Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 31,264
Oh I do agree with you. I think I would have preferred a new room myself. I think the cleaning part came up more because of the OP stating they agreed the room would be cleaned the next day. I think most of us posters probably would have just commented they needed a new room as if cleaning the room wasn't even an option given the circumstances-it's just the OP mentioned getting the room cleaned.Someone presented cleaning the room, and even if OP did, management should have said, we would rather move you. This is unacceptable and we want you to know you're in a clean room and be able to rest comfortably.
The second that underwear was reported and the full tub, management should've insisted they move. Honestly, it is a health concern and I agree with the underwear containing as many bodily fluids. If I was management, I would've never agreed to a deep clean the next day. That is simply unacceptable.
If a guest finds blood smeared on the floor, is that a "since it is so late, we will send someone up to clean it tomorrow." situation? No. Neither is underwear or a condom. Management should've said, "I know it is late but we have to move you for your own safety." even if OP suggested waiting.
It does get one wondering though why someone would be offered (meaning the front desk) much less agree (meaning the OP) to staying in a room that could be a health risk.

