DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

Disney publicly admits what we have known for some time.

“We face risks relating to misalignment with public and consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment, travel and consumer products, which impact demand for our entertainment offerings and products and the profitability of any of our businesses,” the company’s 10-K filing noted.

“Generally, our revenues and profitability are adversely impacted when our entertainment offerings and products, as well as our methods to make our offerings and products available to consumers, do not achieve sufficient consumer acceptance,” the company said in the report.

“Further, consumers’ perceptions of our position on matters of public interest, including our efforts to achieve certain of our environmental and social goals, often differ widely and present risks to our reputation and brands,” the 10-K filing said.
 
Disney publicly admits what we have known for some time.

“We face risks relating to misalignment with public and consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment, travel and consumer products, which impact demand for our entertainment offerings and products and the profitability of any of our businesses,” the company’s 10-K filing noted.

“Generally, our revenues and profitability are adversely impacted when our entertainment offerings and products, as well as our methods to make our offerings and products available to consumers, do not achieve sufficient consumer acceptance,” the company said in the report.

“Further, consumers’ perceptions of our position on matters of public interest, including our efforts to achieve certain of our environmental and social goals, often differ widely and present risks to our reputation and brands,” the 10-K filing said.
That's pretty standard boilerplate for 10-Ks
 

They said the quiet part out loud here. Many of us know this and have been saying these type things on here for a good while now. I am personally pleased to see Disney admit they have a disconnect here. Ultimately we all want the same thing, a wildly successful Disney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dis
Disney has been putting that information in their 10-Q filings for a while, here is part from there 2019 Annual Report 10K page 19 is the following paragraph:

Misalignment with public and consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment and consumer products could negatively impact demand for our entertainment offerings and products and adversely affect the profitability of any of our businesses.

Our businesses create entertainment, travel and consumer products whose success depends substantially on consumer tastes and preferences that change in often unpredictable ways. The success of our businesses depends on our ability to consistently create filmed entertainment and television programming, which may be distributed among other ways through broadcast, cable, internet or cellular technology, theme park attractions, hotels and other resort facilities and travel experiences and consumer products that meet the changing preferences of the broad consumer market and respond to competition from an expanding array of choices facilitated by technological developments in the delivery of content. The success of our theme parks and experiences, as well as our theatrical releases, depends on demand for public or out-of-home entertainment experiences. Many of our businesses increasingly depend on acceptance of our offerings and products by consumers outside the U.S., and their success therefore depends on our ability to successfully predict and adapt to changing consumer tastes and preferences outside as well as inside the U.S. Moreover, we must often invest substantial amounts in film production, television programming, other content production, acquisition of sports rights, theme park attractions, cruise ships or hotels and other resort facilities before we know the extent to which these products will earn consumer acceptance. If our entertainment offerings and products do not achieve sufficient consumer acceptance, our revenue from advertising sales (which are based in part on ratings for the programs in which advertisements air), affiliate fees, subscription fees, theatrical film receipts, the license of rights to other distributors, theme park admissions, hotel room charges and merchandise, food and beverage sales, sales of licensed consumer products or from sales of our other consumer products and services, may decline or fail to grow to the extent we anticipate when making investment decisions and thereby adversely affect the profitability of one or more of our businesses


They are not all of a sudden saying this out loud for the first time, as others have already stated, it is a boiler plate statement that they have used for years.

Psy
 
“Environment and Social Goals” statement seems like a new point though correct? Did I miss this statement in the text from 2019?
 
Propbably not, but the social goals part is having a noticeable impact on the company. People aren't shy about expressing it vocally and with their wallets.
featuring content with diverse people from all walks of life is not a social goal, people existing is not an agenda. I don't know about you, but I personally do not consider simply having characters of color, male/female, gay/LGBQT characters a social agenda... an agenda is where something is actively promoted.

Please give me an example of a recent Disney film with a social agenda being promoted, for example where a certain lifestyle is actively promoted as a message in the film... love, kindness, caring, bravery are not new Disney messages.

interestingly enough the films that actually have a real agenda and message about the environment (Avatar 1 and 2) were both very successful.

People are not going to the movies' because of this or that 'agenda'... this is not a Disney thing, it is a global movie theater issue.... there are breakout films here and there, but overall people are not going to the movies anymore like they used to.... because the movie theater experience is being easily replaced in your living room, for less money, on your schedule, with your snacks and bathroom breaks... and without having to deal with people talking all throughout the film or on their phones... besides the ones in my family (whom I have to love and accept) despite being chatterboxes and phone addicts....
 
