Not hard at all.
It depends on how you define value. from your post it seems like the dollar amount is your main determining factor. for me it's different.
For example for me it's food. I'd rather pay 10X's the price and be guaranteed a good meal then to get free dining and be served mediocre food. So for me free dining is absolutely the worst thing out there. Even if it's free, I hate lousy food. so I am getting less. I stay deluxe, I have no issue with the price but I do expect certain things for that price. I hate having a sub par room which I have had experience with at the world. Now I will tell the truth that all my complaints have always, always been rectified but once again I have had it often enough at the world where it's not a "one time" event. So yeah I do see it as 'getting Less".
So my description of "value" is not the same.
Pretty hard to find some thing else? Are you kidding. Sorry take the 500 dollars you pay at night at the GF and go to vegas. NO way can you compare the treatment you'd get at the Wynn, the Bellagio, the Venetian and say it's comparable. (Just my opinion). I'm comparing resort to resort, not cost of airfare.
So there are many ways to determine value. some it's the bottom line, some it's what you get for those dollars.
disclaimer: I am not saying what ever way you decide is the correct way only that there are many different ways. I just commented because you said it's hard to find comparable quality. IMO it's down right easy.
Value is the bang for your buck. Of course if you spend more, you'll get more. If you spend 10x more then me, you should expect better service. It's only reasonable and it makes sense.
But if my vacation fund is 2k, if I take that 2k and go to Disney, it's going to get me more then it gets me in Vegas. 2k gives me at Disney everything I need for the week, including dining. I don't get that at Vegas... Just airfare to Vegas costs me about $500 more then airfare to Orlando, and that is an extra $500 gone that I wouldn't have spent getting to Disney.
If I had a vacation where I could just keep hucking money out there for better experiences, then yes obviously you'll have a better experience then the person who's not spending 10 times more. But that's not value. That's you paying 10 times more and getting 10 times more. Even at Disney, if you pay 10 times more then somebody else, you'll have a way different experience in terms of quality. But if we're saying that we have a budget of X amount and I need to have a great experience and need to make it stretch, then Disney is one of the best experiences out there, especially for those that shop the deals, when it comes to vacations. 2k at Disney gets me way farther then 2k going to Vegas. I'm not saying you can't do Vegas on 2k, or that Vegas isn't worth going to on 2k, but you're going to take hits on quality on that 2k trip you wouldn't be with going to Disney. The 2k I invest in my vacation at Disney will get me a lot more then what I'll get at other places.
As far as the free dining being the end of the world as we know it, that's something I've never, ever bought into. 9 out of 10 times the complaints about the
DDP come from people who either don't know how to properly use the DDP, people who don't understand how the dining industry works as a whole, or, frankly, people who believe that any experience that includes the word "free" has now been cheapened and therefore must be not as good. Those who, by offering it for free, the allure of the service is now gone as it's available to be enjoyed by all and, therefore, the attractiveness in the exclusivity that comes with having something others don't doesn't exist to give people that boost of having more then the guy next to them.
In all the trips I've had, pre and post DDP, the only tangible changes I've seen that has occurred to the food and dining experience are made due to changing food trends, changing family/experience needs and expectations, and simple economics. Honestly, at this point, with as many amazing places as there are to eat, both on and off the DDP, whenever I hear that somebody had a bad dining experience or mediocre food and it's the fault of DDP or FD, my assumption is that they must have screwed up somewhere. I mean, honestly, it makes no sense to me whatsoever that somebody like Gordon Ramsay or Anthony Bordain can go to Disney with their families and declare specific places and dishes among the best in the country, and state the overall dining experience to be among the best in vacation and entertainment dining in the continental US, but there is a general sentiment among some on here that because they can't find Mickey's head on a pat of butter and Disney X place no longer serves (insert outdated dish/food prep method here), therefore the DDP and free dining has degraded the food experience to a degree where it's mediocre.
I mean really, Tom Colicchio goes to Disney with his family for Food and Wine religiously every year and raves about the food... Last trip he singled out Le Cellier, Jiko, and Teppan Edo, went to Twitter to rave at the food, but people here say that Le Cellier is like Outback? Jiko is no better or worse then any other specialty sit down? Teppan Edo is the same quality-wise Benihana? I don't understand how somebody who's so renowned for his palate and eye for food and has built a career off his culinary savvy can arrive at such a dramatically different conclusion then people here who think that dining at Disney has been ruined by FD. I mean, Gordon Ramsay can tell by taste the difference between a lobster from Canada and a Maine lobster, but Disney was able to hornswaggle him to thinking that the food at San Angel Inn was great and not of the same quality as Chilis? Makes NO sense.