DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/disney-bob-chapek-iger-nelson-peltz-timeline-explained-1235491910/

Jan 17, 2023 9:16am PST
BY Jennifer Maas
Disney Reveals Timeline of Bob Chapek’s Ousting, Iger’s Return and Nelson Peltz’s Board Attempt in Latest Proxy Filing
Disney published a detailed breakdown of the timeline of events that led to Bob Chapek’s exit as CEO, former CEO Bob Iger’s return to the position, and activist investor Nelson Peltz’s attempt to join the company’s board in a proxy filing Tuesday.

The timeline, which Disney released ahead of its upcoming meeting of shareholders, “details the significant contacts” between Disney and Peltz’s Trian Group beginning in July 2022 and running through Jan. 11. According to Disney’s recounting of events, last summer, Peltz met Chapek for lunch at Disneyland Paris last July, and a few days later followed up to inform Chapek of his interest in joining Disney’s board, even though at the time the Trian Group CEO was not a Disney investor.

Per Disney, Marvel Entertainment chairman Isaac Perlmutter is a Peltz supporter and has voiced that support since last July, when he told Chapek and Disney CFO Christine McCarthy, as well as Safra Catz, the chair of Disney’s audit committee, that appointing Peltz to the Disney board “would help Mr. Chapek counter recent headwinds he had faced, solidify his position as CEO, and preempt any other potential shareholder nominations of director nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting,” adding that, “without Mr. Peltz there, former executives including Mr. Iger, would be back at Disney.”

Though it does not support Peltz’s attempts to join the board or agree with his assessment of the company’s operations, Disney defends its engagement with other shareholders in the proxy statement by noting that it struck an agreement with Dan Loeb’s Third Point, which reinvested in Disney in August and quickly began lobbying for independent director candidates based on a thesis Disney deemed sound in comparison to Peltz’s “lack of a thesis” — in September.

As a result of Disney appointing Carolyn Everson to the board in September and agreeing to add her as a director nominee for the 2023 shareholders meeting, Disney states Loeb has agreed to a standstill through the 2024 meeting.

At the 2023 shareholders meeting, longtime Disney chairman Susan Arnold will be stepping down, per the company’s 15-year tenure limit. As of Jan. 11, she is set to be replaced by Nike executive chairman Mark Parker, effective following the meeting.

Per Disney, “In October and November, members of the Board met numerous times to discuss governance and leadership matters, including concerns that had been emerging about Mr. Chapek’s leadership and strategic vision and whether he should continue as CEO, as well as succession candidates for the Chairman role. The Board had approached Mark Parker, a member of the Board for seven years and the current Executive Chairman of NIKE, to ask him to consider taking the Chairman role, and those discussions were ongoing as was consideration of other potential candidates from the Board. The Board viewed Mr. Parker as highly qualified for the role because of his business acumen and experience as CEO of NIKE, which is built around creative talent and a brand experience, as is Disney; his expertise gained from building a highly successful direct-to-consumer business; and his successful transition from CEO to Executive Chairman several years earlier.”

Then came Disney’s fourth-quarter earnings call Nov. 8, an event that put Chapek’s leadership into question even more than it had been before, and, per Disney, “Afterward, Mr. Peltz called Mr. Chapek to inform him that the Trian Group had acquired a position in the Company totaling approximately $500 million, with the intent of increasing this position to up to $1 billion. Mr. Peltz subsequently called Mr. Chapek and informed him that the Trian Group intended to nominate a slate of nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting unless the Company agreed to add Mr. Peltz to the Board.”

Representatives for Peltz and Trian declined Variety‘s request for comment Tuesday, referring back to its own timeline of events in its preliminary proxy statement filed Jan. 12.

See Disney’s timeline in full, as laid out by Disney in its Tuesday proxy statement, below.

On July 11, 2022, Nelson Peltz, the Chief Executive Officer of Trian Management, met Bob Chapek, then the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, over lunch at the Disney Hotel New York – The Art of Marvel at Disneyland Paris.

On July 15, 2022, Mr. Peltz called Amy Chang, a member of the Board, to convey that he was supportive of Mr. Chapek, and believed he could be helpful to him if he joined the Board.

Also on July 15, 2022, Isaac Perlmutter, an employee and shareholder of the Company who currently serves as Chairman of Marvel Entertainment, and previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Marvel, called Mr. Chapek and Christine McCarthy, the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, to encourage consideration of Mr. Peltz as a director. Mr. Perlmutter also called Safra Catz, the Chair of the Company’s Audit Committee, to advocate for adding Mr. Peltz. Mr. Perlmutter said he and Mr. Peltz supported Mr. Chapek, and that adding Mr. Peltz to the Board would help Mr. Chapek counter recent headwinds he had faced, solidify his position as CEO, and preempt any other potential shareholder nominations of director nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting. He said without Mr. Peltz there, former executives including Mr. Iger, would be back at Disney.

On July 16, 2022, Mr. Peltz called Mr. Chapek to express his desire to join the Board. Mr. Peltz noted that he did not hold an investment in the Company. He said if he was added to the Board he would then make an investment in the Company. On the same day, Mr. Perlmutter and Mr. Peltz had an hour long conversation with Ms. Catz to advocate for Mr. Peltz to be added to the Board.

