign language interpreter; by your logic, if they needed one that badly, they should have either brought one with them or just dealt with not having one.
Found this on an ADA law Q&A section:
Again, from this, it seems to me if a wheelchair is the only option that they are willing to entertain, they shouldn't require me to pay for it.
I'm not trying to be obstinate about it, just trying to understand why Disney would say "my way (and you pay) or the highway", rather than making an accommodation that doesn't put any strain on their systems or cost anyone anything at all.