“Environment and Social Goals” statement seems like a new point though correct? Did I miss this statement in the text from 2019?
It looks the Social has been there since 2020:

Damage to our reputation or brands may negatively impact our business across segments and regions.Our reputation and globally recognizable brands are integral to the success of our businesses. Because our brands engageconsumers across our businesses, damage to our reputation or brands in one business may have an impact on our otherbusinesses. Because some of our brands are globally recognized, brand damage may not be locally contained. Maintenance ofthe reputation of our Company and brands depends on many factors including the quality of our offerings, maintenance of trustwith our customers and our ability to successfully innovate. Significant negative claims or publicity regarding the Company orits operations, products, management, employees, practices, business partners, business decisions, social responsibility andculture may damage our brands or reputation, even if such claims are untrue. Damage to our reputation or brands could impactour sales, business opportunities, profitability, recruiting and valuation of our securities

Environment looks to be added in 2021.

Though they do talk about Enviromental regulation changes that are a risk factor in previous filings.

Psy
 
featuring content with diverse people from all walks of life is not a social goal, people existing is not an agenda. I don't know about you, but I personally do not consider simply having characters of color, male/female, gay/LGBQT characters a social agenda... an agenda is where something is actively promoted.

Please give me an example of a recent Disney film with a social agenda being promoted, for example where a certain lifestyle is actively promoted as a message in the film... love, kindness, caring, bravery are not new Disney messages.

interestingly enough the films that actually have a real agenda and message about the environment (Avatar 1 and 2) were both very successful.

People are not going to the movies' because of this or that 'agenda'... this is not a Disney thing, it is a global movie theater issue.... there are breakout films here and there, but overall people are not going to the movies anymore like they used to.... because the movie theater experience is being easily replaced in your living room, for less money, on your schedule, with your snacks and bathroom breaks... and without having to deal with people talking all throughout the film or on their phones... besides the ones in my family (whom I have to love and accept) despite being chatterboxes and phone addicts....

You really get it. 👍
 
Please give me an example of a recent Disney film with a social agenda being promoted, for example where a certain lifestyle is actively promoted as a message in the film... love, kindness, caring, bravery are not new Disney messages.
Is Cars 2 (2011) recent enough? John Lasseter clearly had an anti-oil agenda, even though I suspect he owns at least one Hawaiian shirt with some polyester, rayban, spandex or vegan materials that contain oil-based fibers. Just remember all those vegan leather wearing eco-warriors gluing themselves to artwork or streets, are wearing oil based products and killing our planet.

Back to Cars 2. The bad guy in Cars 2 is fully invested in the oil industry, and what's worse is the bad guy is pretending to be an environmentally sound electric vehicle when in actuality he runs a petroleum based-engine and is leaking oil and polluting the planet. He also blames Mater for the oil spills. What a jerk!

The only way for Lightening McQueen to win the World Grand Prix is through sustainable, environmentally friendly bio-fuel. Except it is a cover up because the whole point of the race was to turn the world against bio-fuels. The big oil guy plants a bomb (yes, a literal bomb in a family movie) to blow-up our heroes and unsuspecting public motor vehicles. That's next level sinister! And, all the palm oil needed for bio-fuels destroys ecosystems in Southeast Asia. Think about it, are we saving the planet, harming the planet, or a combination, with bio-fuels.

Back to Cars 2, again. The bravery that Mater demonstrates gets him knighted by the Queen (who runs a petroleum based engine because she's an older model). Except foreigners are not allowed to use the title "Sir" or "Dame" when knighted and the Queen and everyone else calls Mater "Sir", which is inaccurate and may be politically motivated too. I'm not sure about that last part, though.

I do not blame you for not being aware of this example, because Cars 2 is a truly bad movie and I cannot recommend anyone watch it, social agenda notwithstanding.

Exit question: Do you want me to comment on Zootopia (2016)? Because I could spin some yarn about how the racist is a cunning, sneaky, deceptive fox who fits all sorts of stereotypes and then there's the whole government over-regulation thing too. :)
 
Is Cars 2 (2011) recent enough? John Lasseter clearly had an anti-oil agenda, even though I suspect he owns at least one Hawaiian shirt with some polyester, rayban, spandex or vegan materials that contain oil-based fibers. Just remember all those vegan leather wearing eco-warriors gluing themselves to artwork or streets, are wearing oil based products and killing our planet.

Back to Cars 2. The bad guy in Cars 2 is fully invested in the oil industry, and what's worse is the bad guy is pretending to be an environmentally sound electric vehicle when in actuality he runs a petroleum based-engine and is leaking oil and polluting the planet. He also blames Mater for the oil spills. What a jerk!

