Long...
"For the first time in Disneys history, they will go 11 years between headliner additions to Walt Disney World (Expedition Everest in 2006, Avatar in 2017). The longest previous gap between E-Ticket attractions was 6 years (Horizons/Journey Into Imagination in 1983, MGM Studios and Wonders of Life in 1989)."
This is glaringly bias and could ruin the rest of the arguments. He calls Wonders of Life a headliner, and ignores all of New Fantasyland? Sorry. That would be 2006-2013/2014. NOT 11 years. New Fantasyland sometimes gets a bad rap because it was opened in stages rather than with a big bang, but it is STILL NEW and ADDS ATTRACTIONS (I would consider Mine Train at least on par with Body Wars). When I read this paragraph, the bias was so glaring that I figured any reader that might give this article serious note would possibly dismiss it because it begs the question of where else the numbers are cooked and data is ignored.
That said, hopefully Disney will see the benefits of adding major attractions. Carsland increased attendance somewhere around 21% last year in
Disneyland. That might include WDW as well, but I believe that is mostly just DL. Pretty obvious that a new Land riding on a major movie theme is popular with guests.
Avatar isn't as solid a prospect. It doesn't have the fan base... coming from a mom who spent WAY too much on ebay for silly Cars that are suddenly collector items, even though my 2 year old just wanted the characters from the original movie, not the sequel (originals weren't being sold in stores at the time - all Cars2). Yes, parents will spend for their kids. Did the same over Christmas for Star Wars stuff I couldn't find locally. Avatar? Yeah right. Doubt my kid is going to be clamoring for that, particularly because he likely won't see the movie for years, and even then, it will be an old flick. It's not a classic that is going to endear future generations for years to come. More like LaFou's Brew. No one really cares. Butterbeer? Definitely an icon of Harry Potter.
I don't pretend that MyMagic+ is for guests at all. It is a tracking device meant to help Disney cut costs on casting and streamline the parks. They did have to do something to get people to actually wear the things, so that's why this FP+, etc. was cooked up. Granted, for the family that sleeps in late, FP+ is a good thing. If Disney ever gets the Counter Service ordering aspect so it is widespread and works well, that would be a great feature. Order meals while in line for an attraction? Yes, please. Hopefully the interactive queue aspects of the Magicbands will get turned on sometime soon. Personally, these aren't big enough draws for me. We are going next month to Disney World for my son's first trip. After all the Magicband hoopla- mostly it being implemented with so many glitches- we have decided we will probably wait 4 more years to return to WDW. However, at that point our son will be 8, and honestly, if he is into Harry Potter, Universal will be getting a lot more of our money. Disney World does have a lot of inefficiencies in its use of cast members. If MyMagic+ can help Disney better manage its cast members and adjust for crowd flow, that could be a great money saver for them, especially if they can do it to improve guest experience and not detract from it, but it is not a real perk for guests.
MyMagic+ attempts to get visitors to pre-plan and commit to Disney. Disney knows from previous experience that pre-planners spend more at Disney and tend to spend more time there. It attempts to gather guest data to so Disney can optimize marketing and resources in the future, hopefully increasing revenue and decreasing costs. It is a theme park management system, and affects underlying elements of the experience more than the overt ones.
Unfortunately, FP+ with its limitations came as part of the package. If instead they introduced MM+ with unlimited FP and every ride was only a 10 minute wait for everyone, people would have been singing it's praises and planning trips for every year in the future instead of giving hate. I know such lines are an impossibility with capacity constraints, but it goes to show that most people are more unhappy with FP+ than they are MM+ (minus the GLITCHES!!!!). It's just that the 2 are lumped together and sometimes one is not differentiated from the other.
It's simple. Parents like to have their kids young kids watch Disney Movies. It's why Cinderella and The Little Mermaid are still popular. Parents also want their kids to like to read, and Harry Potter has done that in a way no other series has in the past, so it is likely to remain an institution. Star Wars is the same (an institution). New Fantasyland is filling the need of adding Belle and Ariel and a Princess Hall to the mix of MK. That's pretty enduring. Carsland did the same for DL. Both were needed updates as these shows proved to remain popular, and there wasn't a place for them really in the parks. Hopefully Disney will continue this vein in the future. Avatarland is an attempt to make AK into an evening park, and I think it is particularly angled at teenagers and adults. We will see. If it is cool and as beautiful as the movie, maybe it will be a smash hit. Or it could be a dud. Who knows.
Honestly, for the FP+ side of things, I am a touring plan user - a mashup of easywdw and touringplans using the things
I like, not someone else's list. I do plan in advance and make advanced touring plans, so pre-booking isn't a big deal to me. However, the limitations on FP over previous visits does feel very limiting, especially now with a young child in tow. I would MUCH rather pull a FP ticket and play/eat/shop where my child is not seeing the backs of the same people for a half hour to an hour than just get 3 chances at that and maybe have to scrap the rest of the day, depending on crowds and line sizes. I am not happy with the 3 limit and tiering. If I park hopped, then I would also want FP reservations for other parks available.
As for Disney getting more of my money with the system? It's really not. I have a budget for this vacation. Wanting a deluxe resort and Signature dinners means that I am spending 5 days there rather than 10. So per day spending is up, but Disney isn't really getting more of my money. In fact, they are getting less because I am paying for some other services outside of the park to make up for the inconveniences and long lines in the parks. Disney would get that money if I wasn't worried about FP limits.