Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 39,228
I own 3 of those. I think Marriott has upped the ante with the trust points situation, as that side grows the weeks only owners will suffer a reduction in options. How important it is depends on a lot of factors but for a larger owners such as myself, it would have been significant had I not been able to take advantage. However that option to concert to the points system exchange option (Destination points) is no longer available to anyone and doubtfully ever will be for resale owners or even participating owners who buy additional resale weeks.It's actually kind of a mixed bag with the other systems. I did a bunch of research to see what kind of things other timeshare systems have done (figuring DVC might follow suit).
- Hilton has no real resale restrictions at all. Everyone is in the same boat.
- Marriott has resale restrictions that don't really matter financially; they're just minor exchange and convenience features like DVC.
- Starwood has some serious and eye-popping restrictions on most of their resorts, basically completely blocking access to their internal reservation system for non-home resorts (though you can use external exchange companies like RCI). A few resorts are apparently grandfathered in to having only minor restrictions, again sort of similar to DVC. There is a way to get the restrictions lifted by buying more points/weeks direct.
- Wyndham has significant restrictions. Not sure if you can get them lifted.
- Bluegreen has significant restrictions. I believe you could get some or all of them lifted in the past, but some of those methods may not work any more.
I consider a "significant" restriction to be something that impacts your ability to book rooms in-system, i.e. the primary value of the timeshare. Things like giving booking or waitlist priority to direct buyers, or giving them extra booking time, or blocking non-home resorts via internal booking.
I think there's an indication that the more popular and valuable the brand is, the less egregious their resale restrictions are. If you have a big national brand to protect, you can't be seen to be unfair to your customers. And frankly, I find the idea of making certain features of membership non-transferrable to be fairly slimy, which may be why Hilton doesn't do it, and Marriott and Disney only have minor restrictions. No one would buy a house from a developer under the terms that you can't transfer certain features when you sell it, so I wish people would raise more of a stink about timeshare companies doing it.
For Wyndham and BG it's more that they have a VIP system and resale buyers are now excluded from that system. Jim and Brian can likely give a more authoritative answer for Wyndham but I don't believe there's any way to convert a resale holding to VIP status. For BG this is currently the case, there is not way to convert resale points or fixed weeks to qualified points that I am aware of.
From a DVC perspective, I'm very surprised they haven't created a VIP system based on # of points and qualified status but given they haven't so far, I think it's not very likely going forward. However, I do think we'll see some more resale restrictions at some point. I think DVC has missed out on a lot of possible retail sales by not enticing current members to buy new resorts and extending their current contract as part of the process.