On July 18, 2022, Mr. Perlmutter called Horacio Gutierrez, Disney’s Senior Executive Vice President and General Counsel, to continue to advocate for Mr. Peltz to be added to the Board.

In August 2022, Dan Loeb, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Third Point, contacted Mr. Chapek and Ms. McCarthy and noted that Third Point had recently reinvested in Disney and shared his views of the Company’s strategy. In addition to engagement on the elements of his thesis, Mr. Loeb also offered suggestions of potential independent director candidates for consideration. In early August, Mr. Peltz also contacted Ms. McCarthy several times to reiterate his desire to join the Board, also noting they had served together on the Procter & Gamble board. Third Point made its investment thesis public in mid-August and continued to engage with Mr. Chapek and Ms. McCarthy as to potential independent director candidates.

On August 29, 2022, at a special meeting of the Board called for this purpose, the Board discussed the various approaches from Mr. Peltz, Mr. Perlmutter and Mr. Loeb, the thesis put forward by Third Point, the lack of a thesis put forward by Mr. Peltz and the status of the Board’s ongoing refreshment process and independent director search, which included consideration of potential candidates to succeed Susan Arnold, the current Chairman of the Board, who would reach the 15-year term limit for non-management directors under Disney’s Board tenure policy at the 2023 Annual Meeting. The Board determined to continue discussions with Third Point regarding potential independent director candidates and other matters.

On September 21, 2022, Mr. Chapek, Ms. McCarthy and Alexia Quadrani, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Investor Relations, met with Mr. Loeb and other Third Point executives at their offices in New York City to discuss his investment thesis.

On September 28-29, 2022, the Board discussed the status of discussions with Third Point and the ongoing Board refreshment process including in respect of potential successors to Ms. Arnold as Chairman.

On September 29, 2022, the Company appointed Carolyn Everson as a director, and following a productive engagement process, entered into a support agreement with Third Point, pursuant to which, in consideration of the Company’s appointment of Ms. Everson as a director and her inclusion as a director nominee for the 2023 Annual Meeting, Third Point agreed to customary standstill, voting and other provisions through the 2024 Annual Meeting.
On November 8, 2022, the Company conducted its full fiscal year and fourth quarter 2022 earnings call. Afterward, Mr. Peltz called Mr. Chapek to inform him that the Trian Group had acquired a position in the Company totaling approximately $500 million, with the intent of increasing this position to up to $1 billion. Mr. Peltz subsequently called Mr. Chapek and informed him that the Trian Group intended to nominate a slate of nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting unless the Company agreed to add Mr. Peltz to the Board.

On November 10, 2022, Mr. Perlmutter again reached out to Ms. Catz, Mr. Chapek, Ms. McCarthy and Mr. Gutierrez to advocate for Mr. Peltz to be added to the Board.

Following the Company’s earnings call, Mr. Peltz invited Mr. Chapek to have lunch with him in Palm Beach, Florida. On November 12, 2022, Mr. Chapek met separately in Palm Beach with each of Mr. Peltz and Mr. Perlmutter, and they continued their discussions to encourage the addition of Mr. Peltz to the Board and again expressed support for Mr. Chapek.

In the post-earnings call time period, Mr. Peltz also had several conversations with Ms. McCarthy in which he repeated that if he was not added to the Board, he would run a proxy contest. Ms. McCarthy offered to meet with Mr. Peltz in New York City on November 28, 2022, along with Mr. Gutierrez, but Mr. Peltz was not available then and asked for November 23, 2022.

On November 17, 2022, at a special meeting of the Board called for this purpose, the Board met to discuss the ongoing approaches from Mr. Perlmutter and Mr. Peltz. The Board determined that to ensure that the Board was able to guide the discussions with Mr. Peltz, from that point forward, Ms. McCarthy and Mr. Gutierrez would be the designated points of contact with Mr. Peltz and should both be involved in any further conversations with him.

On November 20, 2022, the Board made the decision to terminate Mr. Chapek and appoint Bob Iger as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board. The Company announced these changes on the evening of November 20, and following such announcement, it became public in various news articles that Mr. Peltz had amassed a stake of over $800 million in the Company, was seeking a seat on the Board and, according to some news outlets, did not support Mr. Iger’s return as CEO.

On November 23, 2022, at Mr. Peltz’s request, Mr. Iger, Ms. McCarthy and Mr. Gutierrez had a video meeting with Mr. Peltz, his son Matthew Peltz (“Mr. M. Peltz”), and Brian Schorr of the Trian Group. Mr. Peltz reiterated the Trian Group’s intention to mount a proxy contest if Mr. Peltz was not added to the Board. During the conversation, Mr. Iger and Ms. McCarthy inquired as to whether Mr. Peltz would be open to exploring a mutually acceptable independent director to add to the Board, and Mr. Peltz responded that he would only accept the addition of himself to the Board. Mr. Peltz did not provide any actionable ideas for Disney other than his Board candidacy. Mr. Iger told Mr. Peltz that this would ultimately be a Board decision and his request would be reviewed with the Board.

