fatmanatee
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Messages
- 3,651
So much for Disney walking away from guaranteed revenue.
yeah, lol, this seems like they're going to move forward with a worst of all worlds, where direct-to-consumer will look more like "direct-to-consumer through our partner channels"So much for Disney walking away from guaranteed revenue.
That was my takeaway. Gave the list of channels that are actively on the outs for the company.Because they're on the chopping block anyway.![]()
yeah, lol, this seems like they're going to move forward with a worst of all worlds, where direct-to-consumer will look more like "direct-to-consumer through our partner channels"
The Walt Disney Company And Charter Communications Announce Transformative Agreement For Distribution Of Disney’s Linear Networks And Direct-To-Consumer Services
The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) and Charter Communications (NASDAQ: CHTR) today announced a transformative, multiyear distribution agreement that maximizes value for consumers and supports the linear TV experience as the industry continues to evolve. As part of the deal, the majority of Disney’s networks and stations will be immediately restored to Spectrum’s video customers.
In a joint statement, Robert A. Iger, CEO, The Walt Disney Company, and Chris Winfrey, CEO, Charter Communications, said: “Our collective goal has always been to build an innovative model for the future. This deal recognizes both the continued value of linear television and the growing popularity of streaming services while addressing the evolving needs of our consumers. We also want to thank our mutual customers for their patience this past week and are pleased that Spectrum viewers once again have access to Disney’s high-quality sports, news and entertainment programming, in time for Monday Night Football.”
Networks that will no longer be included in Spectrum TV video packages are Baby TV, Disney Junior, Disney XD, Freeform, FXM, FXX, Nat Geo Wild and Nat Geo Mundo.
They’re hopefully going to sell them.Because they're on the chopping block anyway.![]()
They’re hopefully going to sell them.
Consumer this week: I want the ability to pay for just the channels I want to watch. Packages are too expensive.
Consumer next week: Channels cost too much individually. Why can't they bundle them and cut me a deal?
Not that businesses can't be greedy, but the consumer can't have it both ways. It's like asking for a group discount, and then say, ""well, just give me one or two at that price". Not how it works.
But this is nothing new or unique to the entertainment industry. You see it everywhere. People are so used to having your way, right away at Burger King now that they think anything they want can and should happen. Many want goods/services to be cheap, but high quality. But also made here to support American jobs, and those jobs should be high paying. But those companies better make a ton of profit from the high quality. cheaply price goods that are made by well paid employees, because that 401k needs to look good. It's not just having it both ways anymore. It's having it every way, without compromise. I want what i want, I'm entitled to it, and anything else is robbery or unfair. lol
Bingo!It actually could be affordable if salaries and production costs were reigned in.
Free TV existed for decades with timeless hits, sports, etc. The difference being every single person involved wasn't trying to hold out for million dollar contracts
It actually could be affordable if salaries and production costs were reigned in.
It actually could be affordable if salaries and production costs were reigned in.
Free TV existed for decades with timeless hits, sports, etc. The difference being every single person involved wasn't trying to hold out for million dollar contracts
IMHO, there never was any such thing as "free" tv. It was paid for by advertising and the cost to viewers was the time you where you were forced to watch the ads during the program.It actually could be affordable if salaries and production costs were reigned in.
Free TV existed for decades with timeless hits, sports, etc. The difference being every single person involved wasn't trying to hold out for million dollar contracts
IMHO, there never was any such thing as "free" tv. It was paid for by advertising and the cost to viewers was the time you where you were forced to watch the ads during the program.
Again, IMHO only.
If you have unlimited budgets, they'll spend it all, every time.Correct and now you are forced to pay for the "premium" tv and watch a lot of ads on top of that. So basically exactly my point. That's not needed without absurd budgets.
If you have unlimited budgets, they'll spend it all, every time.