bcrook
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 4,939
I spent 5 fun filled and relaxing days at the Grand California Resort wandering in and out of both parks and Downtown Disney.
I had a hopper.
I probably spent equal time in each park.
I think I entered Disneyland first 2 times and Disney California Adventure first three times.
I wanted to get in to DCA because of the Radiator Springs and TSMM (that may just be because I am a WDW regular and can't get over the short waits for this attraction). But I would also say I enjoyed the peaceful feeling in DCA in the morning and the breakfast options.
Disneyland had an annual attendance of 16.8 million for 2014 and DCA had 8.8 million.
That is hard to fathom why two parks so close together would have such a difference in attendance. I understand in the past that DCA was a bummer or incomplete or not worth second park price or whatever, but now it is fantastic.
I was thinking about a few explanations:
1. The attendance is almost the same - but people enter Disneyland first and hop over to DCA later at a rate of 2:1.
2. People spend three days at DLR and spend 2 at DL vs. 1 at DCA (I find that difficult to believe).
3. The locals don't buy hoppers and just go to DL and scoff at DCA.
Or I guess some combination. If I spent 100 days on site - I would think I would continue to skew towards DCA, and hop over to DL everyday to ride the Pirates. Dead Men Tell No Tales!
What do the DLR regulars think about this?
I had such a great time in DCA. I think it might have the best all around theming out of the 6 parks I have been to. It celebrates the state of California well. Epcot used to be the best with its Worlds Fair concept... until the demise of Future World. DAK could have - but I don't get Avatar Land. Disneyland is a MishMash of wonderfulness. MK - same thing. DHS - lost its identity, and a new one is on the way.
I had a hopper.
I probably spent equal time in each park.
I think I entered Disneyland first 2 times and Disney California Adventure first three times.
I wanted to get in to DCA because of the Radiator Springs and TSMM (that may just be because I am a WDW regular and can't get over the short waits for this attraction). But I would also say I enjoyed the peaceful feeling in DCA in the morning and the breakfast options.
Disneyland had an annual attendance of 16.8 million for 2014 and DCA had 8.8 million.
That is hard to fathom why two parks so close together would have such a difference in attendance. I understand in the past that DCA was a bummer or incomplete or not worth second park price or whatever, but now it is fantastic.
I was thinking about a few explanations:
1. The attendance is almost the same - but people enter Disneyland first and hop over to DCA later at a rate of 2:1.
2. People spend three days at DLR and spend 2 at DL vs. 1 at DCA (I find that difficult to believe).
3. The locals don't buy hoppers and just go to DL and scoff at DCA.
Or I guess some combination. If I spent 100 days on site - I would think I would continue to skew towards DCA, and hop over to DL everyday to ride the Pirates. Dead Men Tell No Tales!
What do the DLR regulars think about this?
I had such a great time in DCA. I think it might have the best all around theming out of the 6 parks I have been to. It celebrates the state of California well. Epcot used to be the best with its Worlds Fair concept... until the demise of Future World. DAK could have - but I don't get Avatar Land. Disneyland is a MishMash of wonderfulness. MK - same thing. DHS - lost its identity, and a new one is on the way.