The only way for Lightening McQueen to win the World Grand Prix is through sustainable, environmentally friendly bio-fuel. Except it is a cover up because the whole point of the race was to turn the world against bio-fuels. The big oil guy plants a bomb (yes, a literal bomb in a family movie) to blow-up our heroes and unsuspecting public motor vehicles. That's next level sinister! And, all the palm oil needed for bio-fuels destroys ecosystems in Southeast Asia. Think about it, are we saving the planet, harming the planet, or a combination, with bio-fuels.

Back to Cars 2, again. The bravery that Mater demonstrates gets him knighted by the Queen (who runs a petroleum based engine because she's an older model). Except foreigners are not allowed to use the title "Sir" or "Dame" when knighted and the Queen and everyone else calls Mater "Sir", which is inaccurate and may be politically motivated too. I'm not sure about that last part, though.

I do not blame you for not being aware of this example, because Cars 2 is a truly bad movie and I cannot recommend anyone watch it, social agenda notwithstanding.

Exit question: Do you want me to comment on Zootopia (2016)? Because I could spin some yarn about how the racist is a cunning, sneaky, deceptive fox who fits all sorts of stereotypes and then there's the whole government over-regulation thing too. :)
I never saw either of the two cars movies, so besides knowing they are about cars lol, I dont know too much else about them

and while I was kinda looking for more within the last 5 years recent... don't let that stop you.... comment away, it is a discussion board after all.
 
I never saw either of the two cars movies

There is actually 3 Cars movies and 2 additional spin-offs. You have my permission to watch Cars ;) and you definitely want to visit Cars Land at DCA (it appears from your signature that you haven't been to DLR). I loved it!
 
There is actually 3 Cars movies and 2 additional spin-offs. You have my permission to watch Cars ;) and you definitely want to visit Cars Land at DCA (it appears from your signature that you haven't been to DLR). I loved it!
i went once to both parks in Ca, managed to sneak away from a Biology Conference at the convention center in 2010 and I had a fab time... so very much want to go again, they have added so much since then. I have heard CarsLand is awesome
 
https://variety.com/2023/film/box-o...an-2-movie-theater-owners-worried-1235810010/

Nov 28, 2023 6:30am PST
Christmas at the Box Office Hinges on ‘Aquaman 2.’ Movie Theater Owners Are Worried.
by Rebecca Rubin

Every year around Christmas, Phoenix Theatres puts all of its chips on one major tentpole, gambling on a movie so big, so broadly appealing, it’ll keep auditoriums stocked into the new year. In the recent past, the Midwest-based chain has gone all in on 2022’s “Avatar: The Way of Water,” 2021’s “Spider-Man: No Way Home” and 2019’s “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.”

But this holiday season is different. For the first time in more than a decade, excluding the pandemic-stricken 2020, there’s no surefire blockbuster with the potential to gross $1 billion globally to cap off the year.

“You can’t look at the release schedule between now and the end of the year and find one movie that stands out like ‘Avatar’ as the big film,” says Phoenix Theatres owner Cory Jacobson.

Aquaman and The Lost Kingdom,” the follow-up to 2018’s megahit “Aquaman,” should be that big bet. Yet the sequel lands in theaters on Dec. 22 as a massive question mark. Will the Jason Momoa-led comic book adventure recapture the spark of the original? Or will it extend the string of three DC flops, “The Flash,” “Shazam! Fury of the Gods” and “Blue Beetle”? The overwhelming sense of superhero fatigue has even plagued Disney’s once-bulletproof Marvel Cinematic Universe, as evidenced by the misfires of “The Marvels” and “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.”

“The holiday season is on the shoulders of ‘Aquaman,’ and that’s not a good shoulder to put anything on,” says Jeff Bock, an analyst with Exhibitor Relations. “Can it cut through the negative DC noise?”

Movie theater owners, who were walloped by the Hollywood strikes as they were still recovering from the pandemic, have no choice but to accentuate the positive. “With one big film, you must stock a lot of show times to meet demands. If it doesn’t work out, you end up with a lot of empty show times,” Phoenix Theatres VP Jordan Hohman says. “With a more diverse slate of films, we can spread our bets.”

For this year’s holiday stretch, the gambles include “Wonka,” with Timothée Chalamet as the titular chocolatier (Dec. 15); Universal and Illumination’s animated comedy “Migration” (Dec. 22); A24’s sports drama “The Iron Claw,” starring Zac Efron and Jeremy Allen White (also Dec. 22); and the musical adaptation “The Color Purple” (Dec. 25).
Hohman is encouraged by the number of kid-friendly movies. “That certainly helps our popcorn sales,” he says. “And these family films are under two hours. It creates turnover and puts more customers in the building.”

