It's nice they personally reached out to acknowledge they were screwing you.
Exactly!
It's nice they personally reached out to acknowledge they were screwing you.
Before I forget -- To WDWfan: The address is "WDW.Guest.Communications@disneyworld.com"
Thanks to all your responses. I most definitely will post a trip report. We leave a week from tomorrow
I am old fashioned. I do not look at Disney as I would look at other companies. I grew up with Disney. I remember watching the Mickey Mouse Club and Zorro on TV. Having said that; I do not believe myself to be naïve.
Disney is a huge corporation whose single purpose is to make money. But part of their business model (and also a huge reason for their success at least in the amusement parks division) depends upon their image. A large part of that image comes from building a reputation for great customer service. Their parks are pristine, their cast members well-trained, etc. They are not perfect, but one knows one is at Walt Disney World. The place just has a totally different feel to it. On some level -- it is magical. But it comes from their being faithful to the brand image they have built and maintained.
The problem that I experienced (canceling the EMH so abruptly) made me angry. I did not view this as an opportunity to get something from Disney to make up for my inconvenience. I saw this as a breach in their own philosophy and counter to their brand. I wanted them to fix the greater problem of the hurt they have done to their brand. Now granted, it is a small blemish in the big scheme of things, but they add up. From my point of view -- I wanted to help Disney keep the magic going. Losing that would be terrible to me.
I understood that my email would go through a lot of layers of bureaucracy, and I wanted to try to reach someone to make my case.
LOL that and the fact that I personally spend a lot of my money on WDW and Disney Cruises may have helped.
I believe that I reached my goal. I wanted to get the message to the powers that be that there is a cost (not insignificant) to abruptly shifting the EMH like they did. There is a core group of Disney fanatics that engender the positive vibes for their brand. These are the folks they messed with when then made their unfortunate shift in EMH. Also, their timing could not have been much worse -- they are in the middle of fielding a huge series of technical innovations. (and in truth -- they are doing a fairly good job of it).
When I got the apology -- I believe it was sincere. I also believe the explanation I got was accurate. I do not think they would have admitted to something so simple as a failure of internal communications flow (one side of the mouse talking to the other).
The bottom line, I guess, is that I simply did not want Disney to change away from their long-standing philosophy that has made them great. It would be a tragedy to me if there would ever come a time when there no longer was a Disney.
Sorry for the long-winded response.
It's nice they personally reached out to acknowledge they were screwing you.
very glad that Disney was able to fix things for you! That does restore faith!
Before I forget -- To WDWfan: The address is "WDW.Guest.Communications@disneyworld.com"
Thanks to all your responses. I most definitely will post a trip report. We leave a week from tomorrow
I am old fashioned. I do not look at Disney as I would look at other companies. I grew up with Disney. I remember watching the Mickey Mouse Club and Zorro on TV. Having said that; I do not believe myself to be naïve.
Disney is a huge corporation whose single purpose is to make money. But part of their business model (and also a huge reason for their success at least in the amusement parks division) depends upon their image. A large part of that image comes from building a reputation for great customer service. Their parks are pristine, their cast members well-trained, etc. They are not perfect, but one knows one is at Walt Disney World. The place just has a totally different feel to it. On some level -- it is magical. But it comes from their being faithful to the brand image they have built and maintained.
The problem that I experienced (canceling the EMH so abruptly) made me angry. I did not view this as an opportunity to get something from Disney to make up for my inconvenience. I saw this as a breach in their own philosophy and counter to their brand. I wanted them to fix the greater problem of the hurt they have done to their brand. Now granted, it is a small blemish in the big scheme of things, but they add up. From my point of view -- I wanted to help Disney keep the magic going. Losing that would be terrible to me.
I understood that my email would go through a lot of layers of bureaucracy, and I wanted to try to reach someone to make my case.
LOL that and the fact that I personally spend a lot of my money on WDW and Disney Cruises may have helped.
I believe that I reached my goal. I wanted to get the message to the powers that be that there is a cost (not insignificant) to abruptly shifting the EMH like they did. There is a core group of Disney fanatics that engender the positive vibes for their brand. These are the folks they messed with when then made their unfortunate shift in EMH. Also, their timing could not have been much worse -- they are in the middle of fielding a huge series of technical innovations. (and in truth -- they are doing a fairly good job of it).
When I got the apology -- I believe it was sincere. I also believe the explanation I got was accurate. I do not think they would have admitted to something so simple as a failure of internal communications flow (one side of the mouse talking to the other).
The bottom line, I guess, is that I simply did not want Disney to change away from their long-standing philosophy that has made them great. It would be a tragedy to me if there would ever come a time when there no longer was a Disney.
Sorry for the long-winded response.
Exactly
How did they fix it?
A rep apologized, which is nice. Most of us like an apology. But did they *fix* the EMHs?
I'd hate to take away the happiness the OP is feeling, but I just don't know how it's been fixed.
(and usually this sort of experience will cause a "canned" response to be transmitted to all reps so they don't stray from it, because they want it to be ONE company-wide response... one's hope is that they track all of those "canned" responses to see how many people wrote in about it, to see the impact in numbers)
It's nice they personally reached out to acknowledge they were screwing you.
They fixed it by giving her something extra, since they took something away.