Following the conversation with Mr. Peltz, Mr. Gutierrez called Mr. Schorr to inform the Trian Group that there was a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board on November 30, 2022, and the Board would be discussing these matters. At such meeting, the Board discussed the engagement with Mr. Peltz and Mr. Perlmutter over the last five months and Mr. Peltz’s request to join the Board, concerns about introducing further disruption to Disney’s management team nine days into Mr. Iger’s return and the need to provide runway for Mr. Iger to address the challenges in the media business environment. The Board also focused on the fact that Mr. Peltz did not have relevant media or technology industry experience to offer that would further that key objective for the Company. The Board concluded not to offer Mr. Peltz a Board seat but to continue to explore whether there could be a mutually acceptable outcome as had been reached with Third Point. Mr. Gutierrez communicated the Board’s decision to Mr. Schorr.

On November 28, 2022, Mr. Iger held a “town hall” meeting with Disney employees where he articulated some of his key priorities, including re-organizing the Company to restore control, responsibility and accountability to the Company’s creative businesses; driving profitability in streaming; and reducing costs across the Company.

On December 1, 2022, a representative from the Trian Group delivered a letter to Mr. Gutierrez, informing Disney that the Trian Group intended to nominate Mr. Peltz (the “Trian Group Nominee”) for election as director to the Board at the 2023 Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by the Board. The notice also purported to nominate Mr. M. Peltz as an alternate nominee for election as director to the Board at the 2023 Annual Meeting in the event that the Trian Group Nominee is unable (due to death, disability, ineligibility or otherwise) or becomes unwilling to serve as a director.

On December 15, 2022, a representative from the Trian Group sent Mr. Gutierrez a demand letter pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) requesting that the Trian Group be provided certain information regarding the Company’s shareholder base.

On December 20, 2022, Mr. Gutierrez and Mr. Schorr spoke twice regarding various matters. During their conversation, Mr. Schorr complained that Mr. Peltz had not been invited to present to the Board. Mr. Gutierrez responded that the Trian Group had not made a request to present to the Board, but now that they had he would canvass the Board to make an arrangement. Mr. Gutierrez subsequently advised Mr. Schorr that the Board would convene after the holidays for a special Board meeting on January 10, 2023, to meet with Mr. Peltz and hear his presentation.

Also on December 20, 2022, Mr. Peltz and Mr. Iger spoke. Mr. Peltz informed Mr. Iger that if he was not given a Board seat he intended to mount a proxy fight that would challenge Mr. Iger’s legacy.

On December 22, 2022, legal counsel for the Company sent a response to legal counsel for the Trian Group acknowledging receipt of the Trian Group’s demand pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL and stating that the Company would comply with the requests in the demand letter once the Trian Group agreed to customary confidentiality and expense reimbursement arrangements.

On January 8, 2023, legal counsel for the Trian Group sent Mr. Gutierrez the materials that Mr. Peltz intended to present to the Board, which were transmitted to the Board.

On January 10, 2023, a joint meeting of the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee was held for Mr. Peltz, Mr. M. Peltz and Ryan Bunch of the Trian Group to deliver a presentation regarding the Trian Group’s assessment of Disney. The Trian Group representatives were in Burbank at Disney’s corporate offices with Mr. Iger, Ms. McCarthy, Mr. Gutierrez and other members of the executive leadership team and the other members of the Board participated by video.

Mr. Peltz opened the presentation and reviewed his history and experience with Heinz, DuPont and Procter & Gamble, his negative view of the acquisition of 21st Century Fox, and his overall assessment of Disney as underperforming under Mr. Iger’s leadership. Mr. M. Peltz then reviewed Disney’s financial performance under certain metrics that he asserted established Disney’s underperformance over Mr. Iger’s and the Board’s tenure. Mr. Bunch then reviewed certain corporate governance matters and provided observations on the Board’s decisions in such matters.

At the conclusion of the session, Mr. Peltz said he did not want to fire Mr. Iger but he did want to be in the Board room. Mr. Peltz re-iterated the Trian Group’s intention to initiate a proxy contest if Mr. Peltz was not added to the Board and that he wanted the Board’s answer by the next morning. Ms. Arnold thanked the Trian Group representatives for their presentation and said that the Board would discuss the content of their presentation and the request for Mr. Peltz to be added to the Board.

Following the departure of the Trian Group representatives, the Board (including all members of the Governance and Nominating Committee) discussed their presentation as well as Mr. Peltz’s candidacy, including in executive session with and without Mr. Iger present. After Mr. Iger left the meeting, the Governance and Nominating Committee and then the Board, by unanimous vote of all directors present, determined not to recommend Mr. Peltz and to instead recommend the Company’s existing directors as nominees to be included in the Board’s slate of director nominees for the 2023 Annual Meeting (other than Ms. Arnold who was ineligible to stand for re-election to the Board).

