Edgehopper
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 341
Disney will increase prices to what the market can bear...part of the problem is that WDW is so huge that the addition of, say, five major rides, a huge expansion at most parks, gets a "Meh" from Disney fans.
What's changed in WDW attractions since 2005? Well,
* Expedition Everest opened.
* Monsters Inc. Laugh Floor opened.
* TSMM opened.
* American Idol Experience opened.
* Star Tours 2 opened.
And in the next few years we're adding Voyage of the Little Mermaid and the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train. That's 2 roller coasters, 2 E-ticket rides (TSMM and Star Tours 2), and 2 major shows (possibly 3 depending on what Storytime with Belle ends up looking like).
By comparison, in that time the only major new ride at Cedar Point was Maverick. For all we talk about Universal, other than WWoHP (which consisted of one fantastically innovative E-ticket, a reskinning of an already built coaster, a new kids coaster, and a lot of theming), the only other new recent rides at Universal are the Rip, Ride, Rock-It roller coaster and the Simpsons reskinning of Back to the Future.
So that doesn't seem quite so bad. Expanding is expensive and takes a lot of time, and Disney isn't quite as far behind as it seems.
What's changed in WDW attractions since 2005? Well,
* Expedition Everest opened.
* Monsters Inc. Laugh Floor opened.
* TSMM opened.
* American Idol Experience opened.
* Star Tours 2 opened.
And in the next few years we're adding Voyage of the Little Mermaid and the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train. That's 2 roller coasters, 2 E-ticket rides (TSMM and Star Tours 2), and 2 major shows (possibly 3 depending on what Storytime with Belle ends up looking like).
By comparison, in that time the only major new ride at Cedar Point was Maverick. For all we talk about Universal, other than WWoHP (which consisted of one fantastically innovative E-ticket, a reskinning of an already built coaster, a new kids coaster, and a lot of theming), the only other new recent rides at Universal are the Rip, Ride, Rock-It roller coaster and the Simpsons reskinning of Back to the Future.
So that doesn't seem quite so bad. Expanding is expensive and takes a lot of time, and Disney isn't quite as far behind as it seems.
Touche 
If you go back and re-read, I wasn't asking for "a line-item matrix comparing the value of Universal to WDW". I was asking for a simple comparison. Once someone decides that Disney too expensive and so they're headed off to Universal or wherever ... does that new destination give them the value they were seeking? Or do they find out that it's not greener over there after all? Doesn't seem like that taxing of a request. You could probably answer the question in fewer sentences than you have in most of your responses so far.
You are currently miffed at Disney for price increases or for not having things your kids like or for whatever reason. You posted that, and so of course you have lots of people telling you why they don't agree. What did you think was going to happen? In case you hadn't noticed, you've got plenty of people on this thread who agree with you too. 

But at what price Disney is "no longer worth it" varies, not according to income but interest. My parents had a much larger income than we do, with fewer kids, yet somehow they "never could afford" a Disney World vacation. When we get out there again, it'll be the third time in four years. They had a nicer (or at least newer) house and moved every couple of years; we get vacations. 