figment_jii
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2006
- Messages
- 22,888
Yes, I'm not sick of Frozen (yet), but I'm also not a huge fan. I liked the movie well enough, but it wasn't my favorite Disney movie. I think I'd be less receptive to the Frozen elements if I hadn't just gone to DLR with a little girl that loves Frozen (and all things princesses), so I can imagine how it would look through her eyes. I remind myself to look at the Frozen elements through that view point, and it all seems much better.
I'm curious about the show at Fantasy Faire. If you had asked me two months ago, I would have said "meh", but I actually watched the Tangled and Beauty and the Beast shows for the first time and they were a lot more fun than I expected. It wasn't a faithful re-telling; it re-told the story, but with a decidedly comic/campy/almost-slap stick twist. I have hopes that they'll keep the comic element when they debut the Frozen show.
For Hollywood Land, I never really saw it as a cohesive land to start with. I agree that ToT thematically looks like it fits into the land based on the decor at the entrance. The Main Street looks thematically similar, but the side area (with Muppets, Monsters Inc) always just seems separate to me. Maybe it was supposed to look like the backlot area of a Hollywood studio? It just seemed like it was kind of a random assortment of attractions, shows, and buildings.
In terms of Star Wars land, I agree that Tomorrowland is a better fit. It'll be interesting to see what happens. Although, I'm not sure I love the idea of a land dedicated to Star Wars - one or two rides is good, but I'm not sure about a whole land (and I like Star Wars - mostly). In terms of a Frozen-land, I agree that Toontown's space would fit thematically better, but again, I'm kind of glad the major additions (and this point) are temporary. The stuff in Hollywoodland can be easily removed when the craze dies down (unlike the redo of Malestrom in Epcot, which will have Frozen influences for the foreseeable future - even after the craze dies down). So guess in the end, I'm glad that most of the major Frozen additions are concentrated in one area and easy to find or avoid, depending on one's point of view.
I'm curious about the show at Fantasy Faire. If you had asked me two months ago, I would have said "meh", but I actually watched the Tangled and Beauty and the Beast shows for the first time and they were a lot more fun than I expected. It wasn't a faithful re-telling; it re-told the story, but with a decidedly comic/campy/almost-slap stick twist. I have hopes that they'll keep the comic element when they debut the Frozen show.
For Hollywood Land, I never really saw it as a cohesive land to start with. I agree that ToT thematically looks like it fits into the land based on the decor at the entrance. The Main Street looks thematically similar, but the side area (with Muppets, Monsters Inc) always just seems separate to me. Maybe it was supposed to look like the backlot area of a Hollywood studio? It just seemed like it was kind of a random assortment of attractions, shows, and buildings.
In terms of Star Wars land, I agree that Tomorrowland is a better fit. It'll be interesting to see what happens. Although, I'm not sure I love the idea of a land dedicated to Star Wars - one or two rides is good, but I'm not sure about a whole land (and I like Star Wars - mostly). In terms of a Frozen-land, I agree that Toontown's space would fit thematically better, but again, I'm kind of glad the major additions (and this point) are temporary. The stuff in Hollywoodland can be easily removed when the craze dies down (unlike the redo of Malestrom in Epcot, which will have Frozen influences for the foreseeable future - even after the craze dies down). So guess in the end, I'm glad that most of the major Frozen additions are concentrated in one area and easy to find or avoid, depending on one's point of view.