But unless there’s a runaway success in the mix, these films won’t offset the absence of a billion-dollar tentpole.

“It’s probably not going to be the most spectacular Christmas season,” predicts Jim Orr, Universal’s president of domestic theatrical distribution. “It may give other movies room to overperform.”

It would be a disappointing coda for the movie theater business, especially in a year that fielded “Barbenheimer” and the unexpected gift of Taylor Swift’s “The Eras Tour.” At this point, box office revenues have hit $8 billion, which is 22% ahead of 2022 but 17% behind 2019, according to Comscore.

“With the strikes, it would have been hard to do much to change this,” says Adam Fogelson, Lionsgate Motion Picture Group vice chair. Production has started to return, but he expects the release calendar to remain fluid as studios figure out which strike-impaired projects will make it to the finish line on time. “In the short run, there will be some awkward and odd bumps.”

What’s worse: Without a four-quadrant title — the rare movie that appeals to men and women, young and old — theaters may be left in the lurch until “Dune: Part Two” opens in March. That’s because eventual big-screen behemoths like “Avatar” and “Spider-Man” didn’t just pop in December, they kept playing in theaters for weeks and ended up earning some serious coin in the following year. “The Way of Water,” for example, was released in 2022 but stands as the seventh-highest-grossing domestic release of 2023 with $283 million.

Jeff Logan, the owner of Logan Luxury Theatres, jokes that needing to show the same film for weeks to fill demand isn’t an issue in South Dakota, where his multiplexes are located. “In smaller towns, you’ve run out of people to see a movie after it’s playing in theaters for a few weeks.”

He adds, “We just wish there were more movies in the mix.”

“Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” could certainly surprise. The first film opened to an unspectacular $67 million but eventually grossed a staggering $335 million in North America and $1.15 billion globally. But the very idea that the sequel isn’t a guaranteed smash is indicative of larger concerns in Hollywood.

“We’re seeing the collapse of these major franchises,” says Bock. “This year has proven that audiences do want original things. Hollywood can’t just put a roman numeral on things.”

If “Aquaman 2” misses the mark, it’ll join “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny,” “Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning Part One” and a slew of other sequels, spinoffs and reboots that appeared to be guaranteed winners, only to wildly miss box office expectations. Theater owners like Logan believe that studios may be running a good thing into the ground.

“Studios have IP, and they think it’s a golden ticket. But it’s oversaturated. We’ve seen it all before … multiple times,” Logan says. “These things aren’t events anymore. They aren’t rare. It’s just this month’s superhero movie.
 
https://www.wsj.com/business/media/...ern-version-of-company-e5ff88a2?siteid=yhoof2

Disney’s Bob Iger Plays Down Asset Sales, Vows to Build Modern Version of Company
Chief executive of entertainment company spoke at company town hall in New York
By Joe Flint
Updated Nov. 28, 2023 1:54 pm ET

Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger told employees Tuesday that the task he faced after returning to the company a year ago was harder than expected, and he played down his previous comments suggesting major asset sales were on the table.

“I knew that there were a myriad of challenges…I must say there were many more of them than I expected,” said Iger, who was interviewed by ABC News anchor David Muir at a companywide town hall at New York’s New Amsterdam Theatre.

Iger said he plans to spend the next year building the “modern version of the Walt Disney Company,” but offered few new details of what that would entail.

Asked about his comments regarding potential asset sales, which Iger made last summer on CNBC, the Disney CEO said a fault of his may be that he likes to “run things up flagpoles to see how they will fly” and “think out loud” to signal to the investment community that the company is open-minded about its future.

“I did not think everyone would run with a story that everything is being sold, which is not the case,” Iger said. No decisions have been made, he added.

Iger was joined on stage by ESPN Chief Jimmy Pitaro, Disney Entertainment co-chairs Dana Walden and Alan Bergman and parks and resorts head Josh D’Amaro.

Iger said that Walden and Pitaro have been examining their businesses, which include ESPN, ABC, Disney Channel and FX, to make them more efficient and assess their strategic value to the company, which he said is still “pretty significant.

Launching a direct-to-consumer version of ESPN that has all the content of the flagship cable network is top on the company’s list of construction projects. Pitaro reiterated that such a streaming service is expected to launch by 2025 at the latest.

Muir asked both Iger and Pitaro about Disney’s search for partners for ESPN. They provided few details beyond saying they have been talking with sports leagues and tech companies.

