I'm not sure what your complaint with my post is--because I haven't held an AP as long as you? You don't think as an AP holder you should be offered a discounted room as a perk? You think the codes should be offered to everyone before AP holders (loyal guests) are offered benefits?
In my view, it doesn't matter what the perk was or wasn't in 1995 (with the discontinuance of DC, one would think there's an even greater market for an AP)--room discounts have been advertised as a "perk" of holding an AP since at least 2000. Disney has created an expectation. Hey, I didn't need an AP in the early to mid-90s (nor a DC for that matter) because I was a shareholder and there were benefits attached to that as well.
Granted, all "rules" do change. . .when those changes occur we have the option to avail ourselves of the AP because it makes sense for our vacation plans--or not--if there are no room benefits, meal discounts, or ticket discounts, I'd probably rethink my renewals since, unlike you, I'm not lucky enough to travel to WDW more than once a year (usually--like Disney, there are exceptions to my rules, too).
We hold PAPs, since we do the water parks, PI, and DQ--an UMP is still cheaper than that annual pass for a 9 day stay--the 8 day break even doesn't work for that pass, not even on a renewal basis. Still, it's a good value IF there are perks that go along with it. People need to decide for themselves whether or not it's the right purchase for them based upon all of the factors and not just a single one.
All I'm trying to say is, the AP/PAP is sold with a list of perks AND discounted rooms and packages are included in that list, for now anyway.