In deciding not to recommend Mr. Peltz, the directors considered a number of factors, including that despite months of engagement, Mr. Peltz had not, and the Trian Group representatives at the meeting had not, actually presented a single strategic idea for Disney, that their assessment of Disney seemed oblivious to the secular change that had been ongoing in the media industry, as well as the impact of the pandemic on each part of the Company’s business from production, to exhibition, to leisure travel. The Board also considered that Mr. Peltz’s experience, as recounted in his own presentation, was primarily in commodity consumer packaged goods businesses and not the media or technology sector nor any other industry that is driven by creative talent or creating unique customer experiences. The Board considered the many changes Mr. Iger was implementing, Mr. Iger’s deep knowledge of the media industry and track record of having transformed Disney through the acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm, the ongoing imperative to continue to realize the benefits of the Fox acquisition, whose prospects had been delayed by the pandemic impact, and concern about disruption to Mr. Iger and the management team at a crucial juncture for the Company if Mr. Peltz were added to the Board. Among the drivers for such concern was the combination of Mr. Peltz’s lack of media or technology industry experience coupled with his repeated focus in his presentation on successful approaches from businesses like Heinz, Procter & Gamble and DuPont which have little in common with Disney. In determining to recommend the nominees in the Board’s slate, the Board considered, among other factors, the ability of the prospective nominees to represent the interests of the shareholders of the Company, the extent to which the prospective nominees contribute to the range of talent, skill and expertise appropriate for the Board and the extent to which the prospective nominees help the Board reflect the diversity of the Company’s shareholders, employees, customers and guests and the communities in which it operates.

On January 11, 2023, Ms. Arnold and Mr. Gutierrez called Mr. Peltz to thank him again for his time and that of Mr. M. Peltz and Mr. Bunch the previous day and express that although the Board did not agree with his data sets utilized to assess Disney’s financial performance or his perspective on the Company, the Board wanted to find a path for constructive engagement that would avert a proxy contest. Ms. Arnold noted that Mr. Iger had only returned to the Company as Chief Executive Officer seven weeks earlier, there were significant changes occurring at the Company and that the Board believed the management team under Mr. Iger’s leadership should be afforded time to execute and was concerned about disrupting management from the task ahead with the addition of Mr. Peltz as a director at this time. Ms. Arnold said that in the hope of reaching a compromise, the Company would be prepared to enter into an agreement with Mr. Peltz that would offer him the opportunity to receive nonpublic information and meet with management and the Board quarterly to discuss strategy and other issues so that they could establish some mutual understanding about the Company’s business and strategy. Ms. Arnold noted such an arrangement had been successful between the investment firm ValueAct and a large public company she identified to Mr. Peltz. Ms. Arnold said each party could reassess the arrangement prior to the opening of the director nomination window for the 2024 Annual Meeting, at which time the Trian Group would be free to choose instead to mount a proxy contest. There was no reference or offer of a board observer seat and the word observer was never uttered by Ms. Arnold or Mr. Gutierrez. Mr. Peltz rejected this offer and said he would not be muzzled and that the Trian Group would be proceeding to a proxy contest immediately.

On January 11, 2023, the Company issued a press release announcing receipt of the Trian Group’s nomination and the Board’s recommendation that shareholders vote for the Company’s slate of director nominees. The press release also announced that Mark Parker would succeed Ms. Arnold as Chairman of the Board following the 2023 Annual Meeting. The Trian Group also issued a press release announcing the nomination of the Trian Group Nominee to the Board.”
 
So now we know that Peltz was kicking on the door just after the Chapek contract extension and way before he was fired. Automatically, Peltz's agitation gets on the list as to what caused Chapek's firing, I would think.
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/17/business/disney-proxy-battle.html

Disney Says Investor Seeking Board Seat ‘Does Not Understand’ Company
In a security filing, Disney was harshly critical of Nelson Peltz, saying he had “no strategy, no operating initiatives, no new ideas and no plan.”
By Brooks Barnes

Jan. 17, 2023, 1:47 p.m. ET

Robert A. Iger is coming out swinging.

Mr. Iger, chief executive of the Walt Disney Company, counterattacked the activist investor Nelson Peltz on Tuesday in a securities filing and aggressively defended his track record with acquisitions, especially the 2019 purchase of 21st Century Fox assets for $71.3 billion. Mr. Peltz started a proxy battle last week to put himself on the Disney board, saying that it was a “company in crisis” and urgently needed shaking up.

“Nelson Peltz does not understand Disney’s businesses and lacks the skills and experience to assist the board in delivering shareholder value in a rapidly shifting media ecosystem,” Disney said in the filing, noting that Mr. Peltz lacked a track record in media and technology. Disney added that, in conversations with its board, Mr. Peltz had “no strategy, no operating initiatives, no new ideas and no plan.”

Trian Partners, the investment firm led by Mr. Peltz, declined to comment. Trian has taken a roughly $900 million stake in Disney, and has said it may increase its position further.

Mr. Iger was rehired as Disney’s chief executive in November after the ouster of Bob Chapek, who had faltered on various fronts. In a separate securities filing on Tuesday, Disney disclosed that Mr. Chapek received a severance package valued at $20.4 million. His compensation for Disney’s 2022 fiscal year, which ended in September, totaled $24.2 million, a 26 percent decline from the previous year.

Proxy battles are old hat for Mr. Peltz. He has waged successful ones against Procter & Gamble and Heinz. He lost one against DuPont. Disney has not faced a sustained shareholder battle since 2004, when Roy E. Disney, a nephew of Walt Disney, led a successful drive to oust Michael D. Eisner as Disney’s chief executive.

