Moliphino
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 11,969
The article says PTA - so not really associated with any coverage the school system might have had, right?
From what I read, if the school had a license it would have applied.
The article says PTA - so not really associated with any coverage the school system might have had, right?
Our school makes the PTA get our own. I’m not sure if that’s our school’s rule or the license itself. We’ve never questioned it, they just told us to get it if we’re going to show movies.From what I read, if the school had a license it would have applied.
The article does mention "In Berkeley PTAs generally fund school enrichment programs and academic support positions."The article says PTA - so not really associated with any coverage the school system might have had, right?
Well - I don't see anywhere that this is being called a "fine" except here. I do understand the position of the licensing company, but it doesn't sound like they're trying to be punitive other than requesting to be paid for a standard licensing fee.The article does mention "In Berkeley PTAs generally fund school enrichment programs and academic support positions."
I looked up this elementary school (Emerson) and the PTA is heavily involved in the school. Looking into it their handbook for the 2019-2020 school year lists the PTA funded over $90k to supplement the school budget to pay for teachers and office staff for art classes, PE, bilingual classes, etc field trips, teacher classroom grants, etc.
If I had to guess this is really about the parents feeling like they are having to pay pay pay and they see this fine as ridiculous even though they are assumedly rightfully in the wrong because let's be honest if you raised $90K for one school year $250 is absolutely easy peasy at that point. $90K may have taken a lot of work and no one may want to have to set aside or get more money to pay the fine but still.
As an aside they have on their webpage for the elementary school a donation fund/spot to help pay for this fine..
Fine, fee, licensing fee whatever. They owe it regardless of the descriptor used IMO. But yeah I wasn't meaning the company is trying to punish them on top of the amount they owe.Well - I don't see anywhere that this is being called a "fine" except here. I do understand the position of the licensing company, but it doesn't sound like they're trying to be punitive other than requesting to be paid for a standard licensing fee.
As for these enrichment activities, there's always been controversy over them in this area, especially with the schools in Albany, California. That was really strange because of three elementary schools in the same district where each individual school was keeping its own volunteer raised funds. They had two schools where the demographics were more affluence as well as more stay at home parents who could devote more time to fundraising for enrichment programs. Then there was another where there were more two working parent families, more immigrants, lower overall income, and college student parents (UC Berkeley's UC Village housing complex for students with families is in Albany). That made things really interesting because of huge disparities. Eventually they came to an agreement to pool funding to fund programs for all three elementary schools.
https://sfpublicpress.org/news/2014...trict-levels-parent-fundraising-playing-field
Our school makes the PTA get our own. I’m not sure if that’s our school’s rule or the license itself. We’ve never questioned it, they just told us to get it if we’re going to show movies.
The article does mention "In Berkeley PTAs generally fund school enrichment programs and academic support positions."
I looked up this elementary school (Emerson) and the PTA is heavily involved in the school. Looking into it their handbook for the 2019-2020 school year lists the PTA funded over $90K to supplement the school budget to pay for teachers and office staff for art classes, PE, bilingual classes, etc field trips, teacher classroom grants, etc.
If I had to guess this is really about the parents feeling like they are having to pay pay pay and they see this fine as ridiculous even though they are assumedly rightfully in the wrong because let's be honest if you raised $90K, $250 is absolutely easy peasy at that point. $90K may have taken a lot of work and no one may want to have to set aside or get more money to pay the fine but still.
As an aside they have on their webpage for the elementary school a donation fund/spot to help pay for this fine..
But the PTA is not part of the actual school system, is it? In MA, it is an external entity that raises money to support the schools - they get to decide how to raise money and how to fund things, what things to fund. They are not controlled by the school committee or city budget, so would not be under the umbrella of the school district.
Until today, Disney had not publicly responded to the outcry. Bob Iger not only apologized for the incident but stated that he will make a personal donation toward their fundraising efforts.Who wants to hear an unbelievable story about how Disney is essentially fining Berkeley’s Emerson Elementary School PTA $250 while reaping millions of dollars through a corporate loophole that has decimated public schools across California?
Well again it's not Disney doing it, it's the company they have a contract with regarding licensing. Disney isn't going to drop the contract with them because it protects them overall.Perception is often more important than reality. Whether Disney was right or wrong doesn't matter as much as how it looked. Think of the children![]()
I think a better outcome for all would've been to offer the district free licensing for a year and help advise on uses to optimize fund raising efforts. Then hopefully the school sees that a fee investment could increase their PTA profits and licensing can go about its normal business.Well again it's not Disney doing it, it's the company they have a contract with regarding licensing. Disney isn't going to drop the contract with them because it protects them overall.
But yes PR has a lot of clout these days and it just makes them look nice. Let's be real though the school, PTA, and parents still trashed talk the heck out of Disney but I'm sure all is forgiven now that they don't have to truly pay the amount![]()
“We thank everyone who’s been so supportive,” she told Berkeleyside. “We’re certainly not going to turn down donations, but there are plenty of deserving schools throughout California. That clearly is the issue resonating with folks across the nation: why are schools struggling?”
Yes, it's a very small gesture from Bob Iger and really a great PR move overall.....having said that, I don't think Eisner would have done the same if he was still in charge, knowing the bad PR they had from similar incidents during his tenure.