Me eitherI didn’t receive the email you refer to.

Me eitherI didn’t receive the email you refer to.
Nor me. The last email I had from them regarding a rental (starting from 19th April) said "let us know when points are returned and to what use year. we will then rent them and pay the final 30% when the reservation is made which should mean a very quick turnaround for you". I'm just reluctant to make a new reservation and unsure of receiving the 30%, but anything is better than being forced to return the 70% when I just don't have it. Maybe it's because they were borrowed Aug 2020 points, so if they do go back into the correct year as DVC say they will, then they are very useful points for David to use with his credit scheme. Just a thought but maybe only owners with very distressed points are getting that email?
I didn’t receive the email you refer to.
Nope, no travel credit email and my trip is already canceled. So much for Thursday!Have any Davids renters gotten the email about the terms of the travel credit? Would you mind sharing the details? I had a late April reservation so the information has not been sent out yet to me yet but I would to see what they are offering.
Yes, but sent because I specifically told them if DVC reversed their unborrowing of points before my reservation with them was cancelled by DVC, that I would be keeping the 70% and expected the 30% paid to me & that they knew my borrowed points would expire July 31 and that they had purchased those points and had use of them until they expired.Page 72 of this thread, post #1436, posted by Madame. I assumed it was an email, since Madame didn't state where it came from.
IMO people are trying to read exact and precise legal meaning into emails from Dave's that are meant to reassure and solve a problem. I am pretty confident this was not reviewed by an attorney prior to Dave sending it. It was send to me. It is accurate and unaltered outside me removing personal information. It asks "if" I would be willing to help. No demand no threat. They ask me not to cancel if it appear active and IMO that is pretty good advice for me and better for Dave. I have not contacted the renter yet because I am still in the banking window. Then Dave asks "work with us to see if there are any alternatives"
Dave does not say there has been contact with the renter and IMO the renter should make the decision on whether to gamble on Disney opening in late May/early June. I am waiting on an answer to this question. The idea of just returning the 70% is not developed at all. This is not really surprising to me. I assume it means in the event I get all my points back. It seem evident that only a fool would expect me to send the money back if my points have vanished. Waiting for an answer. Yet it is an 'ask' if I am willing. No threat and no demand. Dave states it is a big request.
Then since I have some of the money I am asked"if" i get my points back I would re-rent them. I presume this means without additional payment but don't know and I am waiting on a answer.
Dave specifically says the funds returned would go toward a travel credit and it would include Dave's commission. I assume but don't know Dave would take commission on use of the voucher.
"Good afternoon [DMU],
We are reaching out to you today in regards to the XXXXXX reservation.
As you are aware, COVID-19 has become a pandemic, and Disney Resorts and Operations has made the difficult but brave choice to close “until further notice”. The Disney Vacation Club is cancelling those reservations impacted by their decision and returning points to owner’s accounts.
As a result we are reaching out to inquire if you would be open to helping the XXXXXX family during this difficult time.
Reservation #XXXXXXXXXXX
Check in Date: May XX,2020
We ask, at this point, that you do not cancel this reservation if it appears active,but continue to work with us to see if there are any alternatives arrangements that we could pursue to assist this family.
We are asking if you would be willing to return the 70% for the XXXXX reservation. The funds that are returned will go towards a Travel Credit for the family. This Travel Credit will be in the total amount that the XXXXXX family paid for their reservation including our commission.
We understand that refunding the money is not feasible for all owners, in which case would you be willing to re-rent your returned points?By re-renting your returned points the funds from the new guest will go towards the Travel Credit.
We understand that this is a big request and a situation that we have never encountered. We are hoping that we can all work together to find a viable solution.
Please let us know if you are willing to assist.If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to reach out.
We look forward to hearing from you!"
Why do you want to make it even harder on yourself by returning the 70% with the lower CAD exchange rate? Just play along, offer to re-rent the points if possible; if the points expire, you keep the 70%; if you get a chance to re-rent, you get the rest of 30%. You don't even need to stress out over it, David would let you know when your points are needed.Yes, but sent because I specifically told them if DVC reversed their unborrowing of points before my reservation with them was cancelled by DVC, that I would be keeping the 70% and expected the 30% paid to me & that they knew my borrowed points would expire July 31 and that they had purchased those points and had use of them until they expired.
I don’t think it was unreasonable given that they KNOW point status when they give us a reservation to book. And that was the response... And that was when I decided I’d had enough. I will already be losing a large chunk of money as I now have to pay back US funds at a vastly higher exchange rate than when I received and used the funds. Yeah, they don’t care. And we are fortunate enough to both have secure savings and incomes during this time, so I’ll take the hit just to get out from under this contract, no matter the status of the points.
Have any Davids renters gotten the email about the terms of the travel credit? Would you mind sharing the details? I had a late April reservation so the information has not been sent out yet to me yet but I would to see what they are offering.
I wouldn't know about their volume but they appear to be a pretty big operation. I think they're not discussed on here because they're not allowed because David used to be sponsor. I initially went with them because they pay more pp then Davids and more upfront. But I've had nothing but positive experiences with them and I've done quite a few rentals over the years.
If I needed the money, I would. If this is the price I need to pay to get this off my plate, then so be it. However the lesson has been learned; I’m a fool me once, never again person.Why do you want to make it even harder on yourself by returning the 70% with the lower CAD exchange rate? Just play along, offer to re-rent the points if possible; if the points expire, you keep the 70%; if you get a chance to re-rent, you get the rest of 30%. You don't even need to stress out over it, David would let you know when your points are needed.
You're missing the fact that David's contract specifies the contract is governed under the laws of Canada, not Florida. So, while what you've quoted is interesting, it's not relevant to the contracts in question.
What I find interesting is that this new contract does not require the owner to refund the deposit payment (70%) in the event of a Force Majeure, but it also doesn't say that the owner gets to keep it either. It excuses the Intermediary from paying the 30% final fee, which apparently will be used to fund the "Credit" for the renter. In his email today to Owners affected by the closure, David's states that his attorney's opinion is that the Owner must re-pay the 70%. One has to wonder if the omission in the new contract is on purpose, either to not freak out owners if David's demands a refund from them, or to hide the fact that his correspondence to owners today is at odds with his latest contract.
There's no way I'd rent my points with them ever again. This is all just too shady.
Thats interesting. I have it in writing from them that my contract has been completed and that even if "my renter" succeeds with a charge back against them I will owe David's nothing.
Yes frustration of purpose is close to and often mistaken for impossibility. Since they are not generally self standing lawsuits they are further confused. Both are remedies for a breach of contract lawsuit. Both are also not remedies at law but at equity. Since they are equity remedies the mitigation of damages would/will play a vital role.
Here is where the destiny of the points becomes more important. If the points are gone then the hit will not go to the owner. If the points are safe the owner will not be allowed to double dip.
I would love to see the rest of this or the source documents.
I’ve been around these boards a while. Most times I am annoyingly forthright, sometimes a ridiculous SJW and a bit of a drama queen (I’m French speaking, it comes with the territoryYes frustration of purpose is close to and often mistaken for impossibility. Since they are not generally self standing lawsuits they are further confused. Both are remedies for a breach of contract lawsuit. Both are also not remedies at law but at equity. Since they are equity remedies the mitigation of damages would/will play a vital role.
Here is where the destiny of the points becomes more important. If the points are gone then the hit will not go to the owner. If the points are safe the owner will not be allowed to double dip.
I would love to see the rest of this or the source documents.