Contemporary Resort

Maybe NONE of us will get to own CRV. We'll only be competing with each other at the 7 month mark to get rooms there. :lmao:

Personally, I wouldn't care if this were the case. I would like to stay there sometimes, but wasn't looking to buy there. With this, I'm on an equal playing field with all other DVC members (well, other than the CR "owner").
 
if dvc was going to do this - then why not say so NOW.

they got to know that several people won't buy unless it is CR - and others are waiting that might have brought at SSR or AKV.

this scheme just doesn't make sense.

really think DVC will share with CR - at least for the first year.

of course if Disney is waiting until the resort is finished to announce it. that makes no sense either.

the economy is going down - so pre sales need to start as soon as possible.

hopefully the annoucement in May will tell us something.

still think the hold up is because DVC and WDW resorts are fighting over the MK views. of course who really knows?

does anyone think that the suites at CR - which have the old bathrooms - will be rehab like the rest of the resort - once the DVC is up and going. Since now they have a place to put their suites guest?
 
If you read from this website (Wikipedia) it says it will be three 16-story buildings arranged in a crescent-shape around a recreation area. and it will be affiliated with the Disney Vacation club. Maybe they will declare one or two of the buildings as DVC. You can read here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney's_Contemporary_Resort#_note-2
 
Maybe NONE of us will get to own CRV. We'll only be competing with each other at the 7 month mark to get rooms there. :lmao:

Maybe no one will get a shot at the 7 month window either.

I might be wrong on my understanding of this, and let me know if I am, but wouldn't the Use Year (month) come into play as well?

If Resorts owns ALL the points, they would own them across all of the UY months (I think January and what, November or something are never sold as UY months?)

But if Resorts owns ALL of the points, they could book every single room for every single day of the year during the 8-11 month window as each UY month's points become available.

Now, Resorts has, say, the entire month of June reserved at 11 months out with their June points - all rooms, all nights.

It's 7 months out and I want a ressie for sometime in June - no dice, all booked.

Now Resorts has no incentive to give up ressies 7 months out when they can still try to put a cash paying customer in the room - until 4 months out when they need to bank any unused points into next year or have them expire if they can't rent the room!

So my first chance to book a reservation may not come until 4 months before my planned trip.

Now, any points that Resorts banks into next year, just means more competition next year at other resorts. Why? Because they still have ALL the points for CRV, meaning they can book every single room for every night again, plus they have banked points they can use to get ressies at the other properties 7 months or less out!

It's actually a bit of a benefit for them since, if they didn't have any points, owned the property and ran it as a strictly cash hotel, they'd lose potential revenue for any room nights not sold. In this case, they get a second chance at revenue by banking points and going after a reservation in the next year at another resort.

And if what Chuck S suggested came to pass, with higher points requirements, their ability to chew up additional availability at the other resorts would only be enhanced.
 

Brilliant! I didn't think of use year. I just can't believe that this will be the final outcome. And I will go on record as someone who has NO interest in buying CR points. And only minimal interest in staying there. I just think that this doesn't make sense, is likely not legal, and sets a bad precedent for DVC.
 
No one is ever guaranteed a room at 7 months. Any resort could be booked up at the 7 month mark at any time of the year. Mostly happens during the holiday travel times, and more so at the smaller resorts, but Disney owning all the points at CRV would have no bearing on availability at the 7 month mark IMO.
 
As someone who spends a couple of hours a day in a conference room listening to ideas being kicked around over how to handle different legal situations, the OP's comments definitely smell like "conference room brainstorming". Some of the stuff in-house execs come up with just makes outside counsel cringe, and almost all of those kinds of ideas never end up happening. It probably sounded great to the people in the conference room, and then once they take the idea up the chain or to their outside counsel, it probably would get shot down for a number of reasons the people who came up with the idea never thought about. I wouldn't worry about it.
 
With all this "what ifs" and how Disney could try to have their cake and eat it too, you have to remember DVC is a business and they will NOT do anything that will negatively impact that business. They are not trying to run off customers, but attract customers. Doing any sort of backhanded DVC will help the system as a whole and therefore will not help spur more sales, but actually could affect existing DVC members who might flee the system. That in itself would go to show that this plan, while maybe contemplated at one point would not go forward. This is probably something that was discussed in a Resorts meeting on how to combat the DVC building and steal rooms for themselves :rotfl2:

Waiting for the resort to be in range of being finished, actually makes perfect sense, as has been discussed numerous times on numerous boards....they will not wait till all the rooms are done....but there is no incentive to announce now, actually with rumors out there about a possible CRV it is probably just as good, if not better than an actual announcement, look at the number of threads dedicated to this alone.
 
Wouldn't these boards light up like a Christmas tree if this really came to pass.
 
Wouldn't these boards light up like a Christmas tree if this really came to pass.

Oh I bet the boards will be lit up like a Christmas tree today! Check out the link for the "Kingdom Tower" on the DVC Operations board. The title is something from the Orlando Sentinel.

:surfweb:
 
saw it - only 75 units.:cool1: :thumbsup2

Spicey,
Didn't the article say 75 units to start with and 281 units when complete?

Disney says in the documents that it will sell the time shares in phases, beginning with an initial 75 units. The Kingdom Tower, which will connect to the existing Contemporary via a fifth-floor pedestrian bridge, will ultimately contain 281 units, according to the filings.

-DC
 
Spicey,
Didn't the article say 75 units to start with and 281 units when complete?



-DC

yes - but you know Disney - they have only agreed at present to sell 75.

if the CR rents out the rest of the resort and kepts renting it out. then those 75 might be it.

but that is doom - love it!!!
 
Only 25% ....... I really thought it would be 50/50 split.

Oh, what a rush it will be for those few rooms.
 
Only 25% ....... I really thought it would be 50/50 split.

Oh, what a rush it will be for those few rooms.
QUOTE FROM SENTINEL ARTICLE:

Disney says in the documents that it will sell the time shares in phases, beginning with an initial 75 units. The Kingdom Tower, which will connect to the existing Contemporary via a fifth-floor pedestrian bridge, will ultimately contain 281 units, according to the filings

This says 100% to me - just that it will be sold in phases as was SSR, AKV etc.
 
I saw that, but with those rumors about the on going internal struggles for control of inventory. Those other units may or may not make it for sale. They might wait 5 years between phases, save some for future offerings.

Look at Vero, Eagle Pines and Newport as examples of "may happen" catagories.

I will wait to hear more details on all this.
 



















DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top