because Ramsey was on the take for TET.
I'm a little more charitable about this. DR hates timeshares with a white-hot passion. And in fairness, that's not a terrible position to take by default: The typical timeshare business model is at best unscrupulous, and at worst flagrantly dishonest. Unless someone has done a fair bit of research in advance, they are better off staying far (far!) away from a timeshare sales pitch.
DR is also an entertainer, and makes his money by people who advertise their services on his show, via his website, etc. I have no idea whether or not he vets most of those businesses, but most businesses are at least moderately ethical, because so are most people. And, those businesses probably benefit a lot from that promotion, because DR's brand is no-nonsense I'm-on-your-side advice. When he plugs a business, that's got to help--and the principals of TET said as much,
attributing DR's show to an order-of-magnitude increase in business.
So along comes TET, who would like to advertise and pay the fee to be listed on his preferred vendor list. The have plenty of testimonials and nominally seem like an okay idea. DR hates timeshares (and again, probably fairly) so why not include them in his stable of preferred vendors? And if they are willing to pay for an on-air promotion, that's okay too. After all, timeshares are evil and this is a way to stick it to them.
The problem is that, unlike most of DR's advertisers, TET does not exactly have clean hands when it comes to the ethics of business, and has a lot in common with the timeshare developers when it comes to business models. And, a lot of people called the show out on it. DR then doubled down, and as far as I know to this day has stuck to his guns. Not particularly surprising, because DR's brand and business would take a pretty serious hit if he came out and said "Whoops, sorry, I was totally wrong about those guys!" In particular, all of his
other advertisers are not going to be happy if that happens. Not one bit. So of course that's not going to happen.
TET no longer advertises on DR.
DR's public stance is that they "can't afford to" because of the lawsuits. I would not be surprised if TET's absence has more to do with DR's team deciding that they'd rather cut bait, but of course I have no specific evidence for that. Just a hunch. It's also possible that TET cut the relationship because it created so much bad press for them, but I suspect that's less likely.
-----------------
At the end of the day, there is no magic bullet to void a legally executed timeshare sales contract, and no company can promise you that they can do that. They can write a nastygram to the developer and hope the developer blinks and takes a deedback in lieu of foreclosure. But the developers know that these companies have no teeth behind that letter, so if they want to play hardball they will. A local lawyer can write the same nastygram for a couple hundred bucks, and have a better chance of winning this game of chicken, because they are an unknown entity.