Notably, Mr. Peltz has an ally on the inside of Disney: Ike Perlmutter, 80, the irascible chairman of Marvel Entertainment and a significant Disney shareholder in his own right. Mr. Peltz and Mr. Perlmutter are longtime friends. In a separate filing on Tuesday, Disney said that Mr. Perlmutter contacted Disney board members and senior executives six times between August and November to push for Mr. Peltz to join the board. “He said without Mr. Peltz there, former executives including Mr. Iger, would be back at Disney,” the filing said of Mr. Perlmutter.

Mr. Perlmutter’s job at Disney involves consumer products. He used to oversee Marvel’s movies, but Mr. Iger took away that part of his portfolio in 2015. At the time, Mr. Perlmutter and Kevin Feige, president of Marvel Studios, were locking horns, in part over Mr. Feige’s plan to add diversity to the Marvel Cinematic Universe with films like “Black Panther” and “Captain Marvel.” Mr. Perlmutter ceded oversight of Marvel television shows in 2019.

Mr. Peltz, who is known for intensely focusing on costs, has said he wants Disney to revamp its streaming business, refocus on profit growth, reinstate its dividend and clean up the company’s messy succession planning. In its filing, Disney pointed out that it was already doing most of these things. For instance, Mr. Iger, who served as Disney’s chief executive from 2005 to 2020, almost instantly began restructuring Disney’s streaming business when he returned last year. One change involves prioritizing profit over subscriber growth.

Before he left, Mr. Chapek announced that Disney would “look for every avenue of operations and labor to find savings.” That initiative, though delayed by the upheaval atop Disney, is continuing and expected to include layoffs. One person working on the cost-cutting program at Disney described it as “deep.”

Last week, Disney announced that Mark G. Parker, the executive chairman of Nike, would become Disney’s chairman after the company’s annual meeting of shareholders, replacing Susan Arnold. (Disney has not scheduled its annual meeting, which will be held virtually.) Disney said that Mr. Parker would also lead a newly created committee for succession planning, which will review internal and external C.E.O. candidates.

Mr. Peltz, 80, has repeatedly criticized Mr. Iger, 71, for orchestrating Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox assets. That purchase, along with the pandemic, loaded Disney with some $45 billion in debt. Mr. Peltz has said that Disney drastically overpaid, a claim that has become central to his push for a board seat.

Disney on Tuesday said the 21st Century Fox assets have played a “critical” role in helping the company transition to streaming. Disney+ was an out-of-the-gate success, in part because it offered “The Simpsons,” which came as part of the Fox deal. The acquisition also brought highly regarded executives — including Dana Walden, who is now Disney’s entertainment television chief — into the Disney fold.

During his previous tenure as chief executive, Mr. Iger expanded Disney’s market capitalization to $231 billion from $49 billion and delivered shareholder returns that far outpaced growth in the S&P 500. Mr. Peltz has described Disney’s performance as lacking under Mr. Iger.

In one of its filings, Disney described repeated interactions with Mr. Peltz and other Trian executives, starting in July 2022. Ultimately, the Disney board on Jan. 10 voted against recommending to shareholders that Mr. Peltz receive a seat. The vote was unanimous; Mr. Iger was not present.

In coming to that decision, the board cited concern about “disruption to Mr. Iger and the management team at a crucial juncture.” The board also focused on “Mr. Peltz’s lack of media or technology industry experience coupled with his repeated focus in his presentation on successful approaches from businesses like Heinz, Procter & Gamble and DuPont, which have little in common with Disney.”

Lauren Hirsch contributed reporting.
 
I'm not necesarily sure I want this guy to get a seat on the board, but I also know that I don't want most of the current board to be retained. Even if Peltz is just lighting a fire so to speak, that's probably a good thing. I hope it all shakes out in a good way.
 
Lookie here!!!
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lookie here

https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/investor-relations/

Beginning in fiscalhttps://thewaltdisneycompany.com/investor-relations/ 2021, MVL Productions LLC, a subsidiary of the Company, contracted with a company wholly owned by Mr. Chapek’s son, Brian Chapek (“Mr. B. Chapek”), for Mr. B. Chapek’s exclusive services for a three-year period. The contract provides for Mr. B. Chapek to receive an annual base payment of $322,000 in fiscal 2021, $342,000 in fiscal 2022 and $367,000 in fiscal 2023. These amounts are inclusive of a payment in lieu of benefits. Additionally, Mr. B. Chapek will receive a $200,000 fee for each film on which he serves as lead producer and an additional bonus calculated by a predetermined formula based on the worldwide box office of films on which he works, consistent with a range and structure typical of producer deals at Walt Disney Studios. For fiscal 2022, Mr. B. Chapek received his $342,000 base payment plus $40,000, 20% of his producer fee. In fiscal 2023, Mr. B. Chapek will receive an additional bonus of $31,000 pursuant to the terms of his contract. This relationship was reviewed and approved in fiscal 2022 by the Governance and Nominating Committee under the Related Person Transaction Approval Policy.

In fiscal 2022, Daniel McCormick, son of Christine McCarthy, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, was employed as Senior Manager-Research in the General Entertainment Content business. For fiscal 2022, Mr. McCormick’s base salary was $64,466 and his benefits were approximately $4,904, each prorated for the period of fiscal 2022 that he was employed by the Company (April 4, 2022 to October 1, 2022), and his bonus was $24,300. On an annualized basis, his fiscal 2022 base salary would have been $130,000, his benefits would have been approximately $10,626 and his target bonus would be $19,500. Mr. McCormick was paid an amount and his compensation was structured the same as similarly situated employees. This relationship was reviewed and approved in fiscal 2022 by the Governance and Nominating Committee under the Related Person Transaction Approval Policy.
 
