So the news flash is "Finance clashes with Ops over budgets and cost cutting"...Is that really supposed to be some kind of amazing revelation...Sorry but that has been every day of my freak'in life for my entire career. LOL
So the news flash is "Finance clashes with Ops over budgets and cost cutting"...Is that really supposed to be some kind of amazing revelation...Sorry but that has been every day of my freak'in life for my entire career. LOL
What is the scoop on McCarthy? Is this simply family medical leave, or is there something to her and Iger butting heads?
It’s probably medical leave. They’ve both been with the company for a long time, don’t see any reason why things would turn so toxic that she’d be forced out all of a sudden (and she still maintains an advisory role).What is the scoop on this? Is this simply family medical leave, or is there something to her and Iger butting heads?
It’s probably medical leave. They’ve both been with the company for a long time, don’t see any reason why things would turn so toxic that she’d be forced out all of a sudden (and she still maintains an advisory role).
I'm starting to think it's not just a talent issue with Pixar. I think Disney has a full blown Disney+ problem that's now hurting all their theatrical releases, including Marvel. For 2+ years, they trained their audience to watch these movies on Disney+. With theaters at full strength again, it's hard to unlearn that notion. Disney movies just may not be event movies any longer when you can wait a few months and catch them in your home. Illumination does have that problem. Sony doesn't have that problem. You have to go see Mario and Spider-verse in the theater because it could be 6 months before the movies are out on a streaming platform.https://www.wsj.com/articles/elemental-struggles-on-opening-weekend-the-flash-also-flat-36f5789b
‘Elemental’ Struggles on Opening Weekend; ‘The Flash’ Also Flat
The Wall Street Journal •
By Ginger Adams Otis
June 18, 2023 3:42 pm ET
Pixar’s “Elemental,” a $200-million animated rom-com, failed to spark audiences in its opening weekend, earning an estimated $29.5 million at the box office domestically in one of the worst debuts in the studio’s history.
“The Flash,” a Warner Bros. time-traveling superhero story from the DC multiverse that also cost about $200 million to produce, also fell flat. It took in $55.1 million in the U.S. and Canada during its three-day debut, according to Comscore, which compiles box-office data.
“The Flash” earned an additional estimated $75 million at the international box office, bringing its global tally to $139 million over its opening weekend.
“Elemental,” an animated adventure about opposites who attract, added an estimated $15 million at the international box office for a global total of $44.5 million.
Both films still have time to rebound with moviegoers before more summer competition arrives, said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for Comscore. “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” will hit theaters on June 30 and “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One” follows July 12.
“I wouldn’t write Pixar off yet,” he said, noting that the studio’s reputation for cranking out hits has raised expectations for immediate box office success.
Audiences that have seen “Elemental” responded well to the animated rom-com story line. Yet its debut weekend ranked below even some of Pixar’s lesser-known animations, such as “The Good Dinosaur,” which earned $39 million on its opening weekend in 2015, and 2020’s “Onward” with $39 million.
Disney, which owns Pixar, has scored major wins with the studio’s blockbusters in the past, such as “Toy Story,” Up” and “Ratatouille.” In 2016 “Finding Dory,” a sequel to the 2003 hit “Finding Nemo,” grossed $139 million on its opening weekend.
Pixar’s last box-office blowout came in 2019 when “Toy Story 4” generated $120 million in sales. In 2022, “Lightyear,” the origin story of Buzz Lightyear, the toy space ranger from the Toy Story movies, took in $51 million on its opening weekend, despite being the first Pixar film shown in theaters in more than two years.
Disney’s bumpy transition to streaming also has proved challenging for Pixar. It sent three Pixar movies, “Soul,” “Luca” and “Turning Red”—all of them released during periods of heightened spread of Covid-19—straight to the Disney+ streaming service, hoping they would help drive subscription growth at a time when many cinemas remained closed and consumers were wary of gathering indoors.
Since 2019, when Disney+ launched, Disney’s streaming segment has lost nearly $10 billion, as the company has spent heavily on content to attract subscribers.
He recently hinted that Disney could raise subscription prices and begin licensing its streaming content to competitors as part of his plan to restructure the company and cut costs to better position it for the long term.
Earlier this year Disney said it would shed as many as 7,000 jobs through layoffs over the spring. Staff reductions occurred in March and in April, affecting ESPN and other divisions.
Last week, Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy, who has been a key executive at the entertainment giant for more than two decades, announced her departure. Disney said McCarthy is taking a family medical leave, but her exit caught some colleagues and associates by surprise.
Write to Ginger Adams Otis at Ginger.AdamsOtis@wsj.com
I'm starting to think it's not just a talent issue with Pixar. I think Disney has a full blown Disney+ problem that's now hurting all their theatrical releases, including Marvel. For 2+ years, they trained their audience to watch these movies on Disney+. With theaters at full strength again, it's hard to unlearn that notion. Disney movies just may not be event movies any longer when you can wait a few months and catch them in your home. Illumination does have that problem. Sony doesn't have that problem. You have to go see Mario and Spider-verse in the theater because it could be 6 months before the movies are out on a streaming platform.
Anecdotally, we usually go see a Pixar or Disney movie in the theater for Father's Day. We just got back from our vacation where we spent a lot of money so we decided to wait on seeing Elemental and instead opted for another Disney movie we passed on seeing in theaters, Strange World. And it was great. We'll go see Elemental maybe later this week at a matinee or next weekend but I've even noticed there are less theaters showing Elemental than some of the other movies that are out right now.
