I like the B&W conversion, the color distracts from her features while the B&W focuses on them. I think the original eye color might work even better.
Good job!
I'm not a big fan of selective coloring - just my opinion. I think pure B&W conversion w/o the colored eyes would e a better picture.
When you talk about the original eye color, do you mean black and white, or not quite so intense an blue as I used?
Not as intense, just a subtle hint of color to make people look twice and wonder "is it tinted or B&W?". I think it really draws people in that way.
No more lurking now, show us some more!![]()
Ok, thanks!
Oh, and part of what I wondered about on this one is the composition. Advice or comments? This picture is of my 14 year old daughter, so of course I'm somewhat partial to the subject matter.
I read a thread last week (while I was lurking) about developing "the eye", and taking a very large number of pics of the same subject. I took that advice, and this was one of the results. You really have to think more creatively to take that many pictures of the same subject. I appreciate that advice!
I like the B&W one best too. I think she's a great subject, really sweet looking.
Is there a way to soften the upper left quadrant of the photo? At first glance I thought it seemed just a wee bit close in terms of composition. But then I thought if it could just be softened a bit that would take care of it. I think the framing is really nice but I find myself wanting to back up from the photo. I think that is because some of the closer features are a little too harsh.
If that little bit where the light hits her right cheekbone (our left), to the bridge of her nose and then over her right eyebrow could be a little softer I think it would work better as a portrait. Does anyone know how to do that?