I'm confused by the whole Perlmutter thing - he had a really active role in supporting Peltz. Why? Are they old friends? Was it some kind of power play on his part? And why didn't the board tell him to back off, if they wanted no part of Peltz? And why do they put his prominent role in all this, for all to see in the proxy? The palace intrigue is beyond wild! We need Disney Wars 2 out ASAP!
 
I'm confused by the whole Perlmutter thing - he had a really active role in supporting Peltz. Why? Are they old friends? Was it some kind of power play on his part? And why didn't the board tell him to back off, if they wanted no part of Peltz? And why do they put his prominent role in all this, for all to see in the proxy? The palace intrigue is beyond wild! We need Disney Wars 2 out ASAP!

They probably want to get rid or Perlmutter too - they should! What he's done to Marvel Comics is nothing short of tragic (the MCU is unrealted as Feige wrested control of that a while back and refused to report to Ike). They need to get rid of him and clean house at Marvel - big time!
 
They probably want to get rid or Perlmutter too - they should! What he's done to Marvel Comics is nothing short of tragic (the MCU is unrealted as Feige wrested control of that a while back and refused to report to Ike). They need to get rid of him and clean house at Marvel - big time!
I was wondering why you hardly hear his name anymore, i did not realize they divided Marvel up like that and assumed he was still associated with the success of the MCU. Now it is beginning to make sense, especially if Staggs is on the shortlist of successors.
 
Behind Disney’s Activist Investor Battle: A Marvel Mogul’s Revenge Play

In 2004, Roy Disney — Walt’s nephew — summoned Disney shareholders to the company’s annual meeting, asking them to oust then-chairman and CEO Michael Eisner, who had been running the place for 20 years. Roy had Walt’s face and his “Save Disney” movement brought emotional Disney-loving individual shareholders of all ages to chilly Philadelphia, some leaning on canes and others with babies in strollers. After a stunning 43 percent voted against re-electing Eisner to the board, a new chairman was named immediately and Eisner, despite vowing to remain as CEO until the end of his contract in 2006, departed in 2005.

At age 80, Nelson Peltz is old enough to remember one of the most successful shareholder revolts in corporate history. Presumably he also knows that he is no Roy Disney and CEO Bob Iger, back on the job only since November 21, is nothing like the increasingly imperious and isolated Michael Eisner of 2004.

But together he and his friend Ike Perlmutter, the former Marvel Entertainment CEO who has some scores to settle with Iger dating back to 2015, can represent a tenacious, expensive and distracting problem for Iger and the Disney board at a time when the entertainment company faces the same massive challenges affecting other legacy entertainment companies. The development adds pressure as the company faces a two-year ticking clock to find a successor for Iger, an effort led by Disney’s new chairman, Nike exec Mark Parker. It may also restrict Iger’s ability to maneuver as he might have wanted.

At this point, Peltz’s demands are far more modest than the dramatic changing of the guard sought by Roy Disney — the man is just asking for a board seat. But Disney is putting up stiff resistance. Peltz is raising some valid questions: Aside from the succession problem, for example, it’s stating the obvious to say that streaming costs have to be reined in. But Iger also has some cards to play, aside from his reputation as one of the best executives in business. He’s already moved to respond to the sense that Disney (under ousted CEO Bob Chapek) was price-gouging at the theme parks. Avatar: The Way of Water is still rolling — just the kind of megahit that can drive many aspects of Disney business and there are more sequels ahead. And China just agreed to give valuable release dates for Marvel movies generally. (Not only are we extremely unlikely to see any Chinese villains but presumably the talent will be well-schooled to watch their words.)

Peltz could hardly have intended his challenge to come at a time when Disney fans are still rejoicing in Iger’s return. He started chatting with Chapek in Paris last July and maintained a dialogue in the ensuing months.

It was also in July that Perlmutter began lobbying for his pal, calling Chapek, Disney CFO Christine McCarthy, and Disney board member Safra Catz less than a week after Peltz dined with Chapek in Paris.

At the time Peltz approached Chapek, he was dealing with a CEO who had been absolutely convinced just a month earlier that he was about to face execution by the Disney board. (Instead a divided board agreed to extend his contract, though it was backdated giving him less than a three-year term. The board then presented this result as “unanimous.”) It’s understandable that, at the time, Chapek might have felt that he could use a friend or two and that seemed to be on offer. “Mr. Perlmutter said he and Mr. Peltz supported Mr. Chapek, and that adding Mr. Peltz to the Board would help Mr. Chapek counter recent headwinds he had faced, solidify his position as CEO, and preempt any other potential shareholder nominations of director nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting,” Disney wrote in its preliminary proxy filing Jan. 17. “He said without Mr. Peltz there, former executives including Mr. Iger, would be back at Disney.”