Pete Docter with a similar stance:I'm starting to think it's not just a talent issue with Pixar. I think Disney has a full blown Disney+ problem that's now hurting all their theatrical releases, including Marvel. For 2+ years, they trained their audience to watch these movies on Disney+. With theaters at full strength again, it's hard to unlearn that notion. Disney movies just may not be event movies any longer when you can wait a few months and catch them in your home. Illumination does have that problem. Sony doesn't have that problem. You have to go see Mario and Spider-verse in the theater because it could be 6 months before the movies are out on a streaming platform.
Anecdotally, we usually go see a Pixar or Disney movie in the theater for Father's Day. We just got back from our vacation where we spent a lot of money so we decided to wait on seeing Elemental and instead opted for another Disney movie we passed on seeing in theaters, Strange World. And it was great. We'll go see Elemental maybe later this week at a matinee or next weekend but I've even noticed there are less theaters showing Elemental than some of the other movies that are out right now.
I think Iger is going to have a tough choice to make on Disney+ because it's killing their domestic box office. Disney+ needs to be simply for streaming shows and not theatrical releases until the normal physical media window opens. I'm not discounting that maybe Disney movies just aren't as good now but there's a definite problem there that you can wait just a few months and see these films that shouldn't be available for at least 6 months. But now it's a bit of the snake eating its tail if they cut out movies. Then people might stop subscribing. It helped the company limp through Covid but it's killing them now.Yes, that short D+ window is a problem. It's time to rething the streaming strategy. I am sure they are doing just that, but they move SO SLOW. They have got to fix this.
Strange World was very good too and deserved better. I think it will have a nostalgic cult following after a while though.
It's a very tough spot I agree. If Disney+ was making lots of money it could be a winning strategy, but it loses money still. So, you have hurt your theatrical releases to aid a streaming platform that has yet to make money. Not a winning strategy currently.I think Iger is going to have a tough choice to make on Disney+ because it's killing their domestic box office. Disney+ needs to be simply for streaming shows and not theatrical releases until the normal physical media window opens. I'm not discounting that maybe Disney movies just aren't as good now but there's a definite problem there that you can wait just a few months and see these films that shouldn't be available for at least 6 months. But now it's a bit of the snake eating its tail if they cut out movies. Then people might stop subscribing. It helped the company limp through Covid but it's killing them now.
I think Iger is going to have a tough choice to make on Disney+ because it's killing their domestic box office. Disney+ needs to be simply for streaming shows and not theatrical releases until the normal physical media window opens. I'm not discounting that maybe Disney movies just aren't as good now but there's a definite problem there that you can wait just a few months and see these films that shouldn't be available for at least 6 months. But now it's a bit of the snake eating its tail if they cut out movies. Then people might stop subscribing. It helped the company limp through Covid but it's killing them now.
Yep. I wonder how much of Disney's resources were shifted by Chapek to produce Disney+ content? When you look at the scale of some of these releases like Andor and Secret Invasion, you have to wonder what is losing out on the theatrical side in terms of special effects work and production. Maybe that's also contributing to the talent drain from places like Pixar.It's a very tough spot I agree. If Disney+ was making lots of money it could be a winning strategy, but it loses money still. So, you have hurt your theatrical releases to aid a streaming platform that has yet to make money. Not a winning strategy currently.
Yep. I wonder how much of Disney's resources were shifted by Chapek to produce Disney+ content? When you look at the scale of some of these releases like Andor and Secret Invasion, you have to wonder what is losing out on the theatrical side in terms of special effects work and production. Maybe that's also contributing to the talent drain from places like Pixar.
This is the wayYeah, I know COVID threw the world for a loop, but Chapek really damaged Disney with his management through it. The actualy best thing to do - hindsight being 20/20 and all - would have been to pursue business as usual. When theaters were closed, just hold the releases. It was really such a short time in the overall scheme of things. Disney+ was already in the works, but as more of an archive. Shift back to that model.
Agreed but there's a huge risk if Iger does a massive correction and pushes the release window for Disney+ back to an appropriate level. Though we may have seen the popularity of Disney+ already reach its peak with the 2nd season of Mandalorian. It seems to be hitting a downslope now. So if he does the correction and the audience doesn't return then Disney is in an even bigger pickle.Yeah, I know COVID threw the world for a loop, but Chapek really damaged Disney with his management through it. The actualy best thing to do - hindsight being 20/20 and all - would have been to pursue business as usual. When theaters were closed, just hold the releases. It was really such a short time in the overall scheme of things. Disney+ was already in the works, but as more of an archive. Shift back to that model.
Agreed but there's a huge risk if Iger does a massive correction and pushes the release window for Disney+ back to an appropriate level. Though we may have seen the popularity of Disney+ already reach its peak with the 2nd season of Mandalorian. It seems to be hitting a downslope now. So if he does the correction and the audience doesn't return then Disney is in an even bigger pickle.
I still think the key is content people want to watch. If Disney+ had a "Yellowstone" level of viewership show on Disney+ we would not be having this conversation. Disney+ needs another hit badly, like that end of Mandalorian season 2 kind of hit. Like a Stranger Things or Squid Game level hit. Like a Yellowstone level hit. Like a Game of Thrones level hit. Hire the absolute best creatives and control their budgets aggressively. Abandon any decision that can in any way be seen as politically driven or not family friendly. Use focus groups of new and old Disney fans, and listen to them!Agreed but there's a huge risk if Iger does a massive correction and pushes the release window for Disney+ back to an appropriate level. Though we may have seen the popularity of Disney+ already reach its peak with the 2nd season of Mandalorian. It seems to be hitting a downslope now. So if he does the correction and the audience doesn't return then Disney is in an even bigger pickle.