Yacht Club Family said:My sincerest to the family. They are from KY, so we've heard about it quite a bit since it happened. As horrible as it was, I also agree that sometimes no one is to blame. Life goes on, good, bad and everything in between. Our society has started finding blame and fault for everything like that makes it better. I don't care if they got a billion dollars from the park or the pediatrician, it won't bring back their son.
If lightning struck and killed someone, who would you (generic) sue, the local meteorologist for not telling you when to come in out of the rain?? Nope. Sometimes, bad things happen...period.
I think the important thing is allowing the family peace and dignity in dealing with a horrific situation. Our sincerest prayers to them.
This really worries me. I hope the family, rather than sue Disney or anything, leave Disney alone cuz I'd be livid at my son's pediatrician. I cant stand that I feel like this has been happening more and more. What needs to be done is that doctors and pediatricians need to make heart testing mandatory, it should be a regulated standardized test done for everyone every year...this way they can decide which rides are okay for them to go on...not find out after it's too late. This heart ailment thing is something I keep hearing about that continues to go seemingly undetected (ex: last years little boy, this years little boy, a girl that went to the district I work at, John Ritter, ...). But thats because tests on your heart isnt something people thinkl to get checked out, especially the youngins! I dont know, I think when I become a parent I'm going to ask my doctor to check EVERYTHING on my kid, just to be on the safe side. I'm only 25 years old but I recently had my heart and aorta checked out.
WDW Poly Princess said:I may be confusing RnR with a different ride, but I seem to recall a story from a while back where a ride was stopped because someone didn't look right on the control room's monitors? Does anyone else remember this?
I can completely understand the CMs not telling the real reason why the ride is closed- they would get a thousand questions about what happened, and they really didn't have enough info to answer them yet. I am surprised if they were saying they didn't know- doesn't Disney have a rule against cast members saying I don't know? I'm surprised they didn't say something like the ride was closed for maintenance or testing, though.
I must be horrible anytime a child dies of an a problem that you never even knew they had, but I can't imagine how much worse it must be when you're on a family vacation!
pafer said:Why are so many ppl today so quick to wish to place blame and then try to make money out of accidents. Comments like the one above and several I read after it really upset me. Malpractice insurance rates for physicians are sky rocketing as it is because so many ppl see things like this as a way to never have to work again.
My DH is a pediatrician and I am a nurse. Many ppl on this thread have already talked about why this might have happened and how a defibrilator may not have worked. Many have mentioned why it is not possible to always diagnose these congenital heart defects.The ppl that posted these comments have knowledge that the general public do not have. Medical training that you do not have. Pediatricians are not God, they cannot see things in hindsight that you see now! They do what they can with the knowledge they have to deal with. If this boy had no signs of any heart problems then why do any tests to check the heart? Insurance companies do not cover tests done with no medical necessity. Most families do not have the extra thousands of dollars lying around to pay for the tests themselves. Oh and like already mentioned these test might not have noticed the problem unless it occured while testing. So why then must ppl continue to look for the person who should be sued. It is not the physicians fault, it is not the rollercoasters fault, it is not the fault of the Disney Corporation. It is a tragic accident which occured as a result of underlying issues no one was aware of at the time.
I hope this family does not sue anyone. What good would it do? It would not bring back their son. It would not turn back time to prevent it from happening again. Money will not ease their grief.
If doctors could find anything, then presumably we'd be able to live forever. I've known some doctors with "God complexes" but I've yet to meet one with God's powers.helenm29 said:they are DOCTORS, they are supposed to be able to find ANYTHING right?
snowy76 said:If doctors could find anything, then presumably we'd be able to live forever. I've known some doctors with "God complexes" but I've yet to meet one with God's powers.
My aunt just died from mesothelioma (cancer of the lining of the lungs and heart) at age 60. It was caused by breathing in asbestos somewhere, sometime before she finished high school (we think) since symptoms of the illness don't show for at least 30 years. How was a doctor supposed to find that?? Her 80-something mother (my grandma) outlived her. Fair? No. But this is how life goes. You take the good with the bad. Looking for blame is a natural part of the grief process, but that doesn't mean that someone IS actually to blame.
mickeyluv'r said:How do we know for certain that this family did NOT know their son had a heart condition? I feel bad for this family. Losing a child is awful, but we might be speculating here...Many heart conditions ARE discovered when children are born.
I'm not judging THIS family at all...but I've seen lots of other families ignore the warnings at WDW - pregnant women, children who are too short trying to sneak on a ride, etc. We even saw a dad hold his son out over the fire pit at AKL!
Mind, some rides that are pretty tame have tons of warnings now - so that it's hard to tell when you really should heed the warnings, and when they are just frivolous-lawsuit protection.
In any event, a sad situation...
polkadotladybug said:I haven't read all the posts, but I keep thinking about how awful this is for the boy's family.
I also think about the after-ride photo (I think it's taken right when you are taking off into the tunnel?) - if you could tell anything from his expression? Weird to think about but it's still on my mind.
Mom2Casey said:OMG, I didn't even think of that. I am sure people bought pictures before Disney knew the boy died thus WHAT IF it showed an expression or even worse... him limp and non responsive!! What would you do knowing you had him in YOUR picture? That is just an eerie thing to think about!!![]()
One question I've been wondering.. HOW can people sue Disney when it comes back that the person who died had a problem and Disney's ride did NOT malfunction? Just wondering how a lawyer can say it would be the fault of Disney's as they post warnings and give it a height requirement. Some don't realize the warnings COULD be for them (hence an undetected heart problem) and they are tall enough and think it's ok to ride, I mean why wouldn't they? In this particular case, they were unaware of any heart condition and he met the height requirement however it was an unfortunate ending to the ride. How is Disney at fault for that?? It doesn't seem to be anyone's fault. I personally would be asking a doctor all the whys!!