Peltz is more known for targeting Blue Chip companies like consumer-product giant Procter & Gamble, and the Wendy’s fast-food chain. But of course his friend Perlmutter was very familiar with Disney — had in fact been its largest individual shareholder. Recall that the penny-pinching, gun-toting Perlmutter seized control of Marvel in 1997 and sold it to Disney in 2009. He remained as Marvel Entertainment’s CEO but in 2015, Iger decreed that Kevin Feige, then running Marvel films, would no longer report to Perlmutter but to then-film studio chief Alan Horn. In his memoir, Iger wrote that Perlmutter had stood in the way of Marvel’s first films with Black and female leads. “I called Ike and told him to tell his team to stop putting up roadblocks and ordered that we put both Black Panther and Captain Marvel into production,” Iger wrote. Feige sealed his control over Marvel when he took on responsibility for television, animation and print editorial operations in October 2019.

….

Stressing the secular change in the business is likely to carry weight on Wall Street. In fact, analyst Rich Greenfield had made that point using some of the same language even before the most recent Disney filing. He noted that Disney is hardly alone in facing strong headwinds and that Peltz had entirely neglected that point in his criticisms of the company. “There are major secular challenges facing this entire sector,” Greenfield said. Given that, “it just feels like Peltz doesn’t understand media in 2023.”
 
Last edited:
I was wondering why you hardly hear his name anymore, i did not realize they divided Marvel up like that and assumed he was still associated with the success of the MCU. Now it is beginning to make sense, especially if Staggs is on the shortlist of successors.

Oh yeah - they got into it over the Marvel TV shows (pre-Disney+). Kevin did not want to be beholden to the things they were doing (granted some were good but still). Ike is also known for being very stubborn and spiteful. When they didn't have rights to X-Men and Fantastic Four he made them verboten to be on any art around the office - it all had to come down and the comics were marginalized in the line. Kevin jsut didn't want to deal with his nonsense, so he went to Iger and Iger had him reporting directly to Alan Horn - it would have been that or lose him. Ike wouldn't have cared. Considering what's become of the comics, I wouldn't be sorry to see him go.
 
Behind Disney’s Activist Investor Battle: A Marvel Mogul’s Revenge Play

In 2004, Roy Disney — Walt’s nephew — summoned Disney shareholders to the company’s annual meeting, asking them to oust then-chairman and CEO Michael Eisner, who had been running the place for 20 years. Roy had Walt’s face and his “Save Disney” movement brought emotional Disney-loving individual shareholders of all ages to chilly Philadelphia, some leaning on canes and others with babies in strollers. After a stunning 43 percent voted against re-electing Eisner to the board, a new chairman was named immediately and Eisner, despite vowing to remain as CEO until the end of his contract in 2006, departed in 2005.

At age 80, Nelson Peltz is old enough to remember one of the most successful shareholder revolts in corporate history. Presumably he also knows that he is no Roy Disney and CEO Bob Iger, back on the job only since November 21, is nothing like the increasingly imperious and isolated Michael Eisner of 2004.

But together he and his friend Ike Perlmutter, the former Marvel Entertainment CEO who has some scores to settle with Iger dating back to 2015, can represent a tenacious, expensive and distracting problem for Iger and the Disney board at a time when the entertainment company faces the same massive challenges affecting other legacy entertainment companies. The development adds pressure as the company faces a two-year ticking clock to find a successor for Iger, an effort led by Disney’s new chairman, Nike exec Mark Parker. It may also restrict Iger’s ability to maneuver as he might have wanted.

At this point, Peltz’s demands are far more modest than the dramatic changing of the guard sought by Roy Disney — the man is just asking for a board seat. But Disney is putting up stiff resistance. Peltz is raising some valid questions: Aside from the succession problem, for example, it’s stating the obvious to say that streaming costs have to be reined in. But Iger also has some cards to play, aside from his reputation as one of the best executives in business. He’s already moved to respond to the sense that Disney (under ousted CEO Bob Chapek) was price-gouging at the theme parks. Avatar: The Way of Water is still rolling — just the kind of megahit that can drive many aspects of Disney business and there are more sequels ahead. And China just agreed to give valuable release dates for Marvel movies generally. (Not only are we extremely unlikely to see any Chinese villains but presumably the talent will be well-schooled to watch their words.)

Peltz could hardly have intended his challenge to come at a time when Disney fans are still rejoicing in Iger’s return. He started chatting with Chapek in Paris last July and maintained a dialogue in the ensuing months.

It was also in July that Perlmutter began lobbying for his pal, calling Chapek, Disney CFO Christine McCarthy, and Disney board member Safra Catz less than a week after Peltz dined with Chapek in Paris.

At the time Peltz approached Chapek, he was dealing with a CEO who had been absolutely convinced just a month earlier that he was about to face execution by the Disney board. (Instead a divided board agreed to extend his contract, though it was backdated giving him less than a three-year term. The board then presented this result as “unanimous.”) It’s understandable that, at the time, Chapek might have felt that he could use a friend or two and that seemed to be on offer. “Mr. Perlmutter said he and Mr. Peltz supported Mr. Chapek, and that adding Mr. Peltz to the Board would help Mr. Chapek counter recent headwinds he had faced, solidify his position as CEO, and preempt any other potential shareholder nominations of director nominees at the 2023 Annual Meeting,” Disney wrote in its preliminary proxy filing Jan. 17. “He said without Mr. Peltz there, former executives including Mr. Iger, would be back at Disney.”

