Not really. In this scenario planners have an advantage.This is why it seems to me like it will please both camps.
It's not the size nor attendance with respects to functionality and the fact that you point to that means you aren't quite thinking about what you said.I just looked up Silver Dollar City, having never heard of it. It's half the size of the smallest park at WDW and about 1/4 the attendance of the least-visited WDW park. No surprise that they can do things differently there.
When.... and also what, if any changes - all the posts are just rumors, speculation, and some wishful thinking (based on how we personally would like to see it!!) at this point. But with G+ selling out right now for the highest prices so far - Disney can't be in too big a hurry to make changes to something that's working for them.....Just wish we knew when in 2024.![]()
Planners have always had an advantage with every system Disney has implemented and IMO I don't think that aspect will be going away.Not really. In this scenario planners have an advantage.
True and that's an observation my DISer group and I had as well (who have been to more than just Disney parks) but just using the SDC their most in demand ride was about 70 mins standby and less than 5 for us although we had just by luck walked up at the right time as we saw more entering the line behind us. You can only go through one time even with the unlimited trailblazer (they hole punch your pass) for that particular attraction (which is Kali on steroids) but they had a completely different line for it on the opposite side and loading area. But they also were loading the attraction when there weren't people in the line something of which Disney is not known to do, something of which Universal is much more known to do. There are various things that Disney does that other parks don't but ones of which I don't see as a positive.That's fair. Universal is not that much smaller than WDW and that system works there too. IMO the biggest difference is the attitude of guests between parks.
Meaning as much as people will complain about waiting in lines at Universal or other parks, they accept that's part of going to a park.
Other than other Disney parks, could you please tell me what parks are comparable to WDW? A place where one goes on a week-long vacation and still hasn't seen/done nearly everything? With a broad range of rides, including enough non-thrill rides to appeal to every member of a family? And Broadway-calibre shows? With amazing theming, landscaping, and architecture? Not to mention many terrific resorts and restaurants?Virtually every other park out there that has a get ahead of the line system does something that somehow funnels people through lines and not have them plan in advance.
Despite what some say Disney parks themselves are not as unique as one would think.
I believe there will be changes. And no doubt, Disney is not going to lose a dime on any thing they tweak. Your right, its a cash cow for them.When.... and also what, if any changes - all the posts are just rumors, speculation, and some wishful thinking (based on how we personally would like to see it!!) at this point. But with G+ selling out right now for the highest prices so far - Disney can't be in too big a hurry to make changes to something that's working for them.....
That's partly because Universal's product is effectively much more expensive, and so correspondingly fewer people use it. Disney could do the same thing, but it would cost even more, and fewer people would be able/willing to buy it. If you think people are upset now...IDK seems Universal has a handle on that
TBH, with all due respect, this is exactly what I mean. If you want to have the good conversation you've got to remove Disney from the pedestal you've got it on so that you can focus on other things. You really think that Disney is the only theme park out there that does stuff? Or is it that you either haven't been to other theme parks, haven't looked at what other theme parks have to offer or merely just have the preference for how Disney does it? The answer to your question is yes other theme parks out there exist that do stuff.Other than other Disney parks, could you please tell me what parks are comparable to WDW? A place where one goes on a week-long vacation and still hasn't seen/done nearly everything? With a broad range of rides, including enough non-thrill rides to appeal to every member of a family? And Broadway-calibre shows? With amazing theming, landscaping, and architecture? Not to mention many terrific resorts and restaurants?
The only parks that come close are Universal's, and, from what I gather, a huge percentage of the attractions there that aren't for very young kids are thrill rides, which is why I've never been. And do Universal parkgoers visit for one or two weeks at a stretch? Maybe they do. But if you stay at a Universal deluxe resort, you get Express Pass included, so there's no comparison there.
I agree nobody is forced to plan. At the same time going to a theme park shouldn't involve this much planning. IMO all that should be required to plan is your transportation, your resort and some dining. Planning what time to ride an attraction is too much.Nobody is forced to plan. But like just about everywhere else in life, if you want to just show up, expect to either wait longer, pay extra for immediate gratification, or just miss out.
Do they? I don't think that subgroup of visitors gets an advantage with current Genie+. The thing I like the most about it is that it puts everyone on the same field. Offsite, Deluxe, Value, APs, DIS fans, families that don't know about Genie+ till they get there. Everyone has the same shot at LLs.Planners have always had an advantage with every system Disney has implemented and IMO I don't think that aspect will be going away.
There is a reason it costs that much. It limits how many people buy it. Which does 2 things, one it makes standby better as it moves constantly and two, those who buy it actually get their money's worth.> That's partly because Universal's product is effectively much more expensive
...and the same is true at Dollywood, another Herschend park (same ownership as SDC). Dollywood's product is $60 for five uses, but excluding the two attractions with the longest waits. It's $80 per person per day for the full monty--and even there, you can only use it on the most popular covered attraction once.
For comparison, a signle-day ticket to Dollywood is only $92, so the full VQ is close to doubling the admission cost. WDW would charge at least as much as a single-day ticket, and probably more.
What Brian said is what I mean. Planners = experienced guests that know how Genie+ works. Those people have an advantage over those that aren't as familiar with Genie+.Do they? I don't think that subgroup of visitors gets an advantage with current Genie+. The thing I like the most about it is that it puts everyone on the same field. Offsite, Deluxe, Value, APs, DIS fans, families that don't know about Genie+ till they get there. Everyone has the same shot at LLs.
Don't get me wrong me, if they do the 1 in advance or however many I will do them because I don't want to be at a disadvantage, my pride is not that big, but I will not like it.
That is not what I mean. But ok.What Brian said is what I mean. Planners = experienced guests that know how Genie+ works. Those people have an advantage over those that aren't as familiar with Genie+.
Like, for example someone that understands how stacking works will utilize Genie+ better than someone that doesn't.
I agree nobody is forced to plan. At the same time going to a theme park shouldn't involve this much planning. IMO all that should be required to plan is your transportation, your resort and some dining. Planning what time to ride an attraction is too much.