Iger said partners aren’t mandatory for ESPN’s future plans. “We could go it alone. We are fully prepared to do that. It would be a little more challenging if we did,” Iger said.

Iger spent much of his time explaining the decision to pump $60 billion into Disney’s parks and resorts business, saying, “This is a business where you spend to succeed.” The parks and resorts operations have been showing the biggest growth potential and should be allocated the most capital, he said.

Iger wasn’t asked about Disney’s battle with activist investor Nelson Peltz, whose firm has acquired a substantial Disney stake and is pushing for board seats.

Write to Joe Flint at Joe.Flint@wsj.com
 
https://deadline.com/2023/11/bob-iger-leads-disney-town-hall-theme-parks-espn-1235640236/

Disney Execs Talk Quality Over Quantity, Plug Parks, Say ESPN Still Eyeing 2025 DTC Launch In First Readout From Bob Iger’s Town Hall
By Jill Goldsmith, Anthony D'Alessandro, Nellie Andreeva
November 28, 2023 11:03am PST

Disney’s anticipated all staff town hall has ended with no major announcements but CEO Bob Iger and top execs stressing a commitment to quality over quantity as the studio’s film slate has had a bumpy ride.

No news on strategic partners for ESPN, but the sports juggernaut is still on track for a 2025 streaming launch, according to town hall attendees. Parks are a bright spot and were front and center.

Appearing on stage for a roughly hour town hall at New York City’s New Amsterdam theater, Iger, alongside ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro, Disney Theme Parks President Josh Damaro, and Disney Entertainment co-Chairs Dana Walden and Alan Bergman, continued to emphasize a similar narrative from the latest earnings earlier this month.

It was all “grounds to be optimistic” was one Disney attendee characterized the town hall.

Pitaro reiterated plans for ESPN hitting its 2025 goal to be direct-to-consumer.

Meanwhile, Walden emphasized how the combined Hulu and Disney+ one-app experience will be in beta testing later this month, with plans for a full rollout in March.

Pom poms were waved on theme park side with Damaro emphasizing the $60 billion investment on the experiences side, while underscoring how the parks have rebounded greatly coming out of the pandemic in regards to attendance. The new Frozenland at Hong Kong Disneyland is considered to be success, evidence of how Disney still has the touch when it comes to brining magical experiences to life.

Bergman emphasized much of the same message that Iger stressed on the earnings call how the studio’s mission in a year of misfires such as Elemental, Wish, The Marvels, and Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny will be one of quality over quantity. Great storytelling is the be all and end-all to success, and when it works sends out a positive ripple effect into the theme parks and consumer products. Essentially after the down box office year, Bergman spoke about how it was essential to learn from the company’s shortcomings and move ahead. He expressed excitement for near year’s slate which includes The Omen prequel, a new Planet of the Apes and Deadpool 3 which recently resumed filming post actors’ strike.

David Muir of ABC News moderated the session.

Disney’s anticipated all-hands meeting comes as the company faces a multitude of challenges at just over the one-year mark of Iger’s return to the helm. Things were tough then as well but Iger was newly on board to the relief of investors and employees. The big news then was no merger with Apple and no new acquisitions. All true so far, save for the upcoming multi-billion dollar purchase of Comcast’s stake in Hulu.

Iger got to work, unwinding an unpopular corporate structure devised by (his annointed) predecessor Bob Chapek, and would go on to cut 7,000 jobs.

According to sources, Iger struck an optimistic tone and was largely forward-looking in his comments, noting that he is fueled by the creativity in the room and the storytelling.

He talked a lot about being out of the fixing phase and into the building phase of his second tenure at Disney. He spoke how, after a lot of work, the company is realizing the value of its linear assets and now the goal is to be able to build on top of them for the future.

Speaking with Muir, Iger shared how much he loves ABC News and everything the ABC News team does.

Walden spoke about how Hulu and ABC audiences are complimentary and not duplicative and how meaningful it is to be able to meet audiences where they are. She noted that the median age of broadcast viewer is 60+ while on Hulu/streaming, it’s 30+, so when you combine that, you can reach a massive audience of different ages.

The example she gave was ABC’s breakout new reality hit The Golden Bachelor, which has been attracting large viewership on both the broadcast network and on Hulu.

Both Iger and Walden talked about the One App experience launching in March and how great it’s going to be for Disney’s general entertainment titles to be on the app alongside its branded content.

Muir joked that The Golden Bachelor and The Bear would be able to reside next to World News Tonight. The Golden Bachelor was a running theme, providing levity to the proceedings, with audience members trying hard to get the scoop on who had won Gerry’s heart but they were asked to tune in on Thursday.

More to come…
 



New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top