Castle2Castle
Disney Runner
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 705
With a demonstrably poor understanding of business and economics to boot. As others have pointed out, you can't really look at the theme park prices and inflation like a gallon of milk. Ignoring supply and demand differences, a gallon of milk in 1971 and in 2015 remains one gallon of milk. Walt Disney World in 1971 was one park, but today it's four parks with an entirely different class of attractions. Bringing demand back into the picture, Orlando wasn't nearly the city then it is today, and all the theme parks there enjoy a larger, better transportation network bringing more guests from around the country and the world. Whatever the opinion of development under Iger, the changes since 1971 are pretty darn hard to miss.I read this article, and IMO, and I stress, this just my opinion, the writer is sharing his opinion from a anti-business attitude.
Setting 1971 comparisons aside, his middle class narrative wants to have its cake and eat it too. The middle class is shrinking and ticket prices are increasing. He reasons from this that the middle class is being priced out, in which case we should expect attendance to be going...up? Maybe because as much as he wants to only focus on and cite the highest possible prices for tickets and experiences, many (probably most) people aren't paying those rates; they're leveraging room and ticket discounts -- from Disney, AAA, other third party sources. VBOs today also provide a new alternative for families looking to reduce lodging expenses.
And to suggest other parks simply raise their prices so they don't look too cheap by comparison? You don't even need to understand much about business to grasp the dynamics of competitor pricing, businesses provide free lessons everyday in their advertisements. I've yet to see Southwest brag about offering the same price or higher than their competitors...