As someone who has been in the restaurant industry since I was 15 and bussed tables and then got out when I ran the restaurant in a hotel/restaurant chain, I have seen it all.
When I waited tables I made less than $ 1.25/hr, worked doubles which meant I was in at 10:00 am to prep for lunch, left at 2:00 pm and came back at 4:00 pm to prep for dinner. Usually I would not get out until 1:00 am because of clean up. Then repeat it all over again. Of the 13 hours I worked, I was lucky to have rotating tables for 6 hours. Now, I chose this profession and I was very good, I made a lot of money, but I worked my butt off and sacrificed a lot to do it. Imagine being 17-25 years old and your life rotated around a restaurant working 15 hour days (really what could I do between 2 and 4 every day). Working at food service is not for everyone. But it paid my way through college.
Early on I could easily cheat Uncle Sam out of his cut, but it doesn't happen very often now. The books are scrutinized and you will be held accountable for at least 12% in most circumstances. 12% doesn't sound fair if you get 20%, but most waitstaff must tip out the bartenders and bus staff and lately the kitchen. I have never had a problem with this, these people work their butts off too, although their hourly wage is significantly higher.
That being said, I personally do not agree with a set tip added. You should work for what you get. But there are so many people out there who just don't tip correctly, don't know, or really can't afford it. And that sucks for the waitstaff who really are deserving of good tips. You would think Disney would pay them better, but we all know better. They want you to pay for what they don't have to.
So I believe that is their way of trying to keep the ones that are good. From what I have been hearing, Disney is having a tough time getting staff. I would have a difficult time working 13 hours a day, relying on my tips and not getting them, and that would force me to leave.
As for the buffet situation, here is what I know: I would work at least twice as many tables as I would a regular sit-down meal. I would be asked to turn these tables faster than normal. I would be asked to keep the table clear of all dirty dishes and to replenish drinks as quickly as possible. In most cases, I was supposed to make sure the buffet remains full at all times and is clean and appetizing in appearance. A buffet may require extensive set-up and always requires a large clean-up at the end of a shift. Now all this being said, if you can keep your head on straight and remember all the drinks and odd requests, you can move a heck of a lot of people through your station, but you will need to move at least triple the amount of people through to make what you can for a regular sit down service.
For Disney, they get to charge more per person and they can move a lot more through the restaurant per hour. The customers are usually happy because they can pick and choose multiple things and they do not have to wait for the food to arrive. But if Disney is going to require 18% for a buffet, I may just quit my job and move my family to Orlando.
As I get off this soap box, I want to address two other things:
For the poster who said that giving 20-25% because we worked in the industry before and "just make[sic] the problem worse" and that you start at 10% and then "The server then works their way up, or down" I have so many shoes I would like you to wear. I envy you that you can go to Disney twice a year and the Disney resorts you stay in, but I hope you may now understand what these servers can go through.
And the second thing is to the Executive Chef: do you hold your people responsible in front of the diner? If you do, I commend you, most won't. They will discipline at a later time, because it usually is not feasible to send your sous chef out in the middle of dinner, but that still leaves the server to deal with the patron face-to-face.
I apologize for my rant. I could go on, but I believe I know better. Thanks if you actually read this whole thing.