Peltz is more known for targeting Blue Chip companies like consumer-product giant Procter & Gamble, and the Wendy’s fast-food chain. But of course his friend Perlmutter was very familiar with Disney — had in fact been its largest individual shareholder. Recall that the penny-pinching, gun-toting Perlmutter seized control of Marvel in 1997 and sold it to Disney in 2009. He remained as Marvel Entertainment’s CEO but in 2015, Iger decreed that Kevin Feige, then running Marvel films, would no longer report to Perlmutter but to then-film studio chief Alan Horn. In his memoir, Iger wrote that Perlmutter had stood in the way of Marvel’s first films with Black and female leads. “I called Ike and told him to tell his team to stop putting up roadblocks and ordered that we put both Black Panther and Captain Marvel into production,” Iger wrote. Feige sealed his control over Marvel when he took on responsibility for television, animation and print editorial operations in October 2019.

….

Stressing the secular change in the business is likely to carry weight on Wall Street. In fact, analyst Rich Greenfield had made that point using some of the same language even before the most recent Disney filing. He noted that Disney is hardly alone in facing strong headwinds and that Peltz had entirely neglected that point in his criticisms of the company. “There are major secular challenges facing this entire sector,” Greenfield said. Given that, “it just feels like Peltz doesn’t understand media in 2023.”
Wow, our little thread has been a step ahead on a lot of this!

Not sure why they haven't just moved Perlmutter out at this point. Does he have some ironclad contract?
 
Wow, our little thread has been a step ahead on a lot of this!

Not sure why they haven't just moved Perlmutter out at this point. Does he have some ironclad contract?

My understanding is that he does. He was an owner of ToyBiz when it bought Marvel and survided the bankruptcy and the sale to Disney. He somehow has the juice to stay in his position despite the many failures of Marvel Comics.
 
https://deadline.com/2023/01/avatar...a-global-international-box-office-1235222402/

‘Avatar: The Way Of Water’ Tops $1.9B Global; Will Pass ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’ Today To Become No. 6 Movie Ever Worldwide – International Box Office
By Nancy Tartaglione
International Box Office Editor/Senior Contributor
January 17, 2023 9:55am PST

UPDATED, Tuesday AM: With Monday’s grosses included, James Cameron’s Avatar: The Way of Water has topped $1.9 billion globally and is on its way to a new milestone through today when it will become the sixth-biggest movie ever worldwide.

As we reported Sunday (see below), when Way of Water jumps into the No. 6 slot, it will have overtaken Spider-Man: No Way Home. Through Monday, Way of Water has grossed $1,916.2M globally. Now, there has been some confusion over the final No Way Home worldwide total, but we have confirmed with Sony it is indeed $1.921B (whereas some charts have it at $1,916.3M) — either way, Avatar 2 will swim past No Way Home (which, it should be noted, did not release in China) when today’s figures will be tallied.

Way of Water picked up another $9.5M overseas on Monday, lifting the offshore cume through yesterday to $1,344.6M. The 20th Century Studios/Disney sequel currently stands as the No. 5 biggest movie of all time at the international box office.

The Top 5 markets through Monday are: China ($214.5M), France ($122.4M), Germany ($107.7M), Korea ($93.1M) and the UK ($77.2M).
 
https://deadline.com/2023/01/avatar...a-global-international-box-office-1235222402/

‘Avatar: The Way Of Water’ Tops $1.9B Global; Will Pass ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’ Today To Become No. 6 Movie Ever Worldwide – International Box Office
By Nancy Tartaglione
International Box Office Editor/Senior Contributor
January 17, 2023 9:55am PST

UPDATED, Tuesday AM: With Monday’s grosses included, James Cameron’s Avatar: The Way of Water has topped $1.9 billion globally and is on its way to a new milestone through today when it will become the sixth-biggest movie ever worldwide.

As we reported Sunday (see below), when Way of Water jumps into the No. 6 slot, it will have overtaken Spider-Man: No Way Home. Through Monday, Way of Water has grossed $1,916.2M globally. Now, there has been some confusion over the final No Way Home worldwide total, but we have confirmed with Sony it is indeed $1.921B (whereas some charts have it at $1,916.3M) — either way, Avatar 2 will swim past No Way Home (which, it should be noted, did not release in China) when today’s figures will be tallied.

Way of Water picked up another $9.5M overseas on Monday, lifting the offshore cume through yesterday to $1,344.6M. The 20th Century Studios/Disney sequel currently stands as the No. 5 biggest movie of all time at the international box office.

The Top 5 markets through Monday are: China ($214.5M), France ($122.4M), Germany ($107.7M), Korea ($93.1M) and the UK ($77.2M).
If some people had their way, this would all be Comcast's dough 🙄
 
My understanding is that he does. He was an owner of ToyBiz when it bought Marvel and survided the bankruptcy and the sale to Disney. He somehow has the juice to stay in his position despite the many failures of Marvel Comics.
Marvel bankruptcy brings back some bad memories...I held Marvel stock thru one of their bankruptcies...it was not pretty,

I know you mentioned it a while back but can you refresh my memory on what he's done to the comics? I haven't paid any attention to that side of the business in many years.
 



New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top