For the past 4 years we have done business with a highly regarded stockbroker in one of the major brokerage houses. He has had discretion to trade our accounts - although I have repeatedly asked him to consult with me. Actually, I have insisted on it. However, he does not consult with me as I have asked (demanded).
He has done ok - not tremendous although he insists it is tremendous. However, despite my saying repeatedly that I want and need INCOME and that the stuff he had is much too volatile for our age and life style, he has put $ into growth stocks. He did very well over the past couple of months, but in the past two weeks he has lost over $50,000, $16,000 in the past two days alone.
I sent him an e-mail this morning reiterating that I am very unhappy and questioning some of the things he has done. He has called me 3 times today. He says I was happy with the big increase, implying that I have no right to be unhappy because he lost so much of the increase and that we are still up over the beginning of the year. Finally, he is saying that he will do what I want and will fix everything. (Too little, too late I think) He also maintains that he is much too busy making $ for us to discuss trades with me.
On Thursday my sister's broker is coming to the house (an 80 mile drive for him and I hope I don't go with him just because I feel guilty about that but I think I will change to him.
To cut to the chase FINALLY, my present broker is asking that I write him saying my previous memo was not a complaint. I told him it WAS a complaint - that he had assured me he had removed everything volatile from my account and yet we had a $16,000 loss in 2 days and that's excessive in view of the total amount of the account - at least to my way of thinking. Apparently his "manager," although he is a senior vp, is very unhappy about the complaint and the broker wants me to soften it. My thinking is is that it should stand, especially if later there is some legal action involved - although I doubt there will be.
What do you think? Should I soften it, although I stand by my thinking, in order to save this guy's butt, or let it stand?
He has done ok - not tremendous although he insists it is tremendous. However, despite my saying repeatedly that I want and need INCOME and that the stuff he had is much too volatile for our age and life style, he has put $ into growth stocks. He did very well over the past couple of months, but in the past two weeks he has lost over $50,000, $16,000 in the past two days alone.
I sent him an e-mail this morning reiterating that I am very unhappy and questioning some of the things he has done. He has called me 3 times today. He says I was happy with the big increase, implying that I have no right to be unhappy because he lost so much of the increase and that we are still up over the beginning of the year. Finally, he is saying that he will do what I want and will fix everything. (Too little, too late I think) He also maintains that he is much too busy making $ for us to discuss trades with me.
On Thursday my sister's broker is coming to the house (an 80 mile drive for him and I hope I don't go with him just because I feel guilty about that but I think I will change to him.
To cut to the chase FINALLY, my present broker is asking that I write him saying my previous memo was not a complaint. I told him it WAS a complaint - that he had assured me he had removed everything volatile from my account and yet we had a $16,000 loss in 2 days and that's excessive in view of the total amount of the account - at least to my way of thinking. Apparently his "manager," although he is a senior vp, is very unhappy about the complaint and the broker wants me to soften it. My thinking is is that it should stand, especially if later there is some legal action involved - although I doubt there will be.
What do you think? Should I soften it, although I stand by my thinking, in order to save this guy